<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>TechAgility &#187; Citrix</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.techagility.info/category/citrix/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.techagility.info</link>
	<description>using Technology to become more Agile at work and play - and more thoughts on VDI, Thin Clients, VMware, Citrix, etc...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 28 Jul 2010 06:46:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Musings on VDI performance</title>
		<link>http://www.techagility.info/2009/12/musings-on-vdi-performance/</link>
		<comments>http://www.techagility.info/2009/12/musings-on-vdi-performance/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Dec 2009 05:58:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>dcaddick</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[App Streaming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Citrix]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Finance and Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Networks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Performance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Remote Protocols]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Thin Clients]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VDI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VMware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Virtualization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows 7]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techagility.info/?p=447</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So as things slowdown in the lead up to the break I have had some time to get back and review some twitter posts and other blog articles that I have been meaning to catch up on. I must admit that I tend not to use Twitter that much but do find it quite useful [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.techagility.info/2009/12/musings-on-vdi-performance/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Looking deeper in to the T5545 ThinPro Linux Thin Client from HP &#8211; and how to tweak it and make deployments a breeze?</title>
		<link>http://www.techagility.info/2009/10/looking-deeper-in-to-the-t5545-thinpro-linux-thin-client-from-hp-and-how-to-tweak-it-and-make-deployments-a-breeze/</link>
		<comments>http://www.techagility.info/2009/10/looking-deeper-in-to-the-t5545-thinpro-linux-thin-client-from-hp-and-how-to-tweak-it-and-make-deployments-a-breeze/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Oct 2009 13:26:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>dcaddick</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Citrix]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HP/Neoware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Linux]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Thin Clients]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VDI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[XenApp]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techagility.info/2009/10/looking-deeper-in-to-the-t5545-thinpro-linux-thin-client-from-hp-and-how-to-tweak-it-and-make-deployments-a-breeze/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The T5545 Thin Client from HP is quite a neat mid-range device that has some nice features that can make your life quite easy, but so far it seems that it’s not all that easy to find out how to go about tweaking it to your environment and users? I’ll update this later with some [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.techagility.info/2009/10/looking-deeper-in-to-the-t5545-thinpro-linux-thin-client-from-hp-and-how-to-tweak-it-and-make-deployments-a-breeze/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Some recent comments around Client Virtualization, View, XenDesktop, Remote Protocols,etc&#8230; now that VMworld 2009 has been and gone</title>
		<link>http://www.techagility.info/2009/09/some-recent-comments-around-client-virtualization-view-xendesktop-remote-protocolsetc-now-that-vmworld-2009-has-been-and-gone/</link>
		<comments>http://www.techagility.info/2009/09/some-recent-comments-around-client-virtualization-view-xendesktop-remote-protocolsetc-now-that-vmworld-2009-has-been-and-gone/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Sep 2009 01:54:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>dcaddick</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blades]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Citrix]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hardware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Remote Protocols]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Thin Clients]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VDI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VMware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Virtualization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[XenApp]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[XenServer]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techagility.info/2009/09/some-recent-comments-around-client-virtualization-view-xendesktop-remote-protocolsetc-now-that-vmworld-2009-has-been-and-gone/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The best piece I have read from the IT Industry in the last two weeks or so is: Why desktop virtualization projects fail Desktop virtualization is one of the hottest topics of interest and a major initiative of many companies. Touted benefits include lower operating costs, simpler management and desktop mobility. Below we’ll explore what [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.techagility.info/2009/09/some-recent-comments-around-client-virtualization-view-xendesktop-remote-protocolsetc-now-that-vmworld-2009-has-been-and-gone/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>10</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Citrix &#8220;announces&#8221; HDX-3D on ahead of VMworld, but no sign of a download or trial yet?</title>
		<link>http://www.techagility.info/2009/09/citrix-announces-hdx-3d-on-ahead-of-vmworld-but-no-sign-of-a-download-or-trial-yet/</link>
		<comments>http://www.techagility.info/2009/09/citrix-announces-hdx-3d-on-ahead-of-vmworld-but-no-sign-of-a-download-or-trial-yet/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Aug 2009 13:08:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>dcaddick</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Citrix]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Networks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Performance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Remote Protocols]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Thin Clients]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VDI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VMware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows 7]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[XPe]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techagility.info/2009/09/citrix-announces-hdx-3d-on-ahead-of-vmworld-but-no-sign-of-a-download-or-trial-yet/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So it’s hardly a surprise that Citrix have decided to “Announce” the long awaited HDX-3D “high quality user experience” protocol enhancement in the early hours prior to the start of the VMworld conference? Pardon me for being something of a sceptic, but it seems that this might have more to do with the fact that [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.techagility.info/2009/09/citrix-announces-hdx-3d-on-ahead-of-vmworld-but-no-sign-of-a-download-or-trial-yet/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>HP&#8217;s range of Linux Thin Clients getting a refresh?</title>
		<link>http://www.techagility.info/2009/08/hps-range-of-linux-thin-clients-getting-a-refresh/</link>
		<comments>http://www.techagility.info/2009/08/hps-range-of-linux-thin-clients-getting-a-refresh/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Aug 2009 11:52:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>dcaddick</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Citrix]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HP/Neoware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hardware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Linux]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Thin Clients]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VDI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[XenApp]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techagility.info/2009/08/hps-range-of-linux-thin-clients-getting-a-refresh/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So some of you may be aware that the new T5545 was released some while back with a new O/S designated ThinPro – this has recently been updated with a new release of Build 31 and now looks a little like this in Admin mode: To switch to Admin mode there is a simple menu [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.techagility.info/2009/08/hps-range-of-linux-thin-clients-getting-a-refresh/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>HP reference configuration for Citrix XenApp: 1,500 Microsoft Office 2003 users on HP ProLiant BL460c G6 server blades</title>
		<link>http://www.techagility.info/2009/06/hp-reference-configuration-for-citrix-xenapp-1500-microsoft-office-2003-users-on-hp-proliant-bl460c-g6-server-blades/</link>
		<comments>http://www.techagility.info/2009/06/hp-reference-configuration-for-citrix-xenapp-1500-microsoft-office-2003-users-on-hp-proliant-bl460c-g6-server-blades/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2009 01:42:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>dcaddick</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Citrix]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HP/Neoware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hardware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Virtualization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[XenApp]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techagility.info/2009/06/hp-reference-configuration-for-citrix-xenapp-1500-microsoft-office-2003-users-on-hp-proliant-bl460c-g6-server-blades/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Just like London Buses, you wait around for ages, and then they all turn up at once? (Whitepapers, that is?) HP reference configuration for Citrix XenApp: 1,500 Microsoft Office 2003 users on HP ProLiant BL460c G6 server blades This document illustrates multiple blades configurations using bare-metal configurations and converting them to virtualized ones.&#160; The goal [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.techagility.info/2009/06/hp-reference-configuration-for-citrix-xenapp-1500-microsoft-office-2003-users-on-hp-proliant-bl460c-g6-server-blades/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>New Whitepapers from HP about how to Automate Citrix XenApp on XenServer with Powershell scripts, etc.</title>
		<link>http://www.techagility.info/2009/06/new-whitepapers-from-hp-about-how-to-automate-citrix-xenapp-on-xenserver-with-powershell-scripts-etc/</link>
		<comments>http://www.techagility.info/2009/06/new-whitepapers-from-hp-about-how-to-automate-citrix-xenapp-on-xenserver-with-powershell-scripts-etc/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Jun 2009 22:46:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>dcaddick</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blades]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Citrix]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HP/Neoware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Performance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Virtualization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[XenApp]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[XenServer]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techagility.info/2009/06/new-whitepapers-from-hp-about-how-to-automate-citrix-xenapp-on-xenserver-with-powershell-scripts-etc/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[**UPDATE** I have received the following comment: has anyone had any luck with the Automating Citrix Xenapp whitepaper, as i have issues when trying to import the deploy XenServer Altiris job as both .bin files seem to contain the same jobs, which are for deploying clients. And yes this is the case – I have [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.techagility.info/2009/06/new-whitepapers-from-hp-about-how-to-automate-citrix-xenapp-on-xenserver-with-powershell-scripts-etc/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Planning a Desktop Virtualization project? &#8211; it might be worth making sure you investigate if the Business needs a Remote Protocol that can deliver a &#8220;High Quality User Experience&#8221;? Is RDP7 up to it?</title>
		<link>http://www.techagility.info/2009/06/planning-a-desktop-virtualization-project-it-might-be-worth-making-sure-you-investigate-if-the-business-needs-a-remote-protocol-that-can-deliver-a-high-quality-user-experience/</link>
		<comments>http://www.techagility.info/2009/06/planning-a-desktop-virtualization-project-it-might-be-worth-making-sure-you-investigate-if-the-business-needs-a-remote-protocol-that-can-deliver-a-high-quality-user-experience/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Jun 2009 11:08:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>dcaddick</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Citrix]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HP/Neoware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Networks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Performance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Remote Protocols]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Thin Clients]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VDI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Virtualization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows 7]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techagility.info/?p=370</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[***UPDATE*** Please check the comments below – but it appears I’m incorrect on the statement regarding Teradici PCoIP needing a PCI card, there is a SW/SW version in development and I’d be guessing this might be coming out sometime around VMworld as Beta? Just a guess on my part? So just as we headed in [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.techagility.info/2009/06/planning-a-desktop-virtualization-project-it-might-be-worth-making-sure-you-investigate-if-the-business-needs-a-remote-protocol-that-can-deliver-a-high-quality-user-experience/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Getting Citrix XenDesktop Receiver working on Windows XPe Thin Clients</title>
		<link>http://www.techagility.info/2009/06/getting-citrix-xendesktop-receiver-working-on-windows-xpe-thin-clients/</link>
		<comments>http://www.techagility.info/2009/06/getting-citrix-xendesktop-receiver-working-on-windows-xpe-thin-clients/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Jun 2009 04:19:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>dcaddick</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Citrix]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HP/Neoware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hardware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Thin Clients]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VDI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[XPe]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techagility.info/2009/06/getting-citrix-xendesktop-receiver-working-on-windows-xpe-thin-clients/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If installing Citrix XenDesktop Receiver on any HP Thin Client with Windows XPe *prior* to the most recent release (Build 710) you may get an error, even after removing the original Citrix Client, that it is unable to install because of a previous Citrix Client install still exists&#8230;  I didn’t really waste any time on [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.techagility.info/2009/06/getting-citrix-xendesktop-receiver-working-on-windows-xpe-thin-clients/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Updated performance testing for BL685c G6 in x64 Terminal Server/XenApp shows minimal overhead for Virtualization</title>
		<link>http://www.techagility.info/2009/06/updated-performance-testing-for-bl685c-g6-in-x64-terminal-serverxenapp-shows-minimal-overhead-for-virtualization/</link>
		<comments>http://www.techagility.info/2009/06/updated-performance-testing-for-bl685c-g6-in-x64-terminal-serverxenapp-shows-minimal-overhead-for-virtualization/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Jun 2009 21:58:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>dcaddick</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Citrix]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Performance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Virtualization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[XenApp]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[XenServer]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techagility.info/2009/06/updated-performance-testing-for-bl685c-g6-in-x64-terminal-serverxenapp-shows-minimal-overhead-for-virtualization/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I just wanted folks to know that there’s some new testing results out that would appear to indicate that with XenApp being virtualized on XenServer there is minimal overhead so long as you are not pushing the XenApp servers above 80% CPU &#60;snip&#62; A 4P/24C3 HP ProLiant BL685c G6 server blade equipped with the Six-Core [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.techagility.info/2009/06/updated-performance-testing-for-bl685c-g6-in-x64-terminal-serverxenapp-shows-minimal-overhead-for-virtualization/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>13</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Can VDI be delivered via a cheap OS Virtualization mechanism that might beat the mature Hypervisors on both price AND graphics performance?</title>
		<link>http://www.techagility.info/2008/12/can-vdi-be-delivered-via-a-cheap-os-virtualization-mechanism-that-might-beat-the-mature-hypervisors-on-both-price-and-graphics-performance/</link>
		<comments>http://www.techagility.info/2008/12/can-vdi-be-delivered-via-a-cheap-os-virtualization-mechanism-that-might-beat-the-mature-hypervisors-on-both-price-and-graphics-performance/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 2008 02:57:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>dcaddick</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blades]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Citrix]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hardware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Performance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Remote Protocols]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Thin Clients]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VDI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VMware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Virtualization]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techagility.info/2008/12/can-vdi-be-delivered-via-a-cheap-os-virtualization-mechanism-that-might-beat-the-mature-hypervisors-on-both-price-and-graphics-performance/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Well thanks to an article by Alessandro at virtualization.info I have become aware of a company called iCore Software that appear to be heading down the virtualization path similar to Parallels in that it is OS based Virtualization. iCore brings OS virtualization to the clients, selling its containers, called Virtual Accounts, as different user personalities [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.techagility.info/2008/12/can-vdi-be-delivered-via-a-cheap-os-virtualization-mechanism-that-might-beat-the-mature-hypervisors-on-both-price-and-graphics-performance/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Thinking of a Remote Computing Solution based on Citrix/VDI/BladePC&#8217;s? Make sure your Network is up to the task, or you might have curious issues?</title>
		<link>http://www.techagility.info/2008/12/thinking-of-a-remote-computing-solution-based-on-citrixvdibladepcs-make-sure-your-network-is-up-to-the-task-or-you-might-have-curious-issues/</link>
		<comments>http://www.techagility.info/2008/12/thinking-of-a-remote-computing-solution-based-on-citrixvdibladepcs-make-sure-your-network-is-up-to-the-task-or-you-might-have-curious-issues/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2008 10:41:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>dcaddick</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blades]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Citrix]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hardware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Networks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Performance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Remote Protocols]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Troubleshooting]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techagility.info/2008/12/thinking-of-a-remote-computing-solution-based-on-citrixvdibladepcs-make-sure-your-network-is-up-to-the-task-or-you-might-have-curious-issues/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Recently I found myself at a school down near Melbourne carrying out what should have been a relatively simple PoC (Proof of Concept) of 20 x BC2500 BladePC’s in an Enclosure with some T5730 Thin Clients, and initially all went pretty well and then I found that I had some issues with the SAM Registration [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.techagility.info/2008/12/thinking-of-a-remote-computing-solution-based-on-citrixvdibladepcs-make-sure-your-network-is-up-to-the-task-or-you-might-have-curious-issues/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Tips for installing XenApp 5.0 64bit on Server 2008 64bit (Release Preview) with screenshots</title>
		<link>http://www.techagility.info/2008/06/tips-for-installing-xenapp-50-64bit-on-server-2008-64bit-release-preview-with-screenshots-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.techagility.info/2008/06/tips-for-installing-xenapp-50-64bit-on-server-2008-64bit-release-preview-with-screenshots-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jun 2008 10:33:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>dcaddick</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Citrix]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Remote Protocols]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web/IIS/Web 2.0]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techagility.info/2008/06/tips-for-installing-xenapp-50-64bit-on-server-2008-64bit-release-preview-with-screenshots-2/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A few weeks back I was asked to setup a demo Server for the Citrix Synergy event here in Sydney that was to be XenApp 5.0 64bit (Delaware – Release Review) on a Server 2008 64bit installed on a DL680 Blade Server with 32Gb of RAM. Now it would have been nice to have had [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.techagility.info/2008/06/tips-for-installing-xenapp-50-64bit-on-server-2008-64bit-release-preview-with-screenshots-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Modifying RDP5 &amp; 6 to always connect local drives as well as USB devices&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://www.techagility.info/2008/06/modifying-rdp5-6-to-always-connect-local-drives-as-well-as-usb-devices-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.techagility.info/2008/06/modifying-rdp5-6-to-always-connect-local-drives-as-well-as-usb-devices-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jun 2008 10:31:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>dcaddick</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Citrix]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Remote Protocols]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techagility.info/2008/06/modifying-rdp5-6-to-always-connect-local-drives-as-well-as-usb-devices-2/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So if you have a look at the MSTSC.EXE file that starts the RDP session and use the /? to call further info from the component you get something very much like this: But if you dig a just a touch deeper you will find that the MS Terminal Services Client or RDP Client as [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.techagility.info/2008/06/modifying-rdp5-6-to-always-connect-local-drives-as-well-as-usb-devices-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Daylight Saving Time Again?</title>
		<link>http://www.techagility.info/2007/09/daylight-saving-time-again/</link>
		<comments>http://www.techagility.info/2007/09/daylight-saving-time-again/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Sep 2007 08:39:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>dcaddick</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blogging]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Citrix]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Remote Protocols]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VDI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VMware]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techagility.info/2007/09/25/daylight-saving-time-again/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[From the Windows XP Embedded Team, It seems like we just went through Daylight Saving Time (see this blog post), but that time of year is coming up again.&#xA0; To help customers prepare for the upcoming changes Microsoft is hosting a Technical Review webcast today at 2:00PM Pacific time: Technical Review for Daylight Saving Time [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.techagility.info/2007/09/daylight-saving-time-again/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Deciding which Thin Client is the best for your organization? Is there a new paradigm starting to play out?</title>
		<link>http://www.techagility.info/2007/07/deciding-which-thin-client-is-the-best-for-your-organization-is-there-a-new-paradigm-starting-to-play-out/</link>
		<comments>http://www.techagility.info/2007/07/deciding-which-thin-client-is-the-best-for-your-organization-is-there-a-new-paradigm-starting-to-play-out/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Jul 2007 10:35:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>dcaddick</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Citrix]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HP/Neoware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hardware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Linux]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Remote Protocols]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Thin Clients]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VDI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[XPe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[XenApp]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techagility.info/2007/07/deciding-which-thin-client-is-the-best-for-your-organization-is-there-a-new-paradigm-starting-to-play-out/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Deciding which Thin Client is good for you? So you are considering a Desktop Refresh in your organization? Are you aware of the impending &#34;Tipping Point&#34; where the difference between PC&#8217;s and Thin Clients is about to become blurred? Traditional Thinking: Traditional thinking around Thin Clients focus&#8217;s on the matrix between a choice of Hardware [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.techagility.info/2007/07/deciding-which-thin-client-is-the-best-for-your-organization-is-there-a-new-paradigm-starting-to-play-out/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Concept of DR (Disaster Recovery) is dead!</title>
		<link>http://www.techagility.info/2005/06/the-concept-of-dr-disaster-recovery-is-dead/</link>
		<comments>http://www.techagility.info/2005/06/the-concept-of-dr-disaster-recovery-is-dead/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jun 2005 07:54:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>dcaddick</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Citrix]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Networks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Virtualization]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techagility.info/2005/06/16/the-concept-of-dr-disaster-recovery-is-dead/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Concept of DR (Disaster Recovery) is dead! Pretty provocative statement? What do I mean by this? Typical Scenario Large sized Enterprises of 1,000 users or more have looked around at what they implement in IT Technology and realized at some point that, although they have done their best to eliminate any potential &#34;Single Points [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.techagility.info/2005/06/the-concept-of-dr-disaster-recovery-is-dead/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
