<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Microsoft&#8217;s Viridian at 1Mb to be significantly smaller than VMware&#8217;s ESX 3i hypervisor at 32Mb?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.techagility.info/2007/09/microsofts-viridian-at-1mb-to-be-significantly-smaller-than-vmwares-esx-3i-hypervisor-at-32mb/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.techagility.info/2007/09/microsofts-viridian-at-1mb-to-be-significantly-smaller-than-vmwares-esx-3i-hypervisor-at-32mb/</link>
	<description>using Technology to become more Agile at work and play - and more thoughts on VDI, Thin Clients, VMware, Citrix, etc...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 28 Jul 2010 07:37:52 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill172945824','64059212billy@msn.com','','97.48.115.189','2008-06-06 02:21:05','2008-06-06 02:21:05','','0','lynx','comment','0','0'),('0', '', '', '', '', '2008-06-07 02:21:05', '2008-06-07 02:21:05', '', 'spam', '', 'comment', '0','0' ) /*</title>
		<link>http://www.techagility.info/2007/09/microsofts-viridian-at-1mb-to-be-significantly-smaller-than-vmwares-esx-3i-hypervisor-at-32mb/comment-page-1/#comment-583</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill172945824','64059212billy@msn.com','','97.48.115.189','2008-06-06 02:21:05','2008-06-06 02:21:05','','0','lynx','comment','0','0'),('0', '', '', '', '', '2008-06-07 02:21:05', '2008-06-07 02:21:05', '', 'spam', '', 'comment', '0','0' ) /*</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jun 2008 09:20:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techagility.info/2007/09/25/microsofts-viridian-at-1mb-to-be-significantly-smaller-than-vmwares-esx-3i-hypervisor-at-32mb/#comment-583</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;None...&lt;/strong&gt;

None...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>None&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>None&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill249852924','13049745billy@msn.com','','23.31.107.154','2008-06-06 09:05:02','2008-06-06 09:05:02','','0','lynx','comment','0','0'),('0', '', '', '', '', '2008-06-07 09:05:02', '2008-06-07 09:05:02', '', 'spam', '', 'comment', '0','0' ) /*</title>
		<link>http://www.techagility.info/2007/09/microsofts-viridian-at-1mb-to-be-significantly-smaller-than-vmwares-esx-3i-hypervisor-at-32mb/comment-page-1/#comment-582</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill249852924','13049745billy@msn.com','','23.31.107.154','2008-06-06 09:05:02','2008-06-06 09:05:02','','0','lynx','comment','0','0'),('0', '', '', '', '', '2008-06-07 09:05:02', '2008-06-07 09:05:02', '', 'spam', '', 'comment', '0','0' ) /*</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jun 2008 00:12:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techagility.info/2007/09/25/microsofts-viridian-at-1mb-to-be-significantly-smaller-than-vmwares-esx-3i-hypervisor-at-32mb/#comment-582</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;None...&lt;/strong&gt;

None...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>None&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>None&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
