<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>TechAgility &#187; Hardware</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.techagility.info/category/hardware/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.techagility.info</link>
	<description>using Technology to become more Agile at work and play - and more thoughts on VDI, Thin Clients, VMware, Citrix, etc...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 28 Jul 2010 06:46:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Suspend/Resume suddenly started being non-responsive for HP 2540p</title>
		<link>http://www.techagility.info/2010/07/suspendresume-suddenly-started-being-non-responsive-for-hp-2540p/</link>
		<comments>http://www.techagility.info/2010/07/suspendresume-suddenly-started-being-non-responsive-for-hp-2540p/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jul 2010 06:46:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>dcaddick</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Hardware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Troubleshooting]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techagility.info/2010/07/suspendresume-suddenly-started-being-non-responsive-for-hp-2540p/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So the other day I realised that there was something very unusual happening to my HP 2540p – it has been blindingly fast, but just recently it seemed that it was on strike – I also found that it would effectively hang when trying to suspend. So it seemed that this was around the Power [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.techagility.info/2010/07/suspendresume-suddenly-started-being-non-responsive-for-hp-2540p/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Managing Thin Clients running Windows Embedded Standard (WES) 2009 from SCCM 2007 &#8211; is it possible?</title>
		<link>http://www.techagility.info/2010/05/managing-thin-clients-running-windows-embedded-standard-wes-2009-from-sccm-2007-is-it-possible/</link>
		<comments>http://www.techagility.info/2010/05/managing-thin-clients-running-windows-embedded-standard-wes-2009-from-sccm-2007-is-it-possible/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 May 2010 13:33:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>dcaddick</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Hardware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Thin Clients]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[XPe]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techagility.info/2010/05/managing-thin-clients-running-windows-embedded-standard-wes-2009-from-sccm-2007-is-it-possible/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I was recently looking for info regarding how to manage or integrate Windows Thin Clients (XPe/WES) with SCCM. To the best of my knowledge the formal stance has always been “we supply the Macro components to support SCCM Agents in the build – the rest is up to the Customer” and my understanding is that [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.techagility.info/2010/05/managing-thin-clients-running-windows-embedded-standard-wes-2009-from-sccm-2007-is-it-possible/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>So why wasn&#8217;t the phone working as it should? Always double-check ALL the settings? ;-)</title>
		<link>http://www.techagility.info/2010/05/so-why-wasnt-the-phone-working-as-it-should-always-double-check-all-the-settings/</link>
		<comments>http://www.techagility.info/2010/05/so-why-wasnt-the-phone-working-as-it-should-always-double-check-all-the-settings/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 May 2010 06:26:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>dcaddick</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blogging]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hardware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Networks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techagility.info/2010/05/so-why-wasnt-the-phone-working-as-it-should-always-double-check-all-the-settings/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So a little while back I had noticed that the Netgear DG834N that I had been using was getting quite hot at times with regards to the 240V Brick power supply – it even needed to be turned off at times to let it cool. So I hunted around and then decided to replace it [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.techagility.info/2010/05/so-why-wasnt-the-phone-working-as-it-should-always-double-check-all-the-settings/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Installing WES 2011 CTP2 on a VM &#8211; it&#8217;s likely that 2Gb Flash will be sufficient? If you want Windows 7, and only 1.5Gb &#8211; will this be *THE* VDI base OS of choice?</title>
		<link>http://www.techagility.info/2010/01/installing-wes-2011-ctp2-on-a-vm-its-likely-that-2gb-flash-will-be-sufficient-but-will-mss-licensing-allow-upgrades/</link>
		<comments>http://www.techagility.info/2010/01/installing-wes-2011-ctp2-on-a-vm-its-likely-that-2gb-flash-will-be-sufficient-but-will-mss-licensing-allow-upgrades/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jan 2010 05:48:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>dcaddick</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Fun and Cool Stuff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hardware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Remote Protocols]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Thin Clients]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VDI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VMware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Virtualization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows 7]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[XPe]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techagility.info/2010/01/installing-wes-2011-ctp2-on-a-vm-its-likely-that-2gb-flash-will-be-sufficient-but-will-mss-licensing-allow-upgrades/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Just a brief update as to some of the changes that I have discovered in WES 2011 CTP2 (as opposed to the original CTP) – this was simply built on a default VM Template based on Windows 7. Also some useful reference links: Windows Embedded Standard 2011 CTP2 New Features and Changes Discovering Windows Embedded [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.techagility.info/2010/01/installing-wes-2011-ctp2-on-a-vm-its-likely-that-2gb-flash-will-be-sufficient-but-will-mss-licensing-allow-upgrades/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Trying to download and install LG&#8217;s WM 6.5 ROM update to GM730f &#8211; using Windows 7 and/or XP Pro &#8211; Good Luck!</title>
		<link>http://www.techagility.info/2010/01/trying-to-install-lgs-wm6-5-update-to-gm730f-using-windows-7-andor-xp-pro-good-luck/</link>
		<comments>http://www.techagility.info/2010/01/trying-to-install-lgs-wm6-5-update-to-gm730f-using-windows-7-andor-xp-pro-good-luck/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Jan 2010 04:40:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>dcaddick</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Fun and Cool Stuff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hardware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Smartphones]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Troubleshooting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows 7]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techagility.info/2010/01/trying-to-install-lgs-wm6-5-update-to-gm730f-using-windows-7-andor-xp-pro-good-luck/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[***UPDATE*** If you would like to follow this – check the discussion at XDA Developers I recently purchased an LG GM730f as a new mobile – specifically because I thought the form factor was quite good, it also used a microUSB as a connector AND it was being advertised as being able to be updated [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.techagility.info/2010/01/trying-to-install-lgs-wm6-5-update-to-gm730f-using-windows-7-andor-xp-pro-good-luck/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Top 10 business technology trends for 2010 from SMH.com.au &#8211; with additional 2 cents :-)</title>
		<link>http://www.techagility.info/2009/12/top-10-business-technology-trends-for-2010-from-smh-com-au-with-additional-2-cents/</link>
		<comments>http://www.techagility.info/2009/12/top-10-business-technology-trends-for-2010-from-smh-com-au-with-additional-2-cents/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Dec 2009 11:44:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>dcaddick</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blogging]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hardware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Performance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VDI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Virtualization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows 7]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techagility.info/2009/12/top-10-business-technology-trends-for-2010-from-smh-com-au-with-additional-2-cents/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Now I don’t always figure that the local Newspaper is going to be a good place to pick up this sort of info, but in this case I think Simon from the Sydney Morning Herald has done more than just a decent job – so for what it’s worth I&#8217;m reposting but add my 2 [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.techagility.info/2009/12/top-10-business-technology-trends-for-2010-from-smh-com-au-with-additional-2-cents/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Some recent comments around Client Virtualization, View, XenDesktop, Remote Protocols,etc&#8230; now that VMworld 2009 has been and gone</title>
		<link>http://www.techagility.info/2009/09/some-recent-comments-around-client-virtualization-view-xendesktop-remote-protocolsetc-now-that-vmworld-2009-has-been-and-gone/</link>
		<comments>http://www.techagility.info/2009/09/some-recent-comments-around-client-virtualization-view-xendesktop-remote-protocolsetc-now-that-vmworld-2009-has-been-and-gone/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Sep 2009 01:54:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>dcaddick</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blades]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Citrix]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hardware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Remote Protocols]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Thin Clients]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VDI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VMware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Virtualization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[XenApp]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[XenServer]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techagility.info/2009/09/some-recent-comments-around-client-virtualization-view-xendesktop-remote-protocolsetc-now-that-vmworld-2009-has-been-and-gone/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The best piece I have read from the IT Industry in the last two weeks or so is: Why desktop virtualization projects fail Desktop virtualization is one of the hottest topics of interest and a major initiative of many companies. Touted benefits include lower operating costs, simpler management and desktop mobility. Below we’ll explore what [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.techagility.info/2009/09/some-recent-comments-around-client-virtualization-view-xendesktop-remote-protocolsetc-now-that-vmworld-2009-has-been-and-gone/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>10</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>If you are seeing issues relating to Hardware after installing Windows 7 do not forget to check the BIOS is up to date?</title>
		<link>http://www.techagility.info/2009/09/if-you-are-seeing-issues-relating-to-hardware-after-installing-windows-7-do-not-forget-to-check-the-bios-is-up-to-date/</link>
		<comments>http://www.techagility.info/2009/09/if-you-are-seeing-issues-relating-to-hardware-after-installing-windows-7-do-not-forget-to-check-the-bios-is-up-to-date/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Sep 2009 10:52:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>dcaddick</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Hardware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Performance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Troubleshooting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows 7]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techagility.info/2009/09/if-you-are-seeing-issues-relating-to-hardware-after-installing-windows-7-do-not-forget-to-check-the-bios-is-up-to-date/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It seems that although I have been running various early releases of Windows 7 since around late January I have had no real problems at all – but just prior to being out of the office for an event I found a few issues: VPN wasn’t working for some reason I didn’t have the time [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.techagility.info/2009/09/if-you-are-seeing-issues-relating-to-hardware-after-installing-windows-7-do-not-forget-to-check-the-bios-is-up-to-date/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>I have been chasing Network issues lately and have come across these very useful *FREE* Tools that both work under Windows 7</title>
		<link>http://www.techagility.info/2009/08/i-have-been-chasing-network-issues-lately-and-have-come-across-these-very-useful-free-tools-that-both-work-under-windows-7/</link>
		<comments>http://www.techagility.info/2009/08/i-have-been-chasing-network-issues-lately-and-have-come-across-these-very-useful-free-tools-that-both-work-under-windows-7/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Aug 2009 01:45:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>dcaddick</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Hardware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Networks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Performance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Remote Protocols]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Thin Clients]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Troubleshooting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vista]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WiFi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows 7]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[XPe]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techagility.info/2009/08/i-have-been-chasing-network-issues-lately-and-have-come-across-these-very-useful-free-tools-that-both-work-under-windows-7/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Some while back one of my US based colleagues passed on some advice about checking out some details on how to get the best out of Wireshark For anyone interested in getting their feet wet using Wireshark the network protocol analyzer.&#160; This knowledge can be useful to have when dealing with network anomalies. www.chappellseminars.com/s-wireshark101.html Download [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.techagility.info/2009/08/i-have-been-chasing-network-issues-lately-and-have-come-across-these-very-useful-free-tools-that-both-work-under-windows-7/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>22</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>HP&#8217;s range of Linux Thin Clients getting a refresh?</title>
		<link>http://www.techagility.info/2009/08/hps-range-of-linux-thin-clients-getting-a-refresh/</link>
		<comments>http://www.techagility.info/2009/08/hps-range-of-linux-thin-clients-getting-a-refresh/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Aug 2009 11:52:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>dcaddick</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Citrix]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HP/Neoware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hardware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Linux]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Thin Clients]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VDI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[XenApp]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techagility.info/2009/08/hps-range-of-linux-thin-clients-getting-a-refresh/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So some of you may be aware that the new T5545 was released some while back with a new O/S designated ThinPro – this has recently been updated with a new release of Build 31 and now looks a little like this in Admin mode: To switch to Admin mode there is a simple menu [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.techagility.info/2009/08/hps-range-of-linux-thin-clients-getting-a-refresh/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>HP reference configuration for Citrix XenApp: 1,500 Microsoft Office 2003 users on HP ProLiant BL460c G6 server blades</title>
		<link>http://www.techagility.info/2009/06/hp-reference-configuration-for-citrix-xenapp-1500-microsoft-office-2003-users-on-hp-proliant-bl460c-g6-server-blades/</link>
		<comments>http://www.techagility.info/2009/06/hp-reference-configuration-for-citrix-xenapp-1500-microsoft-office-2003-users-on-hp-proliant-bl460c-g6-server-blades/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2009 01:42:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>dcaddick</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Citrix]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HP/Neoware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hardware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Virtualization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[XenApp]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techagility.info/2009/06/hp-reference-configuration-for-citrix-xenapp-1500-microsoft-office-2003-users-on-hp-proliant-bl460c-g6-server-blades/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Just like London Buses, you wait around for ages, and then they all turn up at once? (Whitepapers, that is?) HP reference configuration for Citrix XenApp: 1,500 Microsoft Office 2003 users on HP ProLiant BL460c G6 server blades This document illustrates multiple blades configurations using bare-metal configurations and converting them to virtualized ones.&#160; The goal [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.techagility.info/2009/06/hp-reference-configuration-for-citrix-xenapp-1500-microsoft-office-2003-users-on-hp-proliant-bl460c-g6-server-blades/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Getting Citrix XenDesktop Receiver working on Windows XPe Thin Clients</title>
		<link>http://www.techagility.info/2009/06/getting-citrix-xendesktop-receiver-working-on-windows-xpe-thin-clients/</link>
		<comments>http://www.techagility.info/2009/06/getting-citrix-xendesktop-receiver-working-on-windows-xpe-thin-clients/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Jun 2009 04:19:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>dcaddick</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Citrix]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HP/Neoware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hardware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Thin Clients]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VDI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[XPe]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techagility.info/2009/06/getting-citrix-xendesktop-receiver-working-on-windows-xpe-thin-clients/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If installing Citrix XenDesktop Receiver on any HP Thin Client with Windows XPe *prior* to the most recent release (Build 710) you may get an error, even after removing the original Citrix Client, that it is unable to install because of a previous Citrix Client install still exists&#8230;  I didn’t really waste any time on [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.techagility.info/2009/06/getting-citrix-xendesktop-receiver-working-on-windows-xpe-thin-clients/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>TCO/ROI calculations for Thin Clients</title>
		<link>http://www.techagility.info/2009/05/tcoroi-calculations-for-thin-clients/</link>
		<comments>http://www.techagility.info/2009/05/tcoroi-calculations-for-thin-clients/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 May 2009 05:09:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>dcaddick</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Hardware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Thin Clients]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VDI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Virtualization]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techagility.info/2009/05/tcoroi-calculations-for-thin-clients/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I was asked an interesting question at Tech@Work last week here in Sydney – I was asked by someone from Local Govt. where they could find TCO or ROI Calculators for justifying the purchase of Thin Clients. This chap also wanted know where the break-even cost was for implementing Thin Clients? So after chatting to [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.techagility.info/2009/05/tcoroi-calculations-for-thin-clients/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>17</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Living with Windows 7 in a live production environment &#8211; 3 days in how does it feel?</title>
		<link>http://www.techagility.info/2009/01/living-with-windows-7-in-a-live-production-environment-3-days-in-how-does-it-feel/</link>
		<comments>http://www.techagility.info/2009/01/living-with-windows-7-in-a-live-production-environment-3-days-in-how-does-it-feel/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jan 2009 12:17:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>dcaddick</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[HP/Neoware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hardware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Performance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Virtualization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows 7]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techagility.info/2009/01/living-with-windows-7-in-a-live-production-environment-3-days-in-how-does-it-feel/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Over here in Australia we had a long weekend last week so I have only been using Windows 7 for three days so far, but for anyone else who has tried it on a Virtual Machine, I’d suggest they give it a try on the hardware – it’s not that bad at all – my [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.techagility.info/2009/01/living-with-windows-7-in-a-live-production-environment-3-days-in-how-does-it-feel/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Sony Picturebook revisited? Now the new Sony VAIO P steps up to the plate and it&#8217;s already been dismantled to display the workings.</title>
		<link>http://www.techagility.info/2009/01/sony-picturebook-revisited-now-the-new-sony-vaio-p-steps-up-to-the-plate-and-its-already-been-dismantled-to-display-the-workings/</link>
		<comments>http://www.techagility.info/2009/01/sony-picturebook-revisited-now-the-new-sony-vaio-p-steps-up-to-the-plate-and-its-already-been-dismantled-to-display-the-workings/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Jan 2009 11:59:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>dcaddick</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Hardware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Performance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows 7]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techagility.info/2009/01/sony-picturebook-revisited-now-the-new-sony-vaio-p-steps-up-to-the-plate-and-its-already-been-dismantled-to-display-the-workings/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So back in it’s day (around 2002?) I was very sorely tempted to purchase one of the Sony Picture books, but in the end I opted for the more traditional 505 with it’s 10.5” screen and more traditional layout: Sony VAIO C1MW PictureBook Notebook 120 GB hard drive, 13.3 in. display, Released: Jan 02 &#34;For [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.techagility.info/2009/01/sony-picturebook-revisited-now-the-new-sony-vaio-p-steps-up-to-the-plate-and-its-already-been-dismantled-to-display-the-workings/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Installing Altiris DS or HP&#8217;s Rapid Deployment Pack and having issues with getting PXE working &#8211; hopefully this info might help?</title>
		<link>http://www.techagility.info/2009/01/installing-altiris-ds-or-hps-rapid-deployment-pack-and-having-issues-with-getting-pxe-working-hopefully-this-info-might-help/</link>
		<comments>http://www.techagility.info/2009/01/installing-altiris-ds-or-hps-rapid-deployment-pack-and-having-issues-with-getting-pxe-working-hopefully-this-info-might-help/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Jan 2009 10:16:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>dcaddick</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blades]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HP/Neoware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hardware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Networks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Remote Protocols]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Troubleshooting]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techagility.info/2009/01/installing-altiris-ds-or-hps-rapid-deployment-pack-and-having-issues-with-getting-pxe-working-hopefully-this-info-might-help/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A colleague of mine was after some info on a tool that I had mentioned before and while I was at it I had some extra tools and links and other handy stuff that I thought I’d share? The details regarding Fixed Mode below have proven to be very useful today in getting PXE working [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.techagility.info/2009/01/installing-altiris-ds-or-hps-rapid-deployment-pack-and-having-issues-with-getting-pxe-working-hopefully-this-info-might-help/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Can VDI be delivered via a cheap OS Virtualization mechanism that might beat the mature Hypervisors on both price AND graphics performance?</title>
		<link>http://www.techagility.info/2008/12/can-vdi-be-delivered-via-a-cheap-os-virtualization-mechanism-that-might-beat-the-mature-hypervisors-on-both-price-and-graphics-performance/</link>
		<comments>http://www.techagility.info/2008/12/can-vdi-be-delivered-via-a-cheap-os-virtualization-mechanism-that-might-beat-the-mature-hypervisors-on-both-price-and-graphics-performance/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 2008 02:57:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>dcaddick</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blades]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Citrix]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hardware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Performance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Remote Protocols]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Thin Clients]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VDI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VMware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Virtualization]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techagility.info/2008/12/can-vdi-be-delivered-via-a-cheap-os-virtualization-mechanism-that-might-beat-the-mature-hypervisors-on-both-price-and-graphics-performance/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Well thanks to an article by Alessandro at virtualization.info I have become aware of a company called iCore Software that appear to be heading down the virtualization path similar to Parallels in that it is OS based Virtualization. iCore brings OS virtualization to the clients, selling its containers, called Virtual Accounts, as different user personalities [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.techagility.info/2008/12/can-vdi-be-delivered-via-a-cheap-os-virtualization-mechanism-that-might-beat-the-mature-hypervisors-on-both-price-and-graphics-performance/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Windows 7 Beta out early in the new year, has Microsoft accelerated the schedule to overcome the bad perception of Vista?</title>
		<link>http://www.techagility.info/2008/12/windows-7-beta-out-early-in-the-new-year-has-microsoft-accelerated-the-schedule-to-overcome-the-bad-perception-of-vista/</link>
		<comments>http://www.techagility.info/2008/12/windows-7-beta-out-early-in-the-new-year-has-microsoft-accelerated-the-schedule-to-overcome-the-bad-perception-of-vista/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Dec 2008 13:33:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>dcaddick</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Hardware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Performance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Troubleshooting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vista]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows 7]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techagility.info/2008/12/windows-7-beta-out-early-in-the-new-year-has-microsoft-accelerated-the-schedule-to-overcome-the-bad-perception-of-vista/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Interesting? I’m already running an earlier release of Windows 7 under VMware Workstation as described in an earlier post so it’s good to hear that the Beta will be out shortly as this will put the code through a more vigorous round of testing and should seriously shake the bugs out? Although the latest update [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.techagility.info/2008/12/windows-7-beta-out-early-in-the-new-year-has-microsoft-accelerated-the-schedule-to-overcome-the-bad-perception-of-vista/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Thinking of a Remote Computing Solution based on Citrix/VDI/BladePC&#8217;s? Make sure your Network is up to the task, or you might have curious issues?</title>
		<link>http://www.techagility.info/2008/12/thinking-of-a-remote-computing-solution-based-on-citrixvdibladepcs-make-sure-your-network-is-up-to-the-task-or-you-might-have-curious-issues/</link>
		<comments>http://www.techagility.info/2008/12/thinking-of-a-remote-computing-solution-based-on-citrixvdibladepcs-make-sure-your-network-is-up-to-the-task-or-you-might-have-curious-issues/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2008 10:41:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>dcaddick</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blades]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Citrix]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hardware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Networks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Performance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Remote Protocols]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Troubleshooting]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techagility.info/2008/12/thinking-of-a-remote-computing-solution-based-on-citrixvdibladepcs-make-sure-your-network-is-up-to-the-task-or-you-might-have-curious-issues/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Recently I found myself at a school down near Melbourne carrying out what should have been a relatively simple PoC (Proof of Concept) of 20 x BC2500 BladePC’s in an Enclosure with some T5730 Thin Clients, and initially all went pretty well and then I found that I had some issues with the SAM Registration [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.techagility.info/2008/12/thinking-of-a-remote-computing-solution-based-on-citrixvdibladepcs-make-sure-your-network-is-up-to-the-task-or-you-might-have-curious-issues/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Tips for installing XenApp 5.0 64bit on Server 2008 64bit (Release Preview) with screenshots</title>
		<link>http://www.techagility.info/2008/06/tips-for-installing-xenapp-50-64bit-on-server-2008-64bit-release-preview-with-screenshots/</link>
		<comments>http://www.techagility.info/2008/06/tips-for-installing-xenapp-50-64bit-on-server-2008-64bit-release-preview-with-screenshots/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jun 2008 12:31:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>dcaddick</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blogging]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hardware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Performance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Troubleshooting]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techagility.info/2008/06/24/tips-for-installing-xenapp-50-64bit-on-server-2008-64bit-release-preview-with-screenshots/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A few weeks back I was asked to setup a demo Server for the Citrix Synergy event here in Sydney that was to be XenApp 5.0 64bit (Delaware – Release Review) on a Server 2008 64bit installed on a DL680 Blade Server with 32Gb of RAM. Now it would have been nice to have had [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.techagility.info/2008/06/tips-for-installing-xenapp-50-64bit-on-server-2008-64bit-release-preview-with-screenshots/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
