<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Thinking of a Remote Computing Solution based on Citrix/VDI/BladePC&#8217;s? Make sure your Network is up to the task, or you might have curious issues?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.techagility.info/2008/12/thinking-of-a-remote-computing-solution-based-on-citrixvdibladepcs-make-sure-your-network-is-up-to-the-task-or-you-might-have-curious-issues/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.techagility.info/2008/12/thinking-of-a-remote-computing-solution-based-on-citrixvdibladepcs-make-sure-your-network-is-up-to-the-task-or-you-might-have-curious-issues/</link>
	<description>using Technology to become more Agile at work and play - and more thoughts on VDI, Thin Clients, VMware, Citrix, etc...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 16 Aug 2010 13:31:26 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jon</title>
		<link>http://www.techagility.info/2008/12/thinking-of-a-remote-computing-solution-based-on-citrixvdibladepcs-make-sure-your-network-is-up-to-the-task-or-you-might-have-curious-issues/comment-page-1/#comment-659</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 22:17:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techagility.info/2008/12/thinking-of-a-remote-computing-solution-based-on-citrixvdibladepcs-make-sure-your-network-is-up-to-the-task-or-you-might-have-curious-issues/#comment-659</guid>
		<description>Prior to the trend towards SBC and VDI I think many firms could &quot;get away with&quot; inefficient networks.  Certainly though with recent trend towards Thin Client machines the performance of the network becomes that much more important.  All-in-all most firms will still come out ahead.  Save $2 on end-user machines and reinvest $1 of that into optimizing network performance.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Prior to the trend towards SBC and VDI I think many firms could &#8220;get away with&#8221; inefficient networks.  Certainly though with recent trend towards Thin Client machines the performance of the network becomes that much more important.  All-in-all most firms will still come out ahead.  Save $2 on end-user machines and reinvest $1 of that into optimizing network performance.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
