<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>TechAgility &#187; Security</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.techagility.info/category/security/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.techagility.info</link>
	<description>using Technology to become more Agile at work and play - and more thoughts on VDI, Thin Clients, VMware, Citrix, etc...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 28 Jul 2010 06:46:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;MIS Financial Review&#8221; taking copyright protection too far? So far that no-one can read your web pages &#8211; surely this is ridiculous?</title>
		<link>http://www.techagility.info/2009/01/mis-financial-review-taking-copyright-protection-too-far-so-far-that-no-one-can-read-your-web-pages-surely-this-is-ridiculous/</link>
		<comments>http://www.techagility.info/2009/01/mis-financial-review-taking-copyright-protection-too-far-so-far-that-no-one-can-read-your-web-pages-surely-this-is-ridiculous/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2009 03:00:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>dcaddick</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Browsers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Finance and Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Remote Protocols]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techagility.info/2009/01/mis-financial-review-taking-copyright-protection-too-far-so-far-that-no-one-can-read-your-web-pages-surely-this-is-ridiculous/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So how is this, these guys use a system that I guess effectively makes it impossible(?) to copy their text from the web page – but in doing this you can’t even read the article…… Caveat: I am now using Windows 7 Beta on my day-to-day Laptop and as such I am now running IE8, [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.techagility.info/2009/01/mis-financial-review-taking-copyright-protection-too-far-so-far-that-no-one-can-read-your-web-pages-surely-this-is-ridiculous/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Installing Altiris DS or HP&#8217;s Rapid Deployment Pack and having issues with getting PXE working &#8211; hopefully this info might help?</title>
		<link>http://www.techagility.info/2009/01/installing-altiris-ds-or-hps-rapid-deployment-pack-and-having-issues-with-getting-pxe-working-hopefully-this-info-might-help/</link>
		<comments>http://www.techagility.info/2009/01/installing-altiris-ds-or-hps-rapid-deployment-pack-and-having-issues-with-getting-pxe-working-hopefully-this-info-might-help/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Jan 2009 10:16:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>dcaddick</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blades]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HP/Neoware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hardware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Networks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Remote Protocols]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Troubleshooting]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techagility.info/2009/01/installing-altiris-ds-or-hps-rapid-deployment-pack-and-having-issues-with-getting-pxe-working-hopefully-this-info-might-help/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A colleague of mine was after some info on a tool that I had mentioned before and while I was at it I had some extra tools and links and other handy stuff that I thought I’d share? The details regarding Fixed Mode below have proven to be very useful today in getting PXE working [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.techagility.info/2009/01/installing-altiris-ds-or-hps-rapid-deployment-pack-and-having-issues-with-getting-pxe-working-hopefully-this-info-might-help/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>25 Absolutely Cool, Totally Free Utilities&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://www.techagility.info/2008/05/25-absolutely-cool-totally-free-utilities/</link>
		<comments>http://www.techagility.info/2008/05/25-absolutely-cool-totally-free-utilities/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 May 2008 12:47:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>dcaddick</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blogging]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hacking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Troubleshooting]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techagility.info/2008/05/13/25-absolutely-cool-totally-free-utilities/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Reap the rewards of the open-source community courtesy of Douglas Toombs from Windows IT Pro Magazine Find your free tools: &#34;LocatePC&#34; &#34;OCS Inventory NG&#34;&#160; &#34;PRTG&#34;&#160; &#34;SIW&#34;&#160; &#34;SyncBack&#34;&#160; &#34;TrueCrypt&#34;&#160; &#34;WinDirStat&#34;&#160; &#34;Wink&#34; &#34;BareTail&#34;&#160; &#34;Ethereal&#34;&#160; &#34;FileZilla&#34;&#160; &#34;NeWT&#34;&#160; &#34;Ngrep&#34;&#160; &#34;OpenSSH&#34;&#160; &#34;WinDump&#34;&#160; &#34;WinPcap&#34;&#160; &#34;Winfingerprint&#34; &#34;CamStudio&#34;&#160; &#34;CDBurnerXP&#34;&#160; &#34;Comodo Firewall Pro&#34;&#160; &#34;DriveImage XML&#34;&#160; &#34;GParted LiveCD&#34;&#160; &#34;JkDefrag&#34;&#160; &#34;PageDefrag&#34;&#160; &#34;TestDisk&#34; 25 Absolutely Cool, Totally [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.techagility.info/2008/05/25-absolutely-cool-totally-free-utilities/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Flash ads bearing malware plague popular sites</title>
		<link>http://www.techagility.info/2008/05/flash-ads-bearing-malware-plague-popular-sites/</link>
		<comments>http://www.techagility.info/2008/05/flash-ads-bearing-malware-plague-popular-sites/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 May 2008 01:40:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>dcaddick</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Security]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techagility.info/2008/05/12/flash-ads-bearing-malware-plague-popular-sites/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So I apologise in advance that this news was out about a month ago, but thought it worth reposting because of the security implications &#8211; there are a lot of traps for the unwary and if you are in any doubt you might want to head over to http://www.scambusters.org/ to check if it&#8217;s real or [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.techagility.info/2008/05/flash-ads-bearing-malware-plague-popular-sites/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>AntispyDeluxe is possibly being delivered as driveby infection? &#8211; Report from Symantec.com</title>
		<link>http://www.techagility.info/2008/04/antispydeluxe-is-possibly-being-delivered-as-driveby-infection-report-from-symanteccom/</link>
		<comments>http://www.techagility.info/2008/04/antispydeluxe-is-possibly-being-delivered-as-driveby-infection-report-from-symanteccom/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Apr 2008 12:30:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>dcaddick</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blogging]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techagility.info/2008/04/15/antispydeluxe-is-possibly-being-delivered-as-driveby-infection-report-from-symanteccom/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Just a word of warning&#8230;!!! The lovely missus this afternoon called out that there was &#34;some Virus Alert thingy on the computer screen&#34; and did I want to sort it out? Being as bright as she is she knew that one thing you don&#8217;t do is to run any download that you didn&#8217;t initiate yourself? [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.techagility.info/2008/04/antispydeluxe-is-possibly-being-delivered-as-driveby-infection-report-from-symanteccom/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>VMware Workstation 6.5 beta1 doesn&#8217;t allow ESX as guest anymore??</title>
		<link>http://www.techagility.info/2008/04/vmware-workstation-65-beta1-doesnt-allow-esx-as-guest-anymore/</link>
		<comments>http://www.techagility.info/2008/04/vmware-workstation-65-beta1-doesnt-allow-esx-as-guest-anymore/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Apr 2008 04:07:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>dcaddick</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blogging]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VMware]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techagility.info/2008/04/13/vmware-workstation-65-beta1-doesnt-allow-esx-as-guest-anymore/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So news is in courtesy of Alessandro that it looks like it&#8217;s quite possible that folks will no longer be able to run ESX as a guest OS inside VMware Workstation. We all know it&#8217;s not a good idea &#8211; but sometimes it&#8217;s the easiest way of being able to demonstrate or troubleshoot issues when [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.techagility.info/2008/04/vmware-workstation-65-beta1-doesnt-allow-esx-as-guest-anymore/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Is your Wireless Access Point not up to speed? Thinking about hacking it for more (or less) functionality?</title>
		<link>http://www.techagility.info/2008/04/is-your-wireless-access-point-not-up-to-speed-thinking-about-hacking-it-for-more-or-less-functionality/</link>
		<comments>http://www.techagility.info/2008/04/is-your-wireless-access-point-not-up-to-speed-thinking-about-hacking-it-for-more-or-less-functionality/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Apr 2008 12:50:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>dcaddick</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blogging]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hacking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Linux]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Performance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Troubleshooting]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techagility.info/2008/04/07/is-your-wireless-access-point-not-up-to-speed-thinking-about-hacking-it-for-more-or-less-functionality/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[DISCLAIMER: If you decide to flash ANY device with something other than the Vendors correct firmware then you are on your own!!! Moving on from a previous post the other day regarding &#34;Supercharge Your Wireless Router With Open Firmware &#8211; Wired How-To Wiki&#34; I was chatting to my brother and it turns out that he [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.techagility.info/2008/04/is-your-wireless-access-point-not-up-to-speed-thinking-about-hacking-it-for-more-or-less-functionality/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Mixed Novell and AD Authentication issues</title>
		<link>http://www.techagility.info/2008/03/mixed-novell-and-ad-authentication-issues/</link>
		<comments>http://www.techagility.info/2008/03/mixed-novell-and-ad-authentication-issues/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Mar 2008 22:48:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>dcaddick</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blogging]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Troubleshooting]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techagility.info/2008/03/27/mixed-novell-and-ad-authentication-issues/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Recently I have been looking in to some issues relating to mixed Novell and AD Authentication at customers sites and there does not seem to be too much information that is readily available so I thought it might be useful if I post some of the details and links here as a helper to others? [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.techagility.info/2008/03/mixed-novell-and-ad-authentication-issues/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Will Altiris ever be more than a subsidiary?</title>
		<link>http://www.techagility.info/2008/03/will-altiris-ever-be-more-than-a-subsidiary/</link>
		<comments>http://www.techagility.info/2008/03/will-altiris-ever-be-more-than-a-subsidiary/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Mar 2008 04:47:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>dcaddick</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[App Streaming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Blogging]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techagility.info/2008/03/22/will-altiris-ever-be-more-than-a-subsidiary/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It is something of a shame that Symantec is not making the best of this acquisition, especially when you consider the amount of change and hype in the Virtualization space over the last 14 months since Symantec announced the purchase? I made the comment only a few weeks ago (Thinstall quick out of the blocks) [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.techagility.info/2008/03/will-altiris-ever-be-more-than-a-subsidiary/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ask and you shall receive? ;-) Now Clarkson knows a bit more about the modern world?</title>
		<link>http://www.techagility.info/2008/01/ask-and-you-shall-receive-now-clarkson-knows-a-bit-more-about-the-modern-world/</link>
		<comments>http://www.techagility.info/2008/01/ask-and-you-shall-receive-now-clarkson-knows-a-bit-more-about-the-modern-world/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jan 2008 00:26:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>dcaddick</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Security]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techagility.info/2008/01/08/ask-and-you-shall-receive-now-clarkson-knows-a-bit-more-about-the-modern-world/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Well I do find this amusing as last night we were just watching the Top Gear episode where Ranulph Clarkson and Ranulph May attempt to race Ranulph Hammond to the North Pole using a truck &#8211; as ever Jeremy Clarkson is forever the irreverent motor mouth and larrikin in a likeable way and we actually [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.techagility.info/2008/01/ask-and-you-shall-receive-now-clarkson-knows-a-bit-more-about-the-modern-world/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Considering migrating or upgrading to Server 2008? here&#8217;s some points to help get you started in the right direction&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://www.techagility.info/2007/11/considering-migrating-or-upgrading-to-server-2008-heres-some-points-to-help-get-you-started-in-the-right-direction/</link>
		<comments>http://www.techagility.info/2007/11/considering-migrating-or-upgrading-to-server-2008-heres-some-points-to-help-get-you-started-in-the-right-direction/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Nov 2007 11:57:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>dcaddick</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blogging]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web/IIS/Web 2.0]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techagility.info/2007/11/18/considering-migrating-or-upgrading-to-server-2008-heres-some-points-to-help-get-you-started-in-the-right-direction/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Judging by my limited experiences with Vista the &#34;security&#34; sounds like it might be a case of how much security you need to turn off until your Server actually communicates with the other devices and runs the Applications correctly? Other than that I&#8217;m looking forward to seeing just how much can be accomplished with Power [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.techagility.info/2007/11/considering-migrating-or-upgrading-to-server-2008-heres-some-points-to-help-get-you-started-in-the-right-direction/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Developing Applications for Server 2008? How to make sure they are compatible with Terminal Server and the other new features:-</title>
		<link>http://www.techagility.info/2007/11/developing-applications-for-server-2008-how-to-make-sure-they-are-compatible-with-terminal-server-and-the-other-new-features/</link>
		<comments>http://www.techagility.info/2007/11/developing-applications-for-server-2008-how-to-make-sure-they-are-compatible-with-terminal-server-and-the-other-new-features/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Nov 2007 23:45:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>dcaddick</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blogging]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Troubleshooting]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techagility.info/2007/11/16/developing-applications-for-server-2008-how-to-make-sure-they-are-compatible-with-terminal-server-and-the-other-new-features/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Back when I was focused on Citrix Servers and helping people get the best out of existing Terminal Server and Citrix Server installations it was somewhat surprising how many Applications AND Developers all do their own thing in whatever way they like with no regards to Standards like these. There was similar material from Microsoft [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.techagility.info/2007/11/developing-applications-for-server-2008-how-to-make-sure-they-are-compatible-with-terminal-server-and-the-other-new-features/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Getting by without Windows Update &#8211; can you update non-Microsoft applications and components as well?</title>
		<link>http://www.techagility.info/2007/10/getting-by-without-windows-update-can-you-update-non-microsoft-applications-and-components-as-well/</link>
		<comments>http://www.techagility.info/2007/10/getting-by-without-windows-update-can-you-update-non-microsoft-applications-and-components-as-well/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Oct 2007 06:09:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>dcaddick</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Troubleshooting]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techagility.info/2007/10/05/getting-by-without-windows-update-can-you-update-non-microsoft-applications-and-components-as-well/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So for those of you who have seen or been feeling the issues recently relating to MS&#8217;s **hidden/silent** update to the Windows Update client components Scott has now come back with not only an alternative, but a solution that further adds value by being able to check other applications and components. In all fairness though [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.techagility.info/2007/10/getting-by-without-windows-update-can-you-update-non-microsoft-applications-and-components-as-well/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Microsoft *gear*ing up for SaaS?</title>
		<link>http://www.techagility.info/2007/09/microsoft-gearing-up-for-saas/</link>
		<comments>http://www.techagility.info/2007/09/microsoft-gearing-up-for-saas/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Sep 2007 12:49:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>dcaddick</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[App Streaming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Blogging]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techagility.info/2007/09/27/microsoft-gearing-up-for-saas/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Some very provocative comments from Randall Kennedy regarding Microsoft&#8217;s possible intentions? Microsoft&#8217;s Virtualization Endgame &#8230;&#8230;. With SoftGrid, Microsoft has the technology portfolio to enable its SaaS endgame strategy. The first salvo was fired at the VMworld conference when Microsoft announced it was decoupling the SoftGrid Virtual Application runtime client from the back-end streaming server (see [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.techagility.info/2007/09/microsoft-gearing-up-for-saas/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Citrix Access Gateway (CAG) Logon point fails to display? (subtitled &#8211; how to gain root access to the CAG&#8217;s underlying OS? and other troubleshooting tips)</title>
		<link>http://www.techagility.info/2006/08/citrix-access-gateway-cag-logon-point-fails-to-display-subtitled-how-to-gain-root-access-to-the-cags-underlying-os-and-other-troubleshooting-tips/</link>
		<comments>http://www.techagility.info/2006/08/citrix-access-gateway-cag-logon-point-fails-to-display-subtitled-how-to-gain-root-access-to-the-cags-underlying-os-and-other-troubleshooting-tips/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Aug 2006 06:56:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>dcaddick</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blogging]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techagility.info/2006/08/26/citrix-access-gateway-cag-logon-point-fails-to-display-subtitled-how-to-gain-root-access-to-the-cags-underlying-os-and-other-troubleshooting-tips/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;ve been keeping a track on this forum entry at Brian Maddens Site for some time as I have seen similar issues elsewhere. http://www.brianmadden.com/forum/tm.aspx?m=50628&#38;mpage=2 It makes very interesting reading, and thanks to mkools for all the very useful info ) It still makes an interesting insight on the device? I&#8217;m just wondering out loud how [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.techagility.info/2006/08/citrix-access-gateway-cag-logon-point-fails-to-display-subtitled-how-to-gain-root-access-to-the-cags-underlying-os-and-other-troubleshooting-tips/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Access Gateway woes&#8230;. Communications Issues between the AAC (Advanced Access Control) and AG (Access Gateway)</title>
		<link>http://www.techagility.info/2006/08/access-gateway-woes-communications-issues-between-the-aac-advanced-access-control-and-ag-access-gateway/</link>
		<comments>http://www.techagility.info/2006/08/access-gateway-woes-communications-issues-between-the-aac-advanced-access-control-and-ag-access-gateway/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Aug 2006 06:54:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>dcaddick</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blogging]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techagility.info/2006/08/10/access-gateway-woes-communications-issues-between-the-aac-advanced-access-control-and-ag-access-gateway/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[(Caveat &#8211; this is based on CAG Version 4.2.3!!) For some reason I would appear to have an Access Gateway that exists in a Customers DMZ and is configured to be attached to a Public IP Address of https://xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx So it would be reasonable to assume that you could at least connect to the gateway [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.techagility.info/2006/08/access-gateway-woes-communications-issues-between-the-aac-advanced-access-control-and-ag-access-gateway/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Citrix Access Gateway 4.2.3 Update released? Have a careful look at &quot;CTX108902 v4.2.2 Hotfix for Citrix Access Gateway&quot;</title>
		<link>http://www.techagility.info/2006/08/citrix-access-gateway-423-update-released-have-a-careful-look-at-ctx108902-v422-hotfix-for-citrix-access-gateway/</link>
		<comments>http://www.techagility.info/2006/08/citrix-access-gateway-423-update-released-have-a-careful-look-at-ctx108902-v422-hotfix-for-citrix-access-gateway/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Aug 2006 07:01:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>dcaddick</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blogging]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techagility.info/2006/08/01/citrix-access-gateway-423-update-released-have-a-careful-look-at-ctx108902-v422-hotfix-for-citrix-access-gateway/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;m just going through a proof of concept at a client&#8217;s site for an AG+AAC Implementation and I was looking at bringing the AG up to 4.2.2 as I heard there were a few critical patches, and interestingly enough the link to 4.2.2 from CTX108902 ends up pointing at a 4.2.3 Download?? BTW &#8211; Don&#8217;t [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.techagility.info/2006/08/citrix-access-gateway-423-update-released-have-a-careful-look-at-ctx108902-v422-hotfix-for-citrix-access-gateway/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Citrix Access Gateway Scalability &#8211; Technical Design Considerations for AG and AAC for 10,000 Users and above (Hint &#8211; use Netscaler? ;-)</title>
		<link>http://www.techagility.info/2006/06/citrix-access-gateway-scalability-technical-design-considerations-for-ag-and-aac-for-10000-users-and-above-hint-use-netscaler/</link>
		<comments>http://www.techagility.info/2006/06/citrix-access-gateway-scalability-technical-design-considerations-for-ag-and-aac-for-10000-users-and-above-hint-use-netscaler/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jun 2006 07:05:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>dcaddick</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blogging]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web/IIS/Web 2.0]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techagility.info/2006/06/28/citrix-access-gateway-scalability-technical-design-considerations-for-ag-and-aac-for-10000-users-and-above-hint-use-netscaler/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Technical Design Considerations for AG and AAC for 10,000 Users&#xA0; The two following pages detail the caveats and considerations that need to be addressed when designing an AG and AAC Implementation for up to 10,000 Users &#xB7; It should be kept in mind that these details were documented as of January 2006 and as such [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.techagility.info/2006/06/citrix-access-gateway-scalability-technical-design-considerations-for-ag-and-aac-for-10000-users-and-above-hint-use-netscaler/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Comprehensive guide to Adding ROOT Certificates to WM5 Devices like C600, O2&#8242;s Xda mini, iMate SP5, HTC Typhoon, HTC Wizard, etc.</title>
		<link>http://www.techagility.info/2006/04/comprehensive-guide-to-adding-root-certificates-to-wm5-devices-like-c600-o2s-xda-mini-imate-sp5-htc-typhoon-htc-wizard-etc/</link>
		<comments>http://www.techagility.info/2006/04/comprehensive-guide-to-adding-root-certificates-to-wm5-devices-like-c600-o2s-xda-mini-imate-sp5-htc-typhoon-htc-wizard-etc/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Apr 2006 01:10:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>dcaddick</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blogging]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techagility.info/2006/04/19/comprehensive-guide-to-adding-root-certificates-to-wm5-devices-like-c600-o2s-xda-mini-imate-sp5-htc-typhoon-htc-wizard-etc/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I found a colleague at work with a new O2 Xda mini was having the same issues as I was a month ago with my Orange C600 in trying to add a ROOT Certificate to the WM5 device once you have upgraded to the MSFP/AKU2 standard and now found that it has upgraded your security [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.techagility.info/2006/04/comprehensive-guide-to-adding-root-certificates-to-wm5-devices-like-c600-o2s-xda-mini-imate-sp5-htc-typhoon-htc-wizard-etc/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Step-by-Step Guide to Deploying Push email with MSFP enabled WM5 Devices &#8211; while working with existing Firewalls like Checkpoint, etc.</title>
		<link>http://www.techagility.info/2006/04/step-by-step-guide-to-deploying-push-email-with-msfp-enabled-wm5-devices-while-working-with-existing-firewalls-like-checkpoint-etc/</link>
		<comments>http://www.techagility.info/2006/04/step-by-step-guide-to-deploying-push-email-with-msfp-enabled-wm5-devices-while-working-with-existing-firewalls-like-checkpoint-etc/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Apr 2006 01:08:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>dcaddick</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blogging]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techagility.info/2006/04/07/step-by-step-guide-to-deploying-push-email-with-msfp-enabled-wm5-devices-while-working-with-existing-firewalls-like-checkpoint-etc/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So Microsoft has posted this article for those who want to deploy Push email but this is interesting that I&#8217;ve noticed this today almost immediately after going through an online discussion with some of the security team at my end that has seen us decide (read &#8211; me capitulate under overwhelming numbers??) to try using [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.techagility.info/2006/04/step-by-step-guide-to-deploying-push-email-with-msfp-enabled-wm5-devices-while-working-with-existing-firewalls-like-checkpoint-etc/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
