89 views
May 12

My only disappointment is that we are currently in the middle of moving our current Solutions Centre from one Office location to the other so it’ll be some while before I get a chance to test this.

It certainly looks quite impressive and it does have some lofty aims, but from a brief look through as well as their well deserved reputation based on Flex Profiles I’m sure this will stand up to it’s promises.

Test Scenario’s
With login VSI you can compare many different scenarios:
• VDI vs. SBC
• VMware, XenServer or Hyper-V running virtual desktops or Terminal/Citrix Servers
• Virtualized XP desktops versus virtualized Vista Desktops
• Performance impact of application streaming technologies
• Impact of (different) virus scanners
• Performance impact of tuning parameters
• Different VDI platforms
• Different Storage platforms
• Impact of changes or updates like service packs or security fixes
• Hardware differences
• x64 vs. 32 bits
• Etc…

I’d be very interested in hearing from anyone who does have the facility to test?

Login Consultants develop presentation virtualization benchmarking tool

Monday, May 12, 2008   |   0 Comments   |   addthis

The consulting firm Login Consultants just opened the beta program of the first benchmarking tool for presentation virtualization: Login Virtual Session Index (VSI).

The product will measures the performance of a remote desktop session served by a Microsoft Terminal Services  / Citrix XenApp server or a VDI virtual machine.

vsi_chart

To run the tool it’s required to have a 4 tiers infrastructure: a domain controller for the authentication a file server for logging user sessions, a server to host the TS/XenApp/VDI service and a workstation to launch the user sessions.

The firm is also working to introduce support for application streaming.

Enroll for the beta here.

virtualization.info: Login Consultants develop presentation virtualization benchmarking tool

written by dcaddick

150 views
Apr 28

I am sure this is not really what VMware had in mind when they were touting VMware OnDemand? I’m guessing they had more of an idea that it would combine some of the benefits of ACE with ESX? ;-)

I have just got back from some training in Houston and while listening to a question from a colleague from the UK where he asked if "VDI was going to be able to use the full suite of Hypervisor functionality like vMotion…"  and that got me thinking…

Some of the Conventional Wisdom around the place holds that VDI by itself will likely not be able to cover all of any one customers needs and most will more than likely need to look at quite possibly a number of different approaches to cover ALL employees and ALL Applications.

So with this in mind I’d be interested in your thoughts on the following idea?

Just a few thoughts around VDI??

Let’s say that we stock a couple of decent servers with loads of resources and allows us to run quite a few VDI instances? OK? So one of the possible issues with the classic VDI so far is that if a user places a bit too much pressure on the resources then it has the potential to impact on all other users, being as it is a shared resource? (This is still one of the classic gotcha’s in Terminal Server and Citrix PS - the session is sticky and it stays with the same server unless a logout/login occurs)

So one idea I’m kicking around is the possibility that if a user started something like a 120Mb Excel spreadsheet that might consume quite a bit of CPU then would it be possible to use the vMotion to transfer him to a BladePC, if they started 3 or 4 of them (or they needed more resources?) then transfer them to a BladeWS…..?

Seamlessly!! with the user completely unaware that this has happened!!

Now the fundamentals of vMotion (or XenMotion for that matter?) requires shared boot storage - BUT I don’t think it needs to be NFS or iSCSI, etc. - the Citrix Provisioning Server or OS Streaming method like Neoware IM would probably work just as well in this scenario? As this then leaves the Virtual HardDisk/Storage in a common area accessible by the Vitrual Desktops regardless of whether they are running on VDI’s, the BladePC’s or the BladeWS’s.

The other point is the similarity of CPU would possibly cause an issue, and this probably extends beyond just Intel/AMD? This appears to be a fundamental of vMotion/XenMotion? So this might not fly today, but it is possible that with improvements in the Hypervisors this issue might be overcome at some stage soon?

Anyway, what do you think of the *idea/concept*? As a user requires more CPU and resources they might be able to be transferred from shared resources (VDI on ESX) to individual resources (BladePC) and then high powered resources (BladeWS) - once the high intensity workload has finished then the user would be transferred seamlessly back through the stack to a VDI instance on the ESX server.

Please bear in mind that this is only a concept at the moment and there are clearly problems and issues to be overcome - but the main reason for this post is to ask if you think it has legs? What do you think?

Clearly the ESX/Hypervisor would need to be able to run on hardware outside of it’s current Hardware Compatibility List (HCL) but with Xen this might not be such an issue?

Is wonder if this is where XenDesktop is headed? ;-)

written by dcaddick

197 views
Apr 17

So this turned up in my email this morning courtesy of Login Consultants and I must admit that I am intrigued as to what it’s full capabilities will be, but judging by their previous efforts with tools like Flex Profiles I’m sure it will be a very useful tool indeed.

May 7: 1st Beta Release Free “Login Virtual Session Indexer”

May 7th Login Consultants will release the first beta of Login Virtual Session Indexer (Login VSI), a free and easy to use benchmarking methodology from Login Consultants. The Login VSI is a complete toolset that allows you easily to compare scalability of all virtualization platforms and technologies. Login VSI supports all recent Windows OS’s (including 32 and 64bit), Office 2003 and 2007, all application streaming technologies and most importantly both SBC and VDI.

Because the setup is so simple there is an infinite amount of combinations and technologies you can now compare. For instance, you can also measure the relative impact of a virussanner or performance optimization technologies. Additionally, Login VSI will be a perfect tool to compare scalability of different virtualization platforms. Enter May 7th in your agenda, and watch our website www.loginconsultants.com.

written by dcaddick

139 views
Apr 13

Well tell us something we don’t know? ;-)

Seriously, I have recently started using a new HP 2710p laptop and I’m shocked to find that my normal RAM load is something around 1 - 1.1Gb just doing routine tasks…  how crazy is that? When I get time I do want to rebuild it with the XP image because this is a joke - and the supposedly fancy UI is not that good really.

What I did find interesting in this missive from Gartner is the comments at the bottom that are suggestions to Microsoft?

Their advice to Microsoft took several forms, but one road they urged the software giant to take was virtualization. "We envision a very modular and virtualized world," said the researchers, who spelled out a future where virtualization — specifically a hypervisor — is standard on client as well as server versions of Windows.

"An OS, in this case Windows, will ride atop the hypervisor, but it will be much thinner, smaller and modular than it is today. Even the Win32 API set should be a module that can be deployed to maintain support for traditional Windows applications on some devices, but other[s] may not have that module installed."

The reason I find this so intriguing is that this almost follows what Ron Oglesby was suggesting way back in 2006?
Where is all this virtualization going?

Windows is ‘collapsing,’ Gartner analysts warn

The researchers damn Windows in current form, urge radical changes

By Gregg Keizer

April 10, 2008 (Computerworld) Calling the situation "untenable" and describing Windows as "collapsing," a pair of Gartner analysts yesterday said Microsoft Corp. must make radical changes to its operating system or risk becoming a has-been.

In a presentation at a Gartner-sponsored conference in Las Vegas, analysts Michael Silver and Neil MacDonald said Microsoft has not responded to the market, is overburdened by nearly two decades of legacy code and decisions, and faces serious competition on a whole host of fronts that will make Windows moot unless the software developer acts.

"For Microsoft, its ecosystem and its customers, the situation is untenable," said Silver and MacDonald in their prepared presentation, titled "Windows Is Collapsing: How What Comes Next Will Improve."

Among Microsoft’s problems, the pair said, is Windows’ rapidly-expanding code base, which makes it virtually impossible to quickly craft a new version with meaningful changes. That was proved by Vista, they said, when Microsoft — frustrated by lack of progress during the five-year development effort on the new operating — hit the "reset" button and dropped back to the more stable code of Windows Server 2003 as the foundation of Vista.

"This is a large part of the reason [why] Windows Vista delivered primarily incremental improvements," they said. In turn, that became one of the reasons why businesses pushed back Vista deployment plans. "Most users do not understand the benefits of Windows Vista or do not see Vista as being better enough than Windows XP to make incurring the cost and pain of migration worthwhile."

Other analysts, including those at Gartner rival Forrester Research Inc., have highlighted the slow move toward Vista. Last month, Forrester said that by the end of 2007 only 6.3% of 50,000 enterprise computer users it surveyed were working with Vista. What gains Vista made during its first year, added Forrester, appeared to be at the expense of Windows 2000; Windows XP’s share hardly budged.

The monolithic nature of Windows — although Microsoft talks about Vista’s modularity, Silver and MacDonald said it doesn’t go nearly far enough — not only makes it tough to deliver a worthwhile upgrade, but threatens Microsoft in the mid- and long-term.

Users want a smaller Windows that can run on low-priced — and low-powered — hardware. And increasingly, users work with "OS-agnostic applications," the two analysts said in their presentation. It takes too long for Microsoft to build the next version, the company is being beaten by others in the innovation arena, and in the future — perhaps as soon as the next three years — it’s going to have trouble competing with Web applications and small, specialized devices.

"Apple introduced its iPhone running OS X, but Microsoft requires a different product on handhelds because Windows Vista is too large, which makes application development, support and the user experience all more difficult," according to Silver and MacDonald.

"Windows as we know it must be replaced," they said in their presentation.

Their advice to Microsoft took several forms, but one road they urged the software giant to take was virtualization. "We envision a very modular and virtualized world," said the researchers, who spelled out a future where virtualization — specifically a hypervisor — is standard on client as well as server versions of Windows.

"An OS, in this case Windows, will ride atop the hypervisor, but it will be much thinner, smaller and modular than it is today. Even the Win32 API set should be a module that can be deployed to maintain support for traditional Windows applications on some devices, but other[s] may not have that module installed."

Windows is ‘collapsing,’ Gartner analysts warn

written by dcaddick

143 views
Apr 13

So news is in courtesy of Alessandro that it looks like it’s quite possible that folks will no longer be able to run ESX as a guest OS inside VMware Workstation. We all know it’s not a good idea - but sometimes it’s the easiest way of being able to demonstrate or troubleshoot issues when you don’t have handy access to an ESX Server.

VMware Workstation 6.5 doesn’t allow ESX as guest anymore

Friday, April 11, 2008   |   0 Comments   |   addthis

No matter how much VMware is extending its HCL, a large number of users is still looking for ways to install the company flagship hypervisor ESX (formerly ESX Server) inside Workstation virtual machines.

Being one of the most wanted feature ever, hacks to achieve the goal proliferated, and our post about how to run ESX Server 3 inside a Workstation 6 virtual machine is one of the most article ever read.

Said do the community disappointment in discovering that the new Workstation 6.5 beta 1 prevents the hack mentioned above doesn’t come by surprise.

One of the VMware employees that addressed the complains anyway is mentioning (but not promising) the possibility to run again ESX inside a VM since the Workstation 6.5 feature list is not finalized yet.

virtualization.info: VMware Workstation 6.5 doesn’t allow ESX as guest anymore

written by dcaddick

196 views
Mar 17

Talk about the cat among the pigeons? I was certainly aware that MS’s 2008 was to have Hyper-V included at a minimal cost of USD$28 but that is not due for another 5 months or so, and it was always expected that the pricepoint would come down to meet MS but this is quite early I would have thought?

As Alessandro points out - this will cause some serious pain in the Sales Channel, this is where Citrix had a big jump on VMware and as far as I am aware VMware was getting very serious about trying to ramp this up ASAP - but it would now appear that one of those benefits or sales models that was being offered to the partners will now be disappearing?

So I wonder what this will do to Citrix’s Xen pricing, I can only imagine that they are going to join VMware and MS and will want to be in there competing on price as well?

So the best guess at the moment is that most of Ron Oglesby’s crystal ball gazing of a couple of years back is now coming to fruition and the Hypervisor is already a commodity - so let’s move on to management of the Virtual World? ;-)

Dell to give VMware ESX Server 3i for free?

Saturday, March 15, 2008   |   4 Comments

Not only Dell is going to sell virtualization-ready solutions (hardware + VMware ESX Server 3i) in one click, but it seems that the OEM vendor is going to give ESX Server 3i for free.

As last article of the week The Inquirer reports the words of Martin Niemer, Senior Product Marketing Manager at VMware, which says that Dell will not charge anything for the hypervisor.

If confirmed this decision will have a serious impact on the sales channel.

On one side other OEMs that have a distribution agreement with VMware (HP, IBM, Fujitsu and other) will be almost obliged to do the same to not give Dell any competitive advantage.

On the other side the VMware distributors and resellers will see their chances to sell ESX Server in the SMB market fall down near to zero.

virtualization.info: Dell to give VMware ESX Server 3i for free?

written by dcaddick

315 views
Feb 09

In some cases the regular methods of "Going to Market" with a new product is fraught with pitfalls as it is conceived by Marketing and/or Product managers who then seem to loose sight of what the Customer is actually after - I’ve always thought it better to get the product and solution in front of the customer as quickly as possible and let them make up their mind and give feedback?

In all fairness, with some of the larger Vendor’s there is so much red tape and bureaucracy this makes it nigh on impossible to actually create demo sites like this that Gareth has created - so kudos to him for getting this created.

What Gareth has alluded to but possibly failed to qualify was, if you don’t have a Citrix ICA client installed then you might also want to think about downloading that elsewhere than from his hosted servers as that will also be quite quicker at over 17Mb for the web client?

Xendesktop or VDM2? Compare them for yourself

When the beta code for VDM2 was first released I wanted to push them both out over the Internet, however there was a red tape / NDA issue.

Now that VDM2 is released I can put both of them out together. All of the components are running as virtual machines on one ESX host. The XP clients are identical in terms of their configuration and resources.

The two URLs are https://oasxendesktop.oas.co.za for the Citrix XenDesktop and https://VDM2.oas.co.za for the VMware VDM2.

username is demo
password is also demo.

The latency is likely to be pretty awful for those abroad. It is slow but usable in South Africa but I am interested in seeing how the performance is from Europe, I think our under-sea cable terminates in Europe so it will probably be even worse in North America.

We have unfortunately also been having to contend with an inordinate number of power cuts, so please bear with our Third World infrastructure. Crises notwithstanding, I will try to give you some more details on the configuration some comparisons on the two different mechanisms tomorrow.

Stop Press:
Whoa, the reason that the Xendesktop demo worked was that most people already had a Citrix client. The VMware VDI agent is 6MB in size and getting that over our slow link will be hopeless.
Try to download and install it from http://garethcharlotte.googlepages.com/VMware-vdmclient-2.0.0-403.exe , this is hosted by google and should come down fairly quickly worldwide.

VMware and CITRIX for South Africa

written by dcaddick

316 views
Feb 09

So as I’m going to be attempting this in the next few weeks it is interesting to note that this would appear to still be an issue with the RTM of 2008 as the Hyper-V is still in beta.

Another note mentioned that you don’t actually reinstall:

You don’t really need to reinstall anything. You only have to reset System & Default User regional settings to original (default EN-US) settings and then reboot the server.
Ciao,
Alessandro

Still, worth keeping mind if you are after the Hyper-V service? ;-)

Please refer to Ben Armstrong’s post here:

http://blogs.msdn.com/virtual_pc_guy/archive/2007/12/13/hyper-v-beta-now-available-for-download.aspx

  1. You need to install using ‘English (United States)’.  If you install with any other language (or flavor of English) Hyper-V will not work.  However - you can change the local / keyboard preferences for your user after installation without any problems.

Hyper-V on Win2008 RTM - VMM service fails to start?

written by dcaddick

415 views
Jan 16

So this certainly adds some ammunition for VMware’s coming stoush with Microsoft in the Battle of the Hypervisors?

It makes you wonder who’s next on VMware’s radar?

VMware acquires Thinstall

Just yesterday virtualization.info published the news about a possible acqusition of VMware in the application virtualization market, speculating that the acquired firm could be FastScale.

The official announcement comes today, clarifing the actual acquired company and the company strategy behind the move:

VMware, Inc. , the virtualization software leader, today announced it has entered into a definitive agreement to acquire Thinstall, a privately-held application virtualization software company headquartered in San Francisco. VMware is acquiring Thinstall to expand its desktop virtualization capabilities which help customers better provision, deploy and update desktop environments. The terms of the acquisition, which is expected to be completed in the current fiscal quarter, subject to customary closing conditions, were not disclosed…

The acquisition of Thinstall and its use for VDI scenarios extended the competition front with Microsoft (which acquired Softricity application vendor in June 2006) and Citrix, and brings the company a notable set of OEM partnerships: with LANDesk (March 2007), with Provision Networks (July 2007), with BMC (September 2007) and with Macrovision (October 2007).

Given the strong focus of Thinstall on Microsoft platforms, the acquisition seems to validate an important point, often emerging in surveys: large majority of virtual machines contain Windows guest OSes.

At the same time this acquition validates once and forever the fact that application virtualization is considered one the next mainstream technology for most major players: before VMware, Microsoft acquired Softricity, Citrix acquired Ardence, Symantec acquired Altiris and even Google acquired GreenBorder.

Thinstall is the 7th acquisition for VMware. Before it the virtualization player acquired Akimbi (June 2006), Propero (April 2007), Determina (August 2007), Dunes Technologies (September 2007), Sciant (October 2007) and Foedus (January 2008).

If the trend continues VMware will acquire a new company per month.

virtualization.info: VMware acquires Thinstall

written by dcaddick

788 views
Dec 17

I found this article today at CIO via an Article at Doug Browns site www.dabcc.com and thought it too good to just post the quote. This is exactly why Virtualization is shaking up the IT market so much - it has the capacity to drastically change the way you think about "Flexibility" and "Agility".

Being able to provision on the fly in 30 minutes or so doesn’t hurt either - and it’s this very reason that makes concepts like VDI seem so very attractive.

Virtualization at Warp Speed: How One Company Made it Fly

Want to virtualize 95 percent of your production servers within a year? Vincent Biddlecombe did. Here’s how the CTO of logistics company Transplace went from having no virtualization expertise in house to running the company’s mission-critical app on a VM.

By Laurianne McLaughlin

December 12, 2007 — CIO — Many CIO’s wonder how far and how fast they can run with virtualization right now. Once you get an initial taste of the cost savings, flexibility, and speed of provisioning that server virtualization enables, you want to make a fast break for a larger victory. Vincent Biddlecombe, CTO of Transplace, doesn’t wonder anymore: He just completed an instructive sprint.

Since mid-2007, Biddlecombe has virtualized almost all the production servers at Transplace, a third-party transportation logistics provider. (The company helps customers such as retail chain stores maximize efficiency in their supply chain and shipping activities.) And he’s been running his company’s most critical application—a home-grown transportation system—on a VMware ESX environment for a month now, with no major hiccups.

By the way, Biddlecombe didn’t have any virtualization or VMware expertise in house among his 100 IT staffers when he started this project: "We were a Sun group," he says. To address this issue, he hired a consulting partner, Catapult Systems, to bring VMware knowledge to his group.

Timing is Everything

For Transplace, the 2007 sprint toward virtualization made sense on both a business level and a technology level, Biddlecombe says. The business desire: Transplace works with its customers via Software-as-a-Service (SaaS), so the company needs the best scalability, availability and manageability they can get for hosting customer data. Virtualization appealed for both disaster recovery and scalability reasons, Biddlecombe says. "We can simply add capability as we need it."

On the technology side, Transplace’s internal systems were due for a facelift. In early 2007, Transplace decided to move its production data center from the corporate office in Plano, Texas, to an offsite co-location facility in nearby Dallas. (Transplace also has a test/development and disaster recovery facility in Lowell, Ark.) At about this time, the company was due to upgrade its server hardware, Biddlecombe says, so it made sense to roll out the virtualization effort with that server upgrade.

For Transplace’s database applications, he switched from Sun servers (running Solaris) to IBM mid-range servers (p570 servers using the Power6 processor and running AIX). For Transplace’s middle-tier servers, he switched from Sun servers to Dell PowerEdge 2950 servers, using VMware’s ESX Server software for virtualization. (For storage, Transplace chose Network Appliance’s FAS 3070 storage systems.)

"We wanted to provide an environment where we could have maximum availability between our production and disaster recovery data centers," Biddlecombe says. "By using a combination of VMware with the storage, we’ve effectively copied our servers out to the disaster recovery center."

Today, Transplace’s production environment is almost completely virtualized, and Biddlecombe estimates it will be 95 percent virtualized by year’s end. That’s quite an achievement, says Burton Group research analyst Chris Wolf. "From my experience, organizations that are able to virtualize 40 percent of their servers in a year are doing really well," Wolf says.

In total, Biddlecombe’s IT group now runs about 110 VMs. In fact, the only significant applications that he’s not running on a VM right now are his Microsoft Exchange servers and SQL server databases—both known for being extremely I/O intensive. (They hog resources on physical servers to the point that it doesn’t make sense to virtualize them in many cases).

The Mission-Critical App Goes Virtual

The thought of running mission-critical ERP applications on a virtual machine makes many CIO’s nervous—too nervous to try it (even now that ERP giant SAP has announced support for its products running on VMware.) But not Biddlecombe. As for Transplace’s mission-critical app, a transportation management system, the first month of its virtualized run, coming to a close now, has proven pretty uneventful, Biddlecombe says. He saw no major pitfalls or performance issues.

This transportation management system determines, for instance, which orders need to be shipped together for consolidation purposes, how the order should be best shipped (parcel, full truckload or other options), which shipping carrier is optimal, and so on. This system also handles freight audit and payment. Effectively serving as Transplace’s ERP system, the transportation system handles 4 million shipments per year, or about $2.75 billion in transportation spending annually. Developed in-house using Java, it runs on BEA WebLogic application servers and Oracle for database work.

Biddlecombe has dedicated 50 VMs to support the components of the transportation system running on WebLogic, and 50 to 60 VMs for some other components and everything else.

To determine the right number of VMs and balance workloads on the servers running those crucial VMs, the IT team did extensive prototyping. But they had an advantage that not all companies have with their ERP systems: Since the transportation system software was developed in-house, Biddlecombe’s team knew a lot of its performance quirks already. "We’re intimately familiar with what our software needs," says Biddlecombe, who has been with Transplace for three years and served as CTO for fifteen months.

Interestingly, Biddlecombe has not found it necessary yet to invest in any new third-party management tools from any of the virtualization upstarts, though he is scoping out one emerging need. Favoring a layered monitoring approach, he currently uses HP’s Business Availability Center tools at the top level, HP’s SiteScope at the next level (measuring factors like memory utilization in every app in every VM) and then network and database monitoring tools. He’s also using VMware’s vMotion tool to move VMs around as needed.

"The one area we haven’t addressed is, are all the VMs sized properly," Biddlecombe says. "I think we’ve given some VMs more memory than they need. Our emphasis to date has been application performance. The last layer will be reducing VM resources so they have just enough," he says. The IT team can get some of the memory data from the SiteScope tool, but they have to do one VM at a time, he notes. This is the need that’s making him consider finding another management tool.

For securing the virtual environment, Transplace’s IT team applies the same security tools (McAfee antivirus and others) and practices that they would with a physical server, Biddlecombe says.

Provisioning in 30 Minutes or Less

As for metrics to prove his success, Biddlecombe says he wasn’t able to do many before and after comparisons because so many factors changed at once: a new data center location, new hardware and all those new VMs all got wrapped up into the same effort. What he can measure however, is how quickly he can provision a new server or new computing power to the business side. It used to take him a week to provision a server: Now it takes 30 minutes.

"We have gained a dramatically increased capacity to provision new servers, and more scalability," he says.

The ability to scale to add VMs right away helps Transplace deal with any spikes in data throughput from its customers: "Because we’re SaaS, our customers benefited immediately," he says.

And when IT wants to create a test and development VM, or a business executive needs a new customer demonstration environment, IT can do it within the half hour, he notes.

In another benefit of the highly-virtualized environment, the servers at the disaster recovery site can serve double duty, Biddlecombe says. They can be test VMs one moment, and disaster recovery the next. "We don’t have to have 100 servers just standing there waiting for disaster," he says.

What’s next on Biddlecombe’s to-do list with regards to virtualization? He’ll continue to ensure that the backup strategy is solid, he says. "There’s this concept that I’m putting a lot of eggs in one basket," he says. "We use VMware Consolidated Backup, but you also have to make sure all your OS patches are applied, backups done properly. You want to make sure you’re doing the blocking and tackling."

Other stories by Laurianne McLaughlin

© 2007 CXO Media Inc.

Virtualization at Warp Speed: How One Company Made it Fly - CIO.com - Business Technology Leadership

written by dcaddick