89 views
May 12

My only disappointment is that we are currently in the middle of moving our current Solutions Centre from one Office location to the other so it’ll be some while before I get a chance to test this.

It certainly looks quite impressive and it does have some lofty aims, but from a brief look through as well as their well deserved reputation based on Flex Profiles I’m sure this will stand up to it’s promises.

Test Scenario’s
With login VSI you can compare many different scenarios:
• VDI vs. SBC
• VMware, XenServer or Hyper-V running virtual desktops or Terminal/Citrix Servers
• Virtualized XP desktops versus virtualized Vista Desktops
• Performance impact of application streaming technologies
• Impact of (different) virus scanners
• Performance impact of tuning parameters
• Different VDI platforms
• Different Storage platforms
• Impact of changes or updates like service packs or security fixes
• Hardware differences
• x64 vs. 32 bits
• Etc…

I’d be very interested in hearing from anyone who does have the facility to test?

Login Consultants develop presentation virtualization benchmarking tool

Monday, May 12, 2008   |   0 Comments   |   addthis

The consulting firm Login Consultants just opened the beta program of the first benchmarking tool for presentation virtualization: Login Virtual Session Index (VSI).

The product will measures the performance of a remote desktop session served by a Microsoft Terminal Services  / Citrix XenApp server or a VDI virtual machine.

vsi_chart

To run the tool it’s required to have a 4 tiers infrastructure: a domain controller for the authentication a file server for logging user sessions, a server to host the TS/XenApp/VDI service and a workstation to launch the user sessions.

The firm is also working to introduce support for application streaming.

Enroll for the beta here.

virtualization.info: Login Consultants develop presentation virtualization benchmarking tool

written by dcaddick

150 views
Apr 28

I am sure this is not really what VMware had in mind when they were touting VMware OnDemand? I’m guessing they had more of an idea that it would combine some of the benefits of ACE with ESX? ;-)

I have just got back from some training in Houston and while listening to a question from a colleague from the UK where he asked if "VDI was going to be able to use the full suite of Hypervisor functionality like vMotion…"  and that got me thinking…

Some of the Conventional Wisdom around the place holds that VDI by itself will likely not be able to cover all of any one customers needs and most will more than likely need to look at quite possibly a number of different approaches to cover ALL employees and ALL Applications.

So with this in mind I’d be interested in your thoughts on the following idea?

Just a few thoughts around VDI??

Let’s say that we stock a couple of decent servers with loads of resources and allows us to run quite a few VDI instances? OK? So one of the possible issues with the classic VDI so far is that if a user places a bit too much pressure on the resources then it has the potential to impact on all other users, being as it is a shared resource? (This is still one of the classic gotcha’s in Terminal Server and Citrix PS - the session is sticky and it stays with the same server unless a logout/login occurs)

So one idea I’m kicking around is the possibility that if a user started something like a 120Mb Excel spreadsheet that might consume quite a bit of CPU then would it be possible to use the vMotion to transfer him to a BladePC, if they started 3 or 4 of them (or they needed more resources?) then transfer them to a BladeWS…..?

Seamlessly!! with the user completely unaware that this has happened!!

Now the fundamentals of vMotion (or XenMotion for that matter?) requires shared boot storage - BUT I don’t think it needs to be NFS or iSCSI, etc. - the Citrix Provisioning Server or OS Streaming method like Neoware IM would probably work just as well in this scenario? As this then leaves the Virtual HardDisk/Storage in a common area accessible by the Vitrual Desktops regardless of whether they are running on VDI’s, the BladePC’s or the BladeWS’s.

The other point is the similarity of CPU would possibly cause an issue, and this probably extends beyond just Intel/AMD? This appears to be a fundamental of vMotion/XenMotion? So this might not fly today, but it is possible that with improvements in the Hypervisors this issue might be overcome at some stage soon?

Anyway, what do you think of the *idea/concept*? As a user requires more CPU and resources they might be able to be transferred from shared resources (VDI on ESX) to individual resources (BladePC) and then high powered resources (BladeWS) - once the high intensity workload has finished then the user would be transferred seamlessly back through the stack to a VDI instance on the ESX server.

Please bear in mind that this is only a concept at the moment and there are clearly problems and issues to be overcome - but the main reason for this post is to ask if you think it has legs? What do you think?

Clearly the ESX/Hypervisor would need to be able to run on hardware outside of it’s current Hardware Compatibility List (HCL) but with Xen this might not be such an issue?

Is wonder if this is where XenDesktop is headed? ;-)

written by dcaddick

197 views
Apr 17

So this turned up in my email this morning courtesy of Login Consultants and I must admit that I am intrigued as to what it’s full capabilities will be, but judging by their previous efforts with tools like Flex Profiles I’m sure it will be a very useful tool indeed.

May 7: 1st Beta Release Free “Login Virtual Session Indexer”

May 7th Login Consultants will release the first beta of Login Virtual Session Indexer (Login VSI), a free and easy to use benchmarking methodology from Login Consultants. The Login VSI is a complete toolset that allows you easily to compare scalability of all virtualization platforms and technologies. Login VSI supports all recent Windows OS’s (including 32 and 64bit), Office 2003 and 2007, all application streaming technologies and most importantly both SBC and VDI.

Because the setup is so simple there is an infinite amount of combinations and technologies you can now compare. For instance, you can also measure the relative impact of a virussanner or performance optimization technologies. Additionally, Login VSI will be a perfect tool to compare scalability of different virtualization platforms. Enter May 7th in your agenda, and watch our website www.loginconsultants.com.

written by dcaddick

139 views
Apr 13

Well tell us something we don’t know? ;-)

Seriously, I have recently started using a new HP 2710p laptop and I’m shocked to find that my normal RAM load is something around 1 - 1.1Gb just doing routine tasks…  how crazy is that? When I get time I do want to rebuild it with the XP image because this is a joke - and the supposedly fancy UI is not that good really.

What I did find interesting in this missive from Gartner is the comments at the bottom that are suggestions to Microsoft?

Their advice to Microsoft took several forms, but one road they urged the software giant to take was virtualization. "We envision a very modular and virtualized world," said the researchers, who spelled out a future where virtualization — specifically a hypervisor — is standard on client as well as server versions of Windows.

"An OS, in this case Windows, will ride atop the hypervisor, but it will be much thinner, smaller and modular than it is today. Even the Win32 API set should be a module that can be deployed to maintain support for traditional Windows applications on some devices, but other[s] may not have that module installed."

The reason I find this so intriguing is that this almost follows what Ron Oglesby was suggesting way back in 2006?
Where is all this virtualization going?

Windows is ‘collapsing,’ Gartner analysts warn

The researchers damn Windows in current form, urge radical changes

By Gregg Keizer

April 10, 2008 (Computerworld) Calling the situation "untenable" and describing Windows as "collapsing," a pair of Gartner analysts yesterday said Microsoft Corp. must make radical changes to its operating system or risk becoming a has-been.

In a presentation at a Gartner-sponsored conference in Las Vegas, analysts Michael Silver and Neil MacDonald said Microsoft has not responded to the market, is overburdened by nearly two decades of legacy code and decisions, and faces serious competition on a whole host of fronts that will make Windows moot unless the software developer acts.

"For Microsoft, its ecosystem and its customers, the situation is untenable," said Silver and MacDonald in their prepared presentation, titled "Windows Is Collapsing: How What Comes Next Will Improve."

Among Microsoft’s problems, the pair said, is Windows’ rapidly-expanding code base, which makes it virtually impossible to quickly craft a new version with meaningful changes. That was proved by Vista, they said, when Microsoft — frustrated by lack of progress during the five-year development effort on the new operating — hit the "reset" button and dropped back to the more stable code of Windows Server 2003 as the foundation of Vista.

"This is a large part of the reason [why] Windows Vista delivered primarily incremental improvements," they said. In turn, that became one of the reasons why businesses pushed back Vista deployment plans. "Most users do not understand the benefits of Windows Vista or do not see Vista as being better enough than Windows XP to make incurring the cost and pain of migration worthwhile."

Other analysts, including those at Gartner rival Forrester Research Inc., have highlighted the slow move toward Vista. Last month, Forrester said that by the end of 2007 only 6.3% of 50,000 enterprise computer users it surveyed were working with Vista. What gains Vista made during its first year, added Forrester, appeared to be at the expense of Windows 2000; Windows XP’s share hardly budged.

The monolithic nature of Windows — although Microsoft talks about Vista’s modularity, Silver and MacDonald said it doesn’t go nearly far enough — not only makes it tough to deliver a worthwhile upgrade, but threatens Microsoft in the mid- and long-term.

Users want a smaller Windows that can run on low-priced — and low-powered — hardware. And increasingly, users work with "OS-agnostic applications," the two analysts said in their presentation. It takes too long for Microsoft to build the next version, the company is being beaten by others in the innovation arena, and in the future — perhaps as soon as the next three years — it’s going to have trouble competing with Web applications and small, specialized devices.

"Apple introduced its iPhone running OS X, but Microsoft requires a different product on handhelds because Windows Vista is too large, which makes application development, support and the user experience all more difficult," according to Silver and MacDonald.

"Windows as we know it must be replaced," they said in their presentation.

Their advice to Microsoft took several forms, but one road they urged the software giant to take was virtualization. "We envision a very modular and virtualized world," said the researchers, who spelled out a future where virtualization — specifically a hypervisor — is standard on client as well as server versions of Windows.

"An OS, in this case Windows, will ride atop the hypervisor, but it will be much thinner, smaller and modular than it is today. Even the Win32 API set should be a module that can be deployed to maintain support for traditional Windows applications on some devices, but other[s] may not have that module installed."

Windows is ‘collapsing,’ Gartner analysts warn

written by dcaddick

117 views
Apr 07

DISCLAIMER: If you decide to flash ANY device with something other than the Vendors correct firmware then you are on your own!!!

Moving on from a previous post the other day regarding "Supercharge Your Wireless Router With Open Firmware - Wired How-To Wiki" I was chatting to my brother and it turns out that he has recently been having troubles with his Billion device and as a consequence of it being out of warranty he decided to buy an ASUS WL-500G

And now I can see why, not only is it a Wireless Access Point with ADSL but it also has 2 x USB 2.0 ports as well so that this can effectively act as a mini NAS unit as well by hosting additional storage <see table below>

Model

Ver.

Platform & Hz

Flash

RAM

Wireless NIC

Switch

USB

Status


WL-500g Deluxe

 

Broadcom 5365 @ 200MHz

4MB

32MB

Broadcom (integrated)

in CPU

2x v2.0

Supported


WL-500g Premium

1

Broadcom 4704 @ 266MHz

8MB

32MB

Broadcom 4318 (mini-PCI)

BCM5325

2x v2.0

Supported


WL-500g Premium

2

Broadcom 5354 @ 240MHz

8MB

32MB

Broadcom (integrated)

?

2x v2.0 (SMC USB2520)

WiP


WL-500W

 

Broadcom 4704 @ 266MHz

8MB

32MB

Broadcom 4321 (mini-PCI)

BCM5325

2x v2.0

WiP/Kamikaze

 

But the real neat part is that with his help I was also able to discover that there is a complete OpenSource effort at OpenWrt

About OpenWrt

OpenWrt is an extensible Linux distribution that runs on Linksys WRT54G/GS routers, as well as some related hardware. Unlike many other distributions for these routers, OpenWrt is built from the ground up to be a full-featured, easily modifiable operating system for your router. In practice, this means that you can have all the features you need with none of the bloat, powered by a Linux kernel that’s more recent than most other distributions.

This is where I obtained the information in the table above (link - TableofHardware) - at the very least if you are considering purchasing some form of Wireless Access Point then you should really glance through this table and satisfy yourself that have made the right choice on Hardware?

So back to OpenWrt, is it for you? well it is based on Linux so it is somewhat command line driven etc. and it’s more than likely that as much as this might provide a benefit to some, they will be put off by the install method and the possibility of bricking their device?

So if that is the case then simply move on to: X-Wrt, "OpenWrt for end users"

About Us:

X-Wrt was started because there was a need for end user extensions to OpenWrt, such as an enhanced web management console (webif). For a long time now it has been established that OpenWrt is the best firmware in its class. It far exceeds other firmwares in performance, stability, extensibility, robustness, and design. We at X-Wrt decided it was long past time for end users to get access to this superior firmware.

We are a separate project from OpenWrt due to the difference in focus and development ideals. We are considerably more pragmatic than OpenWrt and have the goal of providing solutions today, while OpenWrt has a more idealistic development philosophy and intends to perfect the firmware core, no matter how many rewrites and how much time it takes. This difference in development attitude creates a complimentary atmosphere that benefits everyone.

So how easy is this to install? Follow the screen shots from here at Installation

Image:2080Info.png

Image:OpenWrtLAN.png

written by dcaddick

788 views
Dec 17

I found this article today at CIO via an Article at Doug Browns site www.dabcc.com and thought it too good to just post the quote. This is exactly why Virtualization is shaking up the IT market so much - it has the capacity to drastically change the way you think about "Flexibility" and "Agility".

Being able to provision on the fly in 30 minutes or so doesn’t hurt either - and it’s this very reason that makes concepts like VDI seem so very attractive.

Virtualization at Warp Speed: How One Company Made it Fly

Want to virtualize 95 percent of your production servers within a year? Vincent Biddlecombe did. Here’s how the CTO of logistics company Transplace went from having no virtualization expertise in house to running the company’s mission-critical app on a VM.

By Laurianne McLaughlin

December 12, 2007 — CIO — Many CIO’s wonder how far and how fast they can run with virtualization right now. Once you get an initial taste of the cost savings, flexibility, and speed of provisioning that server virtualization enables, you want to make a fast break for a larger victory. Vincent Biddlecombe, CTO of Transplace, doesn’t wonder anymore: He just completed an instructive sprint.

Since mid-2007, Biddlecombe has virtualized almost all the production servers at Transplace, a third-party transportation logistics provider. (The company helps customers such as retail chain stores maximize efficiency in their supply chain and shipping activities.) And he’s been running his company’s most critical application—a home-grown transportation system—on a VMware ESX environment for a month now, with no major hiccups.

By the way, Biddlecombe didn’t have any virtualization or VMware expertise in house among his 100 IT staffers when he started this project: "We were a Sun group," he says. To address this issue, he hired a consulting partner, Catapult Systems, to bring VMware knowledge to his group.

Timing is Everything

For Transplace, the 2007 sprint toward virtualization made sense on both a business level and a technology level, Biddlecombe says. The business desire: Transplace works with its customers via Software-as-a-Service (SaaS), so the company needs the best scalability, availability and manageability they can get for hosting customer data. Virtualization appealed for both disaster recovery and scalability reasons, Biddlecombe says. "We can simply add capability as we need it."

On the technology side, Transplace’s internal systems were due for a facelift. In early 2007, Transplace decided to move its production data center from the corporate office in Plano, Texas, to an offsite co-location facility in nearby Dallas. (Transplace also has a test/development and disaster recovery facility in Lowell, Ark.) At about this time, the company was due to upgrade its server hardware, Biddlecombe says, so it made sense to roll out the virtualization effort with that server upgrade.

For Transplace’s database applications, he switched from Sun servers (running Solaris) to IBM mid-range servers (p570 servers using the Power6 processor and running AIX). For Transplace’s middle-tier servers, he switched from Sun servers to Dell PowerEdge 2950 servers, using VMware’s ESX Server software for virtualization. (For storage, Transplace chose Network Appliance’s FAS 3070 storage systems.)

"We wanted to provide an environment where we could have maximum availability between our production and disaster recovery data centers," Biddlecombe says. "By using a combination of VMware with the storage, we’ve effectively copied our servers out to the disaster recovery center."

Today, Transplace’s production environment is almost completely virtualized, and Biddlecombe estimates it will be 95 percent virtualized by year’s end. That’s quite an achievement, says Burton Group research analyst Chris Wolf. "From my experience, organizations that are able to virtualize 40 percent of their servers in a year are doing really well," Wolf says.

In total, Biddlecombe’s IT group now runs about 110 VMs. In fact, the only significant applications that he’s not running on a VM right now are his Microsoft Exchange servers and SQL server databases—both known for being extremely I/O intensive. (They hog resources on physical servers to the point that it doesn’t make sense to virtualize them in many cases).

The Mission-Critical App Goes Virtual

The thought of running mission-critical ERP applications on a virtual machine makes many CIO’s nervous—too nervous to try it (even now that ERP giant SAP has announced support for its products running on VMware.) But not Biddlecombe. As for Transplace’s mission-critical app, a transportation management system, the first month of its virtualized run, coming to a close now, has proven pretty uneventful, Biddlecombe says. He saw no major pitfalls or performance issues.

This transportation management system determines, for instance, which orders need to be shipped together for consolidation purposes, how the order should be best shipped (parcel, full truckload or other options), which shipping carrier is optimal, and so on. This system also handles freight audit and payment. Effectively serving as Transplace’s ERP system, the transportation system handles 4 million shipments per year, or about $2.75 billion in transportation spending annually. Developed in-house using Java, it runs on BEA WebLogic application servers and Oracle for database work.

Biddlecombe has dedicated 50 VMs to support the components of the transportation system running on WebLogic, and 50 to 60 VMs for some other components and everything else.

To determine the right number of VMs and balance workloads on the servers running those crucial VMs, the IT team did extensive prototyping. But they had an advantage that not all companies have with their ERP systems: Since the transportation system software was developed in-house, Biddlecombe’s team knew a lot of its performance quirks already. "We’re intimately familiar with what our software needs," says Biddlecombe, who has been with Transplace for three years and served as CTO for fifteen months.

Interestingly, Biddlecombe has not found it necessary yet to invest in any new third-party management tools from any of the virtualization upstarts, though he is scoping out one emerging need. Favoring a layered monitoring approach, he currently uses HP’s Business Availability Center tools at the top level, HP’s SiteScope at the next level (measuring factors like memory utilization in every app in every VM) and then network and database monitoring tools. He’s also using VMware’s vMotion tool to move VMs around as needed.

"The one area we haven’t addressed is, are all the VMs sized properly," Biddlecombe says. "I think we’ve given some VMs more memory than they need. Our emphasis to date has been application performance. The last layer will be reducing VM resources so they have just enough," he says. The IT team can get some of the memory data from the SiteScope tool, but they have to do one VM at a time, he notes. This is the need that’s making him consider finding another management tool.

For securing the virtual environment, Transplace’s IT team applies the same security tools (McAfee antivirus and others) and practices that they would with a physical server, Biddlecombe says.

Provisioning in 30 Minutes or Less

As for metrics to prove his success, Biddlecombe says he wasn’t able to do many before and after comparisons because so many factors changed at once: a new data center location, new hardware and all those new VMs all got wrapped up into the same effort. What he can measure however, is how quickly he can provision a new server or new computing power to the business side. It used to take him a week to provision a server: Now it takes 30 minutes.

"We have gained a dramatically increased capacity to provision new servers, and more scalability," he says.

The ability to scale to add VMs right away helps Transplace deal with any spikes in data throughput from its customers: "Because we’re SaaS, our customers benefited immediately," he says.

And when IT wants to create a test and development VM, or a business executive needs a new customer demonstration environment, IT can do it within the half hour, he notes.

In another benefit of the highly-virtualized environment, the servers at the disaster recovery site can serve double duty, Biddlecombe says. They can be test VMs one moment, and disaster recovery the next. "We don’t have to have 100 servers just standing there waiting for disaster," he says.

What’s next on Biddlecombe’s to-do list with regards to virtualization? He’ll continue to ensure that the backup strategy is solid, he says. "There’s this concept that I’m putting a lot of eggs in one basket," he says. "We use VMware Consolidated Backup, but you also have to make sure all your OS patches are applied, backups done properly. You want to make sure you’re doing the blocking and tackling."

Other stories by Laurianne McLaughlin

© 2007 CXO Media Inc.

Virtualization at Warp Speed: How One Company Made it Fly - CIO.com - Business Technology Leadership

written by dcaddick

473 views
Nov 27

Well, hang on a minute and let’s not get too carried away? It doesn’t "run" 45 times faster - what is explained here is a simple file copy, a large file copy sure, but essentially the basic File and Print server stuff that Novell used to own some 10 or 15 years back?

Don’t get me wrong, I’m glad that someone at Redmond has finally found the Turbo button, and what I would be curious about is "exactly how" that copy instruction was carried out, and how they took their measurements - they haven’t indicated wether this is on a 1G or 10G LAN for instance?

I’m sure it was done in a like for like manner, however the reason I ask is that there is a world of difference if for instance the new Server 2008 has been perhaps optimised for 10G? Was this carried out on a Server 2008 "Core"? was the copy initiated from Robocopy, command line, CtrlC-CtrlV, mouse - even these actions can tend to have an impact (especially over slower WAN links)  

I have no doubt that Server 2008 will be faster, but I’ll wait to see exactly how much faster? ;-) 

Microsoft Developers: Windows Server 2008 Runs 45 Times Faster Than ‘03

It’s not unheard of for some of the earliest adopters of Microsoft’s Vista this year to compare the experience to swimming in wet cement — slow and not very pretty.

But word is filtering out of the Redmond, Wash.-based software giant that indicates its new server could be considerably better. Ward Ralston at the Windows Server Division Weblog reports that "our MSN group who is dogfooding Windows Server 200 RC0" has achieved the kind of testing results that might prompt a double-take. In a side-by-side between Windows Server 2003 and Windows Server 2008, the group set out to transfer 10.8 GB of "VirtualEarth Stitch files" from one server to another, and back again.

On Windows Server 2003, the data took five hours, 40 minutes and 30 seconds to transfer once, and more than six hours to transfer back again.

On Windows Server 2008, the same data took seven minutes and 45 seconds to transfer one way, and eight minutes and 10 seconds to transfer back. The Microsoft people spare you the task of doing all that math: "The improvement observed was ~45 times faster over windows 2003."

If the numbers are consistent and no other glitches come up (this software has been in beta for a few years now), it could prove compelling when it is launched - - an event now slated for the first quarter of next year.

Microsoft Developers: Windows Server 2008 Runs 45 Times Faster Than ‘03 - The Chart - IT Channel News And Views by CRN and VARBusiness

written by dcaddick