89 views
May 12

My only disappointment is that we are currently in the middle of moving our current Solutions Centre from one Office location to the other so it’ll be some while before I get a chance to test this.

It certainly looks quite impressive and it does have some lofty aims, but from a brief look through as well as their well deserved reputation based on Flex Profiles I’m sure this will stand up to it’s promises.

Test Scenario’s
With login VSI you can compare many different scenarios:
• VDI vs. SBC
• VMware, XenServer or Hyper-V running virtual desktops or Terminal/Citrix Servers
• Virtualized XP desktops versus virtualized Vista Desktops
• Performance impact of application streaming technologies
• Impact of (different) virus scanners
• Performance impact of tuning parameters
• Different VDI platforms
• Different Storage platforms
• Impact of changes or updates like service packs or security fixes
• Hardware differences
• x64 vs. 32 bits
• Etc…

I’d be very interested in hearing from anyone who does have the facility to test?

Login Consultants develop presentation virtualization benchmarking tool

Monday, May 12, 2008   |   0 Comments   |   addthis

The consulting firm Login Consultants just opened the beta program of the first benchmarking tool for presentation virtualization: Login Virtual Session Index (VSI).

The product will measures the performance of a remote desktop session served by a Microsoft Terminal Services  / Citrix XenApp server or a VDI virtual machine.

vsi_chart

To run the tool it’s required to have a 4 tiers infrastructure: a domain controller for the authentication a file server for logging user sessions, a server to host the TS/XenApp/VDI service and a workstation to launch the user sessions.

The firm is also working to introduce support for application streaming.

Enroll for the beta here.

virtualization.info: Login Consultants develop presentation virtualization benchmarking tool

written by dcaddick

73 views
May 12

So along with Alessandro I’m curious as to why the name ThinApp has been chosen as it does have more than a passing resemblance to Citrix’s new XenApp?

I wonder if this is any indication of the coming marketing campaigns in the push for customers attention in the Desktop Virtualization market? ;-)

VMware ThinApp is the final name for Thinstall technology

In January 2008 VMware, a hardware virtualization company, acquired an application virtualization startup called Thinstall.
The plan is to use the Thinstall technology to stream virtualized applications on the virtual desktops that VMware spawns through its connection broker: the Virtual Desktop Manager (VDM).

So fare VMware has been pretty fast in rebranding the Thinstall Application Virtualization Suite: the beta program for the new version is open since end of February and the testers can already download the beta 2.
The final version of the product, temporarily called Project North Star, is expected for the H2 2008.

The only information missing so far was the final name that VMware wants to use.
Now Micheal Keen, Director and Senior Solutions Architect in the Enterprise Architecture group at Alliance Technologies, reveals that the final name is ThinApp.

Duncan Epping further validates the news reporting that a former Thinstall employee confirmed.

The choice is interesting considering that Citrix just renamed its Presentation Server product in XenApp.

virtualization.info: VMware ThinApp is the final name for Thinstall technology

written by dcaddick

138 views
Apr 10

Hi All,
I’m just looking in to creating a list of the most common objections regarding Thin Clients?

What I have so far is - A PC or Fat Client Advantages are:

  • Always provides a better user experience
  • Fewer server requirements.
  • Better multimedia performance.
  • More flexibility.
  • Better peripheral support.
  • Suitable for poor network connections.
  • Easier to repurpose.
  • Doesn’t need specialist or server knowledge to support.
  • Any technical support issues only affect single users, not multiples.

Does anyone know of any others?
Cheers,
Dave

written by dcaddick

408 views
Apr 06

So I can only guess that it must have been raining all weekend? ;-)

I must confess that I have never needed to resort to using Target Designer to customize the image of the XPe but I am certainly curious as to how it all goes together? Perhaps sometime I’ll be able to justify spending the time?

It does validate that this sort of modification can be accomplished if you’re determined enough?

ASUS EEE PC Running XPe, fun PC!

As part of an ongoing effort on the Windows Embedded team, our management encourages us to seek out new relevant devices to our industry to get a chance to understand these new devices and see how our products may apply.  One of these new gadgets that I felt would apply was the Asus EEE PC!   After ordering one, and patiently waiting, it has finally arrived!  I’m going to use the steps in my previous article on how to run TAP from WinPE to get a hardware profile so I can make an XPe Image for this device. 

clip_image001

Before I do that, here’s some interesting info on the Asus EEE PC.

Specs:

  • Intel Celeron Processor

  • 7” LCD
  • 4GB SSD Storage
  • 512 RAM
  • Built in Wifi and LAN
  • Built in SD/MMC Reader
  • 3 USB Ports
  • VGA Out
  • Headphone and Microphone Jacks
  • 4 Cell Battery Lasting about 3 Hours
  • Weight:  2 Pounds!
  • In the Box:

    • Asus EEE PC
    • Battery Charger
    • 4 Cell Battery
    • Restore CD with Windows Drivers

    Size:

    clip_image002
    * Dollar is intended to gauge size, and is not included in the box.

    Okay let’s begin!

    First we need to configure the ASUS system to boot from a USB drive, by default the ASUS is configured to boot from USB.  I am using an M-Systems/Sandisk SSD with a USB Adaptor it shows up in the BIOS as a hard drive, so I must change a setting in the BIOS so it boots the SSD first.

    USB Drive I’m using:

    clip_image003

    Insert your USB Drive into the ASUS System, and then boot into the BIOS by pressing F2.

    clip_image004

    Go to the Boot menu, and then to boot priority, make sure the Removable Disk is set as the first boot device.

    clip_image005

    Now under the Boot Menu, go under Hard Disk Drives, in my case USB:M-Sys uDiskOnCh is set as the 1st Boot Device.

    After you have made these changes, it’s time to reboot the PC and boot into WinPE using your drive you made from my last blog article!

    Once you’re booted into WinPE, run TAP.

    clip_image006

    Be sure to save your mydevices.pmq to a location other than the RAM drive, in my case the D: drive was the actual location for the USB drive.

    Import your mydevices.pmq into Target Designer, add in your components (Many of the drivers for the ASUS are not in Target Designer, see this article on how to Componentize Drivers.), and VIOLA, an XPe image for the ASUS EEE PC.

    Here’s my ASUS booting XPe in the First Boot Agent Stage:

    clip_image007

    I’m going to use my newly created ASUS EEE XPe PC to Remote Desktop into my Office Desktop during meetings.

    clip_image008

    Embedded Windows Team (NT4e, XPe, Vista Embedded) : ASUS EEE PC Running XPe, fun PC!

    written by dcaddick

    186 views
    Mar 14

    Now I have always been a fan of making the PC as small as possible, but this is verging on the ridiculous surely? I’m wondering how useful this device might actually be?

    picotux - the smallest Linux Computer in the World

    The picotux 100 is the world’s smallest Linux computer, only slightly larger (35mm×19mm×19mm) than an RJ45 connector. More information can be found here.

    picotux - smallest Linux computer in the World

    written by dcaddick

    184 views
    Mar 08

    It’s good to see quality products don’t always have to languish in no-man’s land following an acquisition? Hopefully they haven’t lost too much steam and can maintain their enthusiasm? It now just remains to see how VMware integrates this component in to the bigger picture?

    VMware Project North Star Beta (Thinstall) (for Windows Systems)

    Latest Version: Beta | 3/05/08 | Build 3.350

    What’s Coming
    Upcoming enhancements in the VMware Project North Star release:

    • Expand the production services and product quality :
      VMware 24/7 Gold and Platinum Support
      VMware QA
      VMware Professional Services Solution Offerings
      VMware Educational Services
    • New Features:
      Application Link – Connect virtual application packages to enable streamlined deployment.
      Application Sync – Fast, low-bandwidth update model for deployed virtual applications.


    Getting Started

    1. If you are new to application virtualization (Thinstall), watch our introduction webinar, or read the many case studies, whitepapers or information available on our website: www.thinstall.com
    2. Read the documentation
      The VMware Project North Star Beta (Thinstall) documentation contains the necessary information regarding this release, including summary of features, known issues, system requirements plus how to install, setup, and configure this release.
    3. Download the VMware Project North Star Beta (Thinstall) installer.
    4. Start using the product
      Refer to the VMware Project North Star Beta (Thinstall) release notes and documentation for detailed information on installing and using the software.


    VMware Project North Star Beta (Thinstall) feedback and support options

    Your opinion matters most to us. Please submit your feedback using the VMware Project North Star Beta (Thinstall) discussion forum. Please post your suggestions, problems, and experiences to the discussion forum at your convenience.

    Technical Support

    The VMware Project North Star Beta (Thinstall) is open to the public and not supported by VMware until the product becomes generally available. Any support questions or problems should be reported to the Project North Star Beta (Thinstall) forum.

    VMware Project North Star Beta (Thinstall) - VMware

    written by dcaddick

    339 views
    Feb 12

    Now somewhile back I produced the following post regarding any other alternatives to RDP and ICA and at the time I might have been somewhat flippant about NComputing’s model based on Windows XP SP2, and since then there have been a number of other companies like Miniframe jump on the same bandwagon where they are effectively using a desktop based OS to provide concurrent multi-user sessions and I always thought this did somewhat fly in the face of the EULA?

    At the time I was sort of suspecting that MS might have actually been turning something of a blind eye to this in some parts of the world, but now it seems that MS has finally decided to get off the fence (or at least the Lawyers have now made a decision? ;-) and produced this document to clarify things.

    So I’d like to clarify here that this is not that I don’t think NComputing can add value, but in doing any due diligence anyone who seriously wants to consider either NComputing, Miniframe or any other method of using XP SP2 in a multi-user model should seriously check this document from MS before going too far down this path?

    If I was contemplating, or indeed already using this scenario I would be asking the Vendor to review this document from MS and provide some sort of legal indemnification?

    Licensing Windows Client Operating System in Multiuser Scenarios

    This posting is provided “AS IS” with no warranties, and confers no rights. The opinions expressed within are my own and should not be attributed to any other Individual or Company or the one I work for.

    SPICE might be an alternative to ICA and RDP?

    Now this is very interesting news because with all the interest around VDI there is still no real alternative to ICA other than RDP (or VNC…?) and in this I’m not even going to consider Ncomputing’s WoIP, as from a techies point of view this would appear to simply be a rehash of RDP, although I’m prepared to be convinced otherwise?

    But it might be exciting to see that there is a real possible alternative to the ICA/RDP stranglehold and this might have the makings of some interesting changes to how things might be approached in the VDI space?

    ******UPDATE******
    As a consequence of this post I have been contacted by Ncomputing and it would appear that their WoIP is actually what they term a combination of UTMA and UXP and does indeed make the connection/transition/session at a lower level in the stack. However, you will not find much detail on the inner workings of this as it’s proprietary, and I’m still trying to understand how this all plays out with regards to the Microsoft Licensing side of things as detailed here in a post on their Forum
    http://ncomputing.com/ncomputing/wbb2/thread.php?threadid=963&hilightuser=1087

    If/when I find out more I’ll update either here, or as a separate post on my new blog at www.techagility.info
    ******UPDATE******

    SPICE might be an alternative to ICA and RDP?

    written by dcaddick

    315 views
    Feb 09

    In some cases the regular methods of "Going to Market" with a new product is fraught with pitfalls as it is conceived by Marketing and/or Product managers who then seem to loose sight of what the Customer is actually after - I’ve always thought it better to get the product and solution in front of the customer as quickly as possible and let them make up their mind and give feedback?

    In all fairness, with some of the larger Vendor’s there is so much red tape and bureaucracy this makes it nigh on impossible to actually create demo sites like this that Gareth has created - so kudos to him for getting this created.

    What Gareth has alluded to but possibly failed to qualify was, if you don’t have a Citrix ICA client installed then you might also want to think about downloading that elsewhere than from his hosted servers as that will also be quite quicker at over 17Mb for the web client?

    Xendesktop or VDM2? Compare them for yourself

    When the beta code for VDM2 was first released I wanted to push them both out over the Internet, however there was a red tape / NDA issue.

    Now that VDM2 is released I can put both of them out together. All of the components are running as virtual machines on one ESX host. The XP clients are identical in terms of their configuration and resources.

    The two URLs are https://oasxendesktop.oas.co.za for the Citrix XenDesktop and https://VDM2.oas.co.za for the VMware VDM2.

    username is demo
    password is also demo.

    The latency is likely to be pretty awful for those abroad. It is slow but usable in South Africa but I am interested in seeing how the performance is from Europe, I think our under-sea cable terminates in Europe so it will probably be even worse in North America.

    We have unfortunately also been having to contend with an inordinate number of power cuts, so please bear with our Third World infrastructure. Crises notwithstanding, I will try to give you some more details on the configuration some comparisons on the two different mechanisms tomorrow.

    Stop Press:
    Whoa, the reason that the Xendesktop demo worked was that most people already had a Citrix client. The VMware VDI agent is 6MB in size and getting that over our slow link will be hopeless.
    Try to download and install it from http://garethcharlotte.googlepages.com/VMware-vdmclient-2.0.0-403.exe , this is hosted by google and should come down fairly quickly worldwide.

    VMware and CITRIX for South Africa

    written by dcaddick

    610 views
    Dec 05

    Well this certainly sounds good, but I seem to recall that a few years ago there was the Cappuccino PC and the AOpen, just to name a few and there is also a good web site at www.worldssmallestpc.com that has a whole range of devices that come under the small form factor banner.

    The main change with this particular unit would appear to be the lack of an optical drive which frees up the design criteria allowing a much narrower profile from the front and consequently a reduction in volume for the overall unit, It’s also getting less important to support an optical drive what with the growth in size of the USB storage capacity etc.

    I did also note that there appears to be something looking like a TV input on the eBox-4300? but using one of these as a HTPC or Media Extender might be pushing the envelope a bit? ;-)

    World’s smallest Windows XP system?

    DMP Electronics (aka Icop) has announced a tiny silent PC claimed to be the smallest system in the world capable of running Windows XP. The eBox-4300 measures 4.5 x 4.5 x 1.4 inches, has a 500MHz x86-compatible Via processor, and supports up to 1GB or RAM.
    (Click here for a larger view of the eBox-4300)

    If the eBox-4300 looks familiar, that’s because it uses the same case as DMP Electronic’s earlier eBox-2300SX, based on its own 300MHz Vortex86SX SoC. The eBox-2300SX, in turn, is an upgraded version of the eBox-2300 that Microsoft has for several years provided as a development system to competitors in the Embedded Development category of its Imagine Cup student competition.
    Is it really the smallest?
    For the eBox-4300 truly to be the "world’s smallest system running Windows XP," CompactFlash would have to be used, either with Windows XP Embedded or with Windows XP Professional installed via a USB CD-ROM drive. Eight megabytes (8MB) is probably the smallest practical amount of storage for XP Pro; at the time of writing, 8GB CompactFlash cards sell for approximately $75, while 16GB cards approach $200.


    PicoPC1
    (Click for details)

    With a volume of 28.35 cubic inches, though, the eBox-4300 faces a serious rival in the form of the Sharp and Tappin picoPC1 and picoPC2 (pictured at right) based on Via’s Epia PX10000G pico-ITX main board. The picoPC1 is a flash-only system with a volume of just 25.5 cubic inches, and the picoPC2 packs a 2.5-inch hard drive into a 32.3-inch volume. Other contenders in the tiny XP-capable PC arena are CompuLab’s recently shipped fit-PC and Manufactum’s Manuscriptum.
    These and other low-cost thick client systems have been shrinking steadily, but bragging rights for diminutive size will likely always go to devices specifically designed to be portable. OQO’s Model 2, for instance, measures just 18.5 cubic inches, including a 5-inch display, the capability of running Windows XP or Vista from a 120GB hard drive, and EV-DO wireless WAN capabilities. Ranging from approximately $1,300 to $2,400 depending on options, the OQO likely costs as much as five eBox-4300 systems, however.


    OQO Model O2 is smaller, but costs nearly $1,500
    (Click for details)

    The eBox 4300
    While retaining the eBox-2300[SX]’s size and weight (18 ounces), the eBox-4300 shifts to a slightly higher gear, employing the 500MHz Eden ULV processor introduced by Via in August. The tiny box also uses Via’s CX700M integrated northbridge/southbridge.
    According to Via, this processor and companion chip consume a combined maximum of 4.5 watts. Understandably, then, the little eBox-4300 is able to operate without a fan. Its light weight also allows the system to be hung from the back of any monitor that sports VESA standard mounting holes, according to DMP.


    eBox-4300 ports

    The eBox-4300 comes with 512MB of DDR2 RAM onboard and is said to accept up to 1GB. The PC also features Via’s UniChrome Pro II 3D/2D graphics core, offering acceleration for MPEG-2/-4 and WMV9 decoding, plus a VGA output that is said to support resolutions up to 1920 x 1440 pixels.
    While the eBox-4300 apparently does not have room for a hard drive internally, it does offer an internally accessible EIDE (UltraDMA 133) connector that could be used to add one. Storage could also be added via the system’s three USB ports (two on the front, one on the rear), or its Type II/III CompactFlash slot.
    Features and specifications listed by DMP/Icop for the eBox-4300 include:

    • Processor — Via Eden ULV processor clocked at 500MHz
    • Memory — 512MB of DDR2 RAM, expandable to 1GB
    • Display — Via UniChrome II, supporting resolutions up to 1920 x 1440 pixels
    • Networking — 1 x 10/100 Ethernet port (Realtek RTL8100B chipset)
    • Other I/O:
      • 2 x RS-232
      • VGA
      • 1 x PS/2 (supports keyboard and mouse with Y-adapter)
      • 1 x EIDE (UltraDMA 133)
      • Audio — mic in, line out
    • Expansion:
      • 1 x Type II/III CompactFlash slot
      • 1 x miniPCI socket
    • Dimensions — 4.5 x 4.5 x 1.4 inches
    • Weight — 18 ounces
    • Operating temperature — 0 to 60 deg. C (32 to 140 deg. F)

    According to ICOP, the eBox-4300 will be available in January. Operating system support was cited as being for Windows XP Embedded and "XP-oriented platforms," although the device should also support XP Pro with a large enough CompactFlash card or external drive. Additionally, Linux support seems likely to arrive in due course, given that a variant of the earlier eBox-2300 was recently billed as the world’s lowest cost Linux thin client by Bangkok-based Norhtec.

    World’s smallest Windows XP system?

    written by dcaddick

    362 views
    Nov 19

    So not only has Asus finally managed to roll out the Eee PC, but it seems like there will be a slightly larger model, and they are releasing news about an up and coming UMPC that does look like it might have legs?

    Engadget: Asus confirms the 8GB 10-inch Eee PC

    Posted Nov 14th 2007 11:06AM by Nilay Patel
    Filed under: Laptops

    Asus has been coyly hinting at a spec-bumped Eee PC for a while now, but it looks like the wink-and-nudge days are over — German Asus spokesman Holger Schmidt said that an 8GB Eee PC with a 10-inch screen would ship in 2008, as well as that equally-rumored but far less sexy desktop Eee. See, sometimes dreams do come true.
    [Read link is in German]

    Asus confirms the 8GB 10-inch Eee PC - Engadget

    ASUS’ R50A set to "redefine mobile"

    Posted Nov 14th 2007 7:56AM by Thomas Ricker
    Filed under: GPS, Handhelds, Laptops, Tablet PCs

    All we have is this picture for now and the promise of more around CES in January, but that’s Asus’ R50A right there. It’s listed as a UMPC and said to "redefine mobile" with full PC and GPS functionality. Funny, we thought that’s what those gen one UMPCs were supposed to do 1.5 years ago. Anyway, this looks to be the R3 we’ve already peeped sporting a 4.8-inch display with abiggie1024 x 600 resolution.

    ASUS’ R50A set to "redefine mobile"

    written by dcaddick