<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Planning a Desktop Virtualization project? &#8211; it might be worth making sure you investigate if the Business needs a Remote Protocol that can deliver a &#8220;High Quality User Experience&#8221;? Is RDP7 up to it?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.techagility.info/2009/06/planning-a-desktop-virtualization-project-it-might-be-worth-making-sure-you-investigate-if-the-business-needs-a-remote-protocol-that-can-deliver-a-high-quality-user-experience/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.techagility.info/2009/06/planning-a-desktop-virtualization-project-it-might-be-worth-making-sure-you-investigate-if-the-business-needs-a-remote-protocol-that-can-deliver-a-high-quality-user-experience/</link>
	<description>using Technology to become more Agile at work and play - and more thoughts on VDI, Thin Clients, VMware, Citrix, etc...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 28 Jul 2010 07:37:52 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: flashflying</title>
		<link>http://www.techagility.info/2009/06/planning-a-desktop-virtualization-project-it-might-be-worth-making-sure-you-investigate-if-the-business-needs-a-remote-protocol-that-can-deliver-a-high-quality-user-experience/comment-page-1/#comment-1801</link>
		<dc:creator>flashflying</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Jul 2009 03:21:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techagility.info/?p=370#comment-1801</guid>
		<description>Nice little thing you have going on here.  Kept me nice and busy while I am sitting here bored.  I have a flashflying site at  when you have some time!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice little thing you have going on here.  Kept me nice and busy while I am sitting here bored.  I have a flashflying site at  when you have some time!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Video Hosting</title>
		<link>http://www.techagility.info/2009/06/planning-a-desktop-virtualization-project-it-might-be-worth-making-sure-you-investigate-if-the-business-needs-a-remote-protocol-that-can-deliver-a-high-quality-user-experience/comment-page-1/#comment-1791</link>
		<dc:creator>Video Hosting</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Jul 2009 20:18:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techagility.info/?p=370#comment-1791</guid>
		<description>Very well written post however, I would recommend that you turn the No Follow off in your comment section.

Keep up the good work.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very well written post however, I would recommend that you turn the No Follow off in your comment section.</p>
<p>Keep up the good work.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stuart Robinson</title>
		<link>http://www.techagility.info/2009/06/planning-a-desktop-virtualization-project-it-might-be-worth-making-sure-you-investigate-if-the-business-needs-a-remote-protocol-that-can-deliver-a-high-quality-user-experience/comment-page-1/#comment-1731</link>
		<dc:creator>Stuart Robinson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2009 16:59:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techagility.info/?p=370#comment-1731</guid>
		<description>Hi David, 

One correction to note - that VMware View integrates PCoIP software in 2009 and does NOT require hardware in the server to get a great user experience.  

Future virtual hardware off-load will help scale the number of VM&#039;s per server (or free up CPU cycles for the users apps) and will also improve the user expience, but is optional.  

Great article!
Stu</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi David, </p>
<p>One correction to note &#8211; that VMware View integrates PCoIP software in 2009 and does NOT require hardware in the server to get a great user experience.  </p>
<p>Future virtual hardware off-load will help scale the number of VM&#8217;s per server (or free up CPU cycles for the users apps) and will also improve the user expience, but is optional.  </p>
<p>Great article!<br />
Stu</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TREX</title>
		<link>http://www.techagility.info/2009/06/planning-a-desktop-virtualization-project-it-might-be-worth-making-sure-you-investigate-if-the-business-needs-a-remote-protocol-that-can-deliver-a-high-quality-user-experience/comment-page-1/#comment-1710</link>
		<dc:creator>TREX</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Jun 2009 23:48:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techagility.info/?p=370#comment-1710</guid>
		<description>Very very well thought out and insightful. I would agree, until we can speak to the adherence to a PC-LIKE experience for the users, AND cater to the needs of the lines of business in our design criteria, we are missing the boat.

Let me know if you want a copy of Stratusphere to do some testing.

T.Rex</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very very well thought out and insightful. I would agree, until we can speak to the adherence to a PC-LIKE experience for the users, AND cater to the needs of the lines of business in our design criteria, we are missing the boat.</p>
<p>Let me know if you want a copy of Stratusphere to do some testing.</p>
<p>T.Rex</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Planning a Desktop Virtualization project? â€“ it might be worth &#8230; &#124; DesktopAids.Com</title>
		<link>http://www.techagility.info/2009/06/planning-a-desktop-virtualization-project-it-might-be-worth-making-sure-you-investigate-if-the-business-needs-a-remote-protocol-that-can-deliver-a-high-quality-user-experience/comment-page-1/#comment-1706</link>
		<dc:creator>Planning a Desktop Virtualization project? â€“ it might be worth &#8230; &#124; DesktopAids.Com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Jun 2009 20:00:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techagility.info/?p=370#comment-1706</guid>
		<description>[...] More:Â  Planning a Desktop Virtualization project? â€“ it might be worth &#8230; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] More:Â  Planning a Desktop Virtualization project? â€“ it might be worth &#8230; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason Miles</title>
		<link>http://www.techagility.info/2009/06/planning-a-desktop-virtualization-project-it-might-be-worth-making-sure-you-investigate-if-the-business-needs-a-remote-protocol-that-can-deliver-a-high-quality-user-experience/comment-page-1/#comment-1704</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason Miles</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Jun 2009 16:42:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techagility.info/?p=370#comment-1704</guid>
		<description>This is serious good stuff Dave.  Absolute top bit of research.   Here comes RDP7 sounds like which is better.  Thanks, Jason</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is serious good stuff Dave.  Absolute top bit of research.   Here comes RDP7 sounds like which is better.  Thanks, Jason</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
