<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>TechAgility &#187; HP/Neoware</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.techagility.info/category/hpneoware/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.techagility.info</link>
	<description>using Technology to become more Agile at work and play - and more thoughts on VDI, Thin Clients, VMware, Citrix, etc...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 28 Jul 2010 06:46:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Looking deeper in to the T5545 ThinPro Linux Thin Client from HP &#8211; and how to tweak it and make deployments a breeze?</title>
		<link>http://www.techagility.info/2009/10/looking-deeper-in-to-the-t5545-thinpro-linux-thin-client-from-hp-and-how-to-tweak-it-and-make-deployments-a-breeze/</link>
		<comments>http://www.techagility.info/2009/10/looking-deeper-in-to-the-t5545-thinpro-linux-thin-client-from-hp-and-how-to-tweak-it-and-make-deployments-a-breeze/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Oct 2009 13:26:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>dcaddick</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Citrix]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HP/Neoware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Linux]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Thin Clients]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VDI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[XenApp]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techagility.info/2009/10/looking-deeper-in-to-the-t5545-thinpro-linux-thin-client-from-hp-and-how-to-tweak-it-and-make-deployments-a-breeze/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The T5545 Thin Client from HP is quite a neat mid-range device that has some nice features that can make your life quite easy, but so far it seems that it’s not all that easy to find out how to go about tweaking it to your environment and users? I’ll update this later with some [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.techagility.info/2009/10/looking-deeper-in-to-the-t5545-thinpro-linux-thin-client-from-hp-and-how-to-tweak-it-and-make-deployments-a-breeze/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>HP&#8217;s range of Linux Thin Clients getting a refresh?</title>
		<link>http://www.techagility.info/2009/08/hps-range-of-linux-thin-clients-getting-a-refresh/</link>
		<comments>http://www.techagility.info/2009/08/hps-range-of-linux-thin-clients-getting-a-refresh/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Aug 2009 11:52:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>dcaddick</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Citrix]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HP/Neoware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hardware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Linux]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Thin Clients]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VDI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[XenApp]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techagility.info/2009/08/hps-range-of-linux-thin-clients-getting-a-refresh/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So some of you may be aware that the new T5545 was released some while back with a new O/S designated ThinPro – this has recently been updated with a new release of Build 31 and now looks a little like this in Admin mode: To switch to Admin mode there is a simple menu [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.techagility.info/2009/08/hps-range-of-linux-thin-clients-getting-a-refresh/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>HP reference configuration for Citrix XenApp: 1,500 Microsoft Office 2003 users on HP ProLiant BL460c G6 server blades</title>
		<link>http://www.techagility.info/2009/06/hp-reference-configuration-for-citrix-xenapp-1500-microsoft-office-2003-users-on-hp-proliant-bl460c-g6-server-blades/</link>
		<comments>http://www.techagility.info/2009/06/hp-reference-configuration-for-citrix-xenapp-1500-microsoft-office-2003-users-on-hp-proliant-bl460c-g6-server-blades/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2009 01:42:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>dcaddick</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Citrix]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HP/Neoware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hardware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Virtualization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[XenApp]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techagility.info/2009/06/hp-reference-configuration-for-citrix-xenapp-1500-microsoft-office-2003-users-on-hp-proliant-bl460c-g6-server-blades/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Just like London Buses, you wait around for ages, and then they all turn up at once? (Whitepapers, that is?) HP reference configuration for Citrix XenApp: 1,500 Microsoft Office 2003 users on HP ProLiant BL460c G6 server blades This document illustrates multiple blades configurations using bare-metal configurations and converting them to virtualized ones.&#160; The goal [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.techagility.info/2009/06/hp-reference-configuration-for-citrix-xenapp-1500-microsoft-office-2003-users-on-hp-proliant-bl460c-g6-server-blades/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>New Whitepapers from HP about how to Automate Citrix XenApp on XenServer with Powershell scripts, etc.</title>
		<link>http://www.techagility.info/2009/06/new-whitepapers-from-hp-about-how-to-automate-citrix-xenapp-on-xenserver-with-powershell-scripts-etc/</link>
		<comments>http://www.techagility.info/2009/06/new-whitepapers-from-hp-about-how-to-automate-citrix-xenapp-on-xenserver-with-powershell-scripts-etc/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Jun 2009 22:46:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>dcaddick</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blades]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Citrix]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HP/Neoware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Performance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Virtualization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[XenApp]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[XenServer]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techagility.info/2009/06/new-whitepapers-from-hp-about-how-to-automate-citrix-xenapp-on-xenserver-with-powershell-scripts-etc/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[**UPDATE** I have received the following comment: has anyone had any luck with the Automating Citrix Xenapp whitepaper, as i have issues when trying to import the deploy XenServer Altiris job as both .bin files seem to contain the same jobs, which are for deploying clients. And yes this is the case – I have [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.techagility.info/2009/06/new-whitepapers-from-hp-about-how-to-automate-citrix-xenapp-on-xenserver-with-powershell-scripts-etc/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Planning a Desktop Virtualization project? &#8211; it might be worth making sure you investigate if the Business needs a Remote Protocol that can deliver a &#8220;High Quality User Experience&#8221;? Is RDP7 up to it?</title>
		<link>http://www.techagility.info/2009/06/planning-a-desktop-virtualization-project-it-might-be-worth-making-sure-you-investigate-if-the-business-needs-a-remote-protocol-that-can-deliver-a-high-quality-user-experience/</link>
		<comments>http://www.techagility.info/2009/06/planning-a-desktop-virtualization-project-it-might-be-worth-making-sure-you-investigate-if-the-business-needs-a-remote-protocol-that-can-deliver-a-high-quality-user-experience/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Jun 2009 11:08:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>dcaddick</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Citrix]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HP/Neoware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Networks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Performance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Remote Protocols]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Thin Clients]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VDI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Virtualization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows 7]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techagility.info/?p=370</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[***UPDATE*** Please check the comments below – but it appears I’m incorrect on the statement regarding Teradici PCoIP needing a PCI card, there is a SW/SW version in development and I’d be guessing this might be coming out sometime around VMworld as Beta? Just a guess on my part? So just as we headed in [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.techagility.info/2009/06/planning-a-desktop-virtualization-project-it-might-be-worth-making-sure-you-investigate-if-the-business-needs-a-remote-protocol-that-can-deliver-a-high-quality-user-experience/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Getting Citrix XenDesktop Receiver working on Windows XPe Thin Clients</title>
		<link>http://www.techagility.info/2009/06/getting-citrix-xendesktop-receiver-working-on-windows-xpe-thin-clients/</link>
		<comments>http://www.techagility.info/2009/06/getting-citrix-xendesktop-receiver-working-on-windows-xpe-thin-clients/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Jun 2009 04:19:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>dcaddick</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Citrix]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HP/Neoware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hardware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Thin Clients]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VDI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[XPe]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techagility.info/2009/06/getting-citrix-xendesktop-receiver-working-on-windows-xpe-thin-clients/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If installing Citrix XenDesktop Receiver on any HP Thin Client with Windows XPe *prior* to the most recent release (Build 710) you may get an error, even after removing the original Citrix Client, that it is unable to install because of a previous Citrix Client install still exists&#8230;  I didn’t really waste any time on [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.techagility.info/2009/06/getting-citrix-xendesktop-receiver-working-on-windows-xpe-thin-clients/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Getting Citrix Printing working with the T5735 Thin Client</title>
		<link>http://www.techagility.info/2009/06/getting-citrix-printing-working-with-the-t5735-thin-client/</link>
		<comments>http://www.techagility.info/2009/06/getting-citrix-printing-working-with-the-t5735-thin-client/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2009 04:30:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>dcaddick</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[HP/Neoware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Linux]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Thin Clients]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techagility.info/2009/06/getting-citrix-printing-working-with-the-t5735-thin-client/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Essentially, the printer needs to be configured locally first, pretty much the same way you have it now. There’s additional information, with screen shots on how to configure this for ICA starting page 22 of the attached guide: http://bizsupport2.austin.hp.com/bc/docs/support/SupportManual/c01367435/c01367435.pdf I’ve also reference a guide to supported HP printers with Citrix, just in case: http://h20195.www2.hp.com/v2/GetPDF.aspx/4AA0-8465ENW.pdf]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.techagility.info/2009/06/getting-citrix-printing-working-with-the-t5735-thin-client/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Living with Windows 7 in a live production environment &#8211; 3 days in how does it feel?</title>
		<link>http://www.techagility.info/2009/01/living-with-windows-7-in-a-live-production-environment-3-days-in-how-does-it-feel/</link>
		<comments>http://www.techagility.info/2009/01/living-with-windows-7-in-a-live-production-environment-3-days-in-how-does-it-feel/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jan 2009 12:17:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>dcaddick</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[HP/Neoware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hardware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Performance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Virtualization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows 7]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techagility.info/2009/01/living-with-windows-7-in-a-live-production-environment-3-days-in-how-does-it-feel/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Over here in Australia we had a long weekend last week so I have only been using Windows 7 for three days so far, but for anyone else who has tried it on a Virtual Machine, I’d suggest they give it a try on the hardware – it’s not that bad at all – my [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.techagility.info/2009/01/living-with-windows-7-in-a-live-production-environment-3-days-in-how-does-it-feel/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Installing Altiris DS or HP&#8217;s Rapid Deployment Pack and having issues with getting PXE working &#8211; hopefully this info might help?</title>
		<link>http://www.techagility.info/2009/01/installing-altiris-ds-or-hps-rapid-deployment-pack-and-having-issues-with-getting-pxe-working-hopefully-this-info-might-help/</link>
		<comments>http://www.techagility.info/2009/01/installing-altiris-ds-or-hps-rapid-deployment-pack-and-having-issues-with-getting-pxe-working-hopefully-this-info-might-help/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Jan 2009 10:16:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>dcaddick</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blades]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HP/Neoware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hardware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Networks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Remote Protocols]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Troubleshooting]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techagility.info/2009/01/installing-altiris-ds-or-hps-rapid-deployment-pack-and-having-issues-with-getting-pxe-working-hopefully-this-info-might-help/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A colleague of mine was after some info on a tool that I had mentioned before and while I was at it I had some extra tools and links and other handy stuff that I thought I’d share? The details regarding Fixed Mode below have proven to be very useful today in getting PXE working [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.techagility.info/2009/01/installing-altiris-ds-or-hps-rapid-deployment-pack-and-having-issues-with-getting-pxe-working-hopefully-this-info-might-help/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Everything you wanted to know about FBWF but were afraid to ask? Including how it might be made to work on XP Pro&#8230;..</title>
		<link>http://www.techagility.info/2008/12/everything-you-wanted-to-know-about-fbwf-but-were-afraid-to-ask-including-how-it-might-be-made-to-work-on-xp-pro/</link>
		<comments>http://www.techagility.info/2008/12/everything-you-wanted-to-know-about-fbwf-but-were-afraid-to-ask-including-how-it-might-be-made-to-work-on-xp-pro/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Dec 2008 03:23:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>dcaddick</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[HP/Neoware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hacking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Thin Clients]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[XPe]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techagility.info/2008/12/everything-you-wanted-to-know-about-fbwf-but-were-afraid-to-ask-including-how-it-might-be-made-to-work-on-xp-pro/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So I have been asked a few questions regarding FBWF (File Based Write Filter) in the last few days and thought this might also be useful to others? By default in XP Embedded there is a component called EWF (Enhanced Write Filter) that acts as an overlay to catch actions that require write access like [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.techagility.info/2008/12/everything-you-wanted-to-know-about-fbwf-but-were-afraid-to-ask-including-how-it-might-be-made-to-work-on-xp-pro/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Renaming a Computer or Thin Client for large scale deployments? Whether you are using Altiris, PXE, RIS, SMS, etc. this is a tool worth checking out</title>
		<link>http://www.techagility.info/2008/06/renaming-a-computer-or-thin-client-for-large-scale-deployments-whether-you-are-using-altiris-pxe-ris-sms-etc-this-is-a-tool-worth-checking-out/</link>
		<comments>http://www.techagility.info/2008/06/renaming-a-computer-or-thin-client-for-large-scale-deployments-whether-you-are-using-altiris-pxe-ris-sms-etc-this-is-a-tool-worth-checking-out/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jun 2008 11:19:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>dcaddick</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blogging]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HP/Neoware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Thin Clients]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techagility.info/2008/06/24/renaming-a-computer-or-thin-client-for-large-scale-deployments-whether-you-are-using-altiris-pxe-ris-sms-etc-this-is-a-tool-worth-checking-out/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[While the deployment we were assisting with today was maybe not that large even by local standards the issue was something that comes up on a some what regular basis. A customer wants to have a number of Thin Clients imaged to their specifications and then drop-shipped to various locations ready to go. Part of [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.techagility.info/2008/06/renaming-a-computer-or-thin-client-for-large-scale-deployments-whether-you-are-using-altiris-pxe-ris-sms-etc-this-is-a-tool-worth-checking-out/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Disclaimer&#8230;&#8230;..</title>
		<link>http://www.techagility.info/2008/06/disclaimer/</link>
		<comments>http://www.techagility.info/2008/06/disclaimer/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jun 2008 13:25:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>dcaddick</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blogging]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HP/Neoware]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techagility.info/2008/06/12/disclaimer/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I have an old blog site at www.geekswithblogs.net/wallabyfan as well as the new one at www.techagility.info and things have been very quiet for the last three weeks or so as I have been under something of a cloud. It would appear that at some stage I may have inadvertently upset someone with one of my [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.techagility.info/2008/06/disclaimer/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Microsoft embedded OS&#8217;s &#8211; where to next? Do we really want Vista embedded?</title>
		<link>http://www.techagility.info/2007/10/microsoft-embedded-oss-where-to-next-do-we-really-want-vista-embedded/</link>
		<comments>http://www.techagility.info/2007/10/microsoft-embedded-oss-where-to-next-do-we-really-want-vista-embedded/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Oct 2007 13:27:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>dcaddick</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[App Streaming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Blogging]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HP/Neoware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hardware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Thin Clients]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techagility.info/2007/10/10/microsoft-embedded-oss-where-to-next-do-we-really-want-vista-embedded/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Well it&#8217;s not much of a surprise that we&#8217;re not likely to see a replacement for Windows XPe any time soon? Well apart from an update based on SP3, but clearly it&#8217;s going to be some time before we see Vista based version of embedded? But I must confess that while reading through some of [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.techagility.info/2007/10/microsoft-embedded-oss-where-to-next-do-we-really-want-vista-embedded/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Neoware e900 Thin Client Not Appropriate for Elementary School Students</title>
		<link>http://www.techagility.info/2007/10/neoware-e900-thin-client-not-appropriate-for-elementary-school-students/</link>
		<comments>http://www.techagility.info/2007/10/neoware-e900-thin-client-not-appropriate-for-elementary-school-students/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Oct 2007 21:47:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>dcaddick</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[HP/Neoware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hardware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Thin Clients]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techagility.info/2007/10/03/neoware-e900-thin-client-not-appropriate-for-elementary-school-students/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As you may or may not know Neoware has a Thin Client called the e900 that is very rugged in an alloy housing that is capable of withstanding shock, water, dust etc. &#8211; BUT one thing it&#8217;s not, is portable, unless of course you are someone like WalMart with a large distribution chain and mount [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.techagility.info/2007/10/neoware-e900-thin-client-not-appropriate-for-elementary-school-students/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>HP BladeSystem c3000 for SMB&#8217;s</title>
		<link>http://www.techagility.info/2007/09/hp-bladesystem-c3000-for-smbs/</link>
		<comments>http://www.techagility.info/2007/09/hp-bladesystem-c3000-for-smbs/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Sep 2007 22:40:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>dcaddick</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[HP/Neoware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hardware]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techagility.info/2007/09/14/hp-bladesystem-c3000-for-smbs/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Something very interesting came across the desk today that looks very neat for the SMB space HP challenges Dell in the SME market Colin Barker ZDNet.co.uk After Michael Dell on Monday launched his company&#8217;s first storage system targeted at small and medium-sized enterprises, HP responded with a system of its own on Wednesday. Both systems [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.techagility.info/2007/09/hp-bladesystem-c3000-for-smbs/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Greenfield design &#8211; should you use Terminal Server/Citrix or VMware&#8217;s VDI?</title>
		<link>http://www.techagility.info/2007/08/greenfield-design-should-you-use-terminal-servercitrix-or-vmwares-vdi/</link>
		<comments>http://www.techagility.info/2007/08/greenfield-design-should-you-use-terminal-servercitrix-or-vmwares-vdi/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Aug 2007 23:03:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>dcaddick</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blogging]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HP/Neoware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techagility.info/2007/08/14/greenfield-design-should-you-use-terminal-servercitrix-or-vmwares-vdi/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So&#x2026;. Question? Would I use TS/Citrix or would I use VDI if I was building or designing the Front-Office of a Greenfield site today? This is a quite a hot topic, because as much as VDI/xDI/DDI is the latest craze that&#x2019;s sweeping the IT sector, is it really all it&#x2019;s cracked up to be? What [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.techagility.info/2007/08/greenfield-design-should-you-use-terminal-servercitrix-or-vmwares-vdi/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Deciding which Thin Client is the best for your organization? Is there a new paradigm starting to play out?</title>
		<link>http://www.techagility.info/2007/07/deciding-which-thin-client-is-the-best-for-your-organization-is-there-a-new-paradigm-starting-to-play-out/</link>
		<comments>http://www.techagility.info/2007/07/deciding-which-thin-client-is-the-best-for-your-organization-is-there-a-new-paradigm-starting-to-play-out/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Jul 2007 10:35:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>dcaddick</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Citrix]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HP/Neoware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hardware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Linux]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Remote Protocols]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Thin Clients]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VDI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[XPe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[XenApp]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techagility.info/2007/07/deciding-which-thin-client-is-the-best-for-your-organization-is-there-a-new-paradigm-starting-to-play-out/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Deciding which Thin Client is good for you? So you are considering a Desktop Refresh in your organization? Are you aware of the impending &#34;Tipping Point&#34; where the difference between PC&#8217;s and Thin Clients is about to become blurred? Traditional Thinking: Traditional thinking around Thin Clients focus&#8217;s on the matrix between a choice of Hardware [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.techagility.info/2007/07/deciding-which-thin-client-is-the-best-for-your-organization-is-there-a-new-paradigm-starting-to-play-out/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
