<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>TechAgility &#187; Thin Clients</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.techagility.info/category/thin-clients/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.techagility.info</link>
	<description>using Technology to become more Agile at work and play - and more thoughts on VDI, Thin Clients, VMware, Citrix, etc...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 28 Jul 2010 06:46:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
		<item>
		<title>TechEd 2010 Session online &#8211; available in WMV, MP4 and PPT</title>
		<link>http://www.techagility.info/2010/06/teched-2010-session-online-available-in-wmv-mp4-and-ppt/</link>
		<comments>http://www.techagility.info/2010/06/teched-2010-session-online-available-in-wmv-mp4-and-ppt/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jun 2010 06:18:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>dcaddick</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Remote Protocols]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Server 2008]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Thin Clients]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VDI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Virtualization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows 7]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techagility.info/2010/06/teched-2010-session-online-available-in-wmv-mp4-and-ppt/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[After doing some serious digging it appears that there was well over 400 sessions at MS TechEd 2010 – to be honest I ended up giving up as I figured I’d found way more material than I will be able to get through in quite a long time. MS are to be commended for being [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.techagility.info/2010/06/teched-2010-session-online-available-in-wmv-mp4-and-ppt/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Managing Thin Clients running Windows Embedded Standard (WES) 2009 from SCCM 2007 &#8211; is it possible?</title>
		<link>http://www.techagility.info/2010/05/managing-thin-clients-running-windows-embedded-standard-wes-2009-from-sccm-2007-is-it-possible/</link>
		<comments>http://www.techagility.info/2010/05/managing-thin-clients-running-windows-embedded-standard-wes-2009-from-sccm-2007-is-it-possible/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 May 2010 13:33:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>dcaddick</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Hardware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Thin Clients]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[XPe]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techagility.info/2010/05/managing-thin-clients-running-windows-embedded-standard-wes-2009-from-sccm-2007-is-it-possible/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I was recently looking for info regarding how to manage or integrate Windows Thin Clients (XPe/WES) with SCCM. To the best of my knowledge the formal stance has always been “we supply the Macro components to support SCCM Agents in the build – the rest is up to the Customer” and my understanding is that [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.techagility.info/2010/05/managing-thin-clients-running-windows-embedded-standard-wes-2009-from-sccm-2007-is-it-possible/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Windows Embedded Standard 7 (WES7) RTM has Shipped!</title>
		<link>http://www.techagility.info/2010/04/windows-embedded-standard-7-wes7-rtm-has-shipped/</link>
		<comments>http://www.techagility.info/2010/04/windows-embedded-standard-7-wes7-rtm-has-shipped/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Apr 2010 04:52:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>dcaddick</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Server 2008]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Thin Clients]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows 7]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techagility.info/2010/04/windows-embedded-standard-7-wes7-rtm-has-shipped/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So this should certainly fire up peoples plans about adopting Thin Clients and I guess MS will be more than happy that folks will be queuing up to try new devices on their RDS via Windows Server 2008? And more here:&#160; Microsoft launches Windows 7-based embedded OS So why will this be a big deal? [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.techagility.info/2010/04/windows-embedded-standard-7-wes7-rtm-has-shipped/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Justifying VDI &#8211; Part One &#171; EMC IT&#8217;s Journey to the Private Cloud</title>
		<link>http://www.techagility.info/2010/04/justifying-vdi-part-one-emc-its-journey-to-the-private-cloud/</link>
		<comments>http://www.techagility.info/2010/04/justifying-vdi-part-one-emc-its-journey-to-the-private-cloud/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Apr 2010 13:21:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>dcaddick</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Remote Protocols]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Thin Clients]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VDI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VMware]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techagility.info/2010/04/justifying-vdi-part-one-emc-its-journey-to-the-private-cloud/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I came across this very interesting post today as something that both validates the “Client Virtualization” approach (I think VDI is a bit too narrow as a definition?) and yet at the same time tells a cautionary tale about how it’s not as easy as it’s sometimes made out to be? and it is way [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.techagility.info/2010/04/justifying-vdi-part-one-emc-its-journey-to-the-private-cloud/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What should we expect in 2010?</title>
		<link>http://www.techagility.info/2010/01/what-should-we-expect-in-2010/</link>
		<comments>http://www.techagility.info/2010/01/what-should-we-expect-in-2010/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jan 2010 19:35:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>dcaddick</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Finance and Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Thin Clients]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techagility.info/2010/01/what-should-we-expect-in-2010/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is just some ramblings from me over the xmas/new year break and some general thoughts about the global economy and some technical thoughts Economy Option ARM’s &#8211; could this be the harbinger of the Second Wave of Foreclosures in the US?&#160; Subprime Loans Caused the Initial Illness, Option ARMs will Cause the Relapse OptionARM [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.techagility.info/2010/01/what-should-we-expect-in-2010/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Installing WES 2011 CTP2 on a VM &#8211; it&#8217;s likely that 2Gb Flash will be sufficient? If you want Windows 7, and only 1.5Gb &#8211; will this be *THE* VDI base OS of choice?</title>
		<link>http://www.techagility.info/2010/01/installing-wes-2011-ctp2-on-a-vm-its-likely-that-2gb-flash-will-be-sufficient-but-will-mss-licensing-allow-upgrades/</link>
		<comments>http://www.techagility.info/2010/01/installing-wes-2011-ctp2-on-a-vm-its-likely-that-2gb-flash-will-be-sufficient-but-will-mss-licensing-allow-upgrades/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jan 2010 05:48:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>dcaddick</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Fun and Cool Stuff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hardware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Remote Protocols]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Thin Clients]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VDI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VMware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Virtualization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows 7]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[XPe]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techagility.info/2010/01/installing-wes-2011-ctp2-on-a-vm-its-likely-that-2gb-flash-will-be-sufficient-but-will-mss-licensing-allow-upgrades/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Just a brief update as to some of the changes that I have discovered in WES 2011 CTP2 (as opposed to the original CTP) – this was simply built on a default VM Template based on Windows 7. Also some useful reference links: Windows Embedded Standard 2011 CTP2 New Features and Changes Discovering Windows Embedded [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.techagility.info/2010/01/installing-wes-2011-ctp2-on-a-vm-its-likely-that-2gb-flash-will-be-sufficient-but-will-mss-licensing-allow-upgrades/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Musings on VDI performance</title>
		<link>http://www.techagility.info/2009/12/musings-on-vdi-performance/</link>
		<comments>http://www.techagility.info/2009/12/musings-on-vdi-performance/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Dec 2009 05:58:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>dcaddick</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[App Streaming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Citrix]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Finance and Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Networks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Performance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Remote Protocols]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Thin Clients]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VDI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VMware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Virtualization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows 7]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techagility.info/?p=447</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So as things slowdown in the lead up to the break I have had some time to get back and review some twitter posts and other blog articles that I have been meaning to catch up on. I must admit that I tend not to use Twitter that much but do find it quite useful [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.techagility.info/2009/12/musings-on-vdi-performance/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Looking deeper in to the T5545 ThinPro Linux Thin Client from HP &#8211; and how to tweak it and make deployments a breeze?</title>
		<link>http://www.techagility.info/2009/10/looking-deeper-in-to-the-t5545-thinpro-linux-thin-client-from-hp-and-how-to-tweak-it-and-make-deployments-a-breeze/</link>
		<comments>http://www.techagility.info/2009/10/looking-deeper-in-to-the-t5545-thinpro-linux-thin-client-from-hp-and-how-to-tweak-it-and-make-deployments-a-breeze/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Oct 2009 13:26:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>dcaddick</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Citrix]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HP/Neoware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Linux]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Thin Clients]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VDI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[XenApp]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techagility.info/2009/10/looking-deeper-in-to-the-t5545-thinpro-linux-thin-client-from-hp-and-how-to-tweak-it-and-make-deployments-a-breeze/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The T5545 Thin Client from HP is quite a neat mid-range device that has some nice features that can make your life quite easy, but so far it seems that it’s not all that easy to find out how to go about tweaking it to your environment and users? I’ll update this later with some [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.techagility.info/2009/10/looking-deeper-in-to-the-t5545-thinpro-linux-thin-client-from-hp-and-how-to-tweak-it-and-make-deployments-a-breeze/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Some recent comments around Client Virtualization, View, XenDesktop, Remote Protocols,etc&#8230; now that VMworld 2009 has been and gone</title>
		<link>http://www.techagility.info/2009/09/some-recent-comments-around-client-virtualization-view-xendesktop-remote-protocolsetc-now-that-vmworld-2009-has-been-and-gone/</link>
		<comments>http://www.techagility.info/2009/09/some-recent-comments-around-client-virtualization-view-xendesktop-remote-protocolsetc-now-that-vmworld-2009-has-been-and-gone/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Sep 2009 01:54:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>dcaddick</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blades]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Citrix]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hardware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Remote Protocols]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Thin Clients]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VDI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VMware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Virtualization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[XenApp]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[XenServer]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techagility.info/2009/09/some-recent-comments-around-client-virtualization-view-xendesktop-remote-protocolsetc-now-that-vmworld-2009-has-been-and-gone/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The best piece I have read from the IT Industry in the last two weeks or so is: Why desktop virtualization projects fail Desktop virtualization is one of the hottest topics of interest and a major initiative of many companies. Touted benefits include lower operating costs, simpler management and desktop mobility. Below we’ll explore what [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.techagility.info/2009/09/some-recent-comments-around-client-virtualization-view-xendesktop-remote-protocolsetc-now-that-vmworld-2009-has-been-and-gone/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>10</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Fujitsu Esprimo Q1500 Windows 7 Media Center Mini HTPC &#124; eHomeUpgrade</title>
		<link>http://www.techagility.info/2009/09/fujitsu-esprimo-q1500-windows-7-media-center-mini-htpc-ehomeupgrade/</link>
		<comments>http://www.techagility.info/2009/09/fujitsu-esprimo-q1500-windows-7-media-center-mini-htpc-ehomeupgrade/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Sep 2009 05:05:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>dcaddick</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[HTPC - Home Theatre PC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Thin Clients]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows 7]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techagility.info/2009/09/fujitsu-esprimo-q1500-windows-7-media-center-mini-htpc-ehomeupgrade/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Well with the release of the Windows 7 Embedded and how easy it is to create a customer Embedded OS I was almost considering getting back on my high horse to use a Thin Client (with added HDD? ) to create my idea of a small ultra quiet Home Theatre PC – but then I [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.techagility.info/2009/09/fujitsu-esprimo-q1500-windows-7-media-center-mini-htpc-ehomeupgrade/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Server 2008 R2 &#8211; Trying to deliver &quot;Pooled Virtual Desktops&quot;??? Is there something I&#8217;ve missed? ;-)</title>
		<link>http://www.techagility.info/2009/09/server-2008-r2-trying-to-deliver-pooled-virtual-desktops-is-there-something-ive-missed/</link>
		<comments>http://www.techagility.info/2009/09/server-2008-r2-trying-to-deliver-pooled-virtual-desktops-is-there-something-ive-missed/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Sep 2009 08:57:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>dcaddick</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Remote Protocols]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Thin Clients]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VDI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Virtualization]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techagility.info/2009/09/server-2008-r2-trying-to-deliver-pooled-virtual-desktops-is-there-something-ive-missed/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hi All, I have created a number of HyperV Servers that all have at least 1 instance of a Windows 7 VM running – and yet it seems that the Admin Tool from MS is *very* restricted in that there is no way to *pick* the VM’s up? They have to be auto-recognised somehow? With [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.techagility.info/2009/09/server-2008-r2-trying-to-deliver-pooled-virtual-desktops-is-there-something-ive-missed/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Citrix &#8220;announces&#8221; HDX-3D on ahead of VMworld, but no sign of a download or trial yet?</title>
		<link>http://www.techagility.info/2009/09/citrix-announces-hdx-3d-on-ahead-of-vmworld-but-no-sign-of-a-download-or-trial-yet/</link>
		<comments>http://www.techagility.info/2009/09/citrix-announces-hdx-3d-on-ahead-of-vmworld-but-no-sign-of-a-download-or-trial-yet/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Aug 2009 13:08:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>dcaddick</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Citrix]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Networks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Performance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Remote Protocols]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Thin Clients]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VDI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VMware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows 7]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[XPe]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techagility.info/2009/09/citrix-announces-hdx-3d-on-ahead-of-vmworld-but-no-sign-of-a-download-or-trial-yet/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So it’s hardly a surprise that Citrix have decided to “Announce” the long awaited HDX-3D “high quality user experience” protocol enhancement in the early hours prior to the start of the VMworld conference? Pardon me for being something of a sceptic, but it seems that this might have more to do with the fact that [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.techagility.info/2009/09/citrix-announces-hdx-3d-on-ahead-of-vmworld-but-no-sign-of-a-download-or-trial-yet/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>I have been chasing Network issues lately and have come across these very useful *FREE* Tools that both work under Windows 7</title>
		<link>http://www.techagility.info/2009/08/i-have-been-chasing-network-issues-lately-and-have-come-across-these-very-useful-free-tools-that-both-work-under-windows-7/</link>
		<comments>http://www.techagility.info/2009/08/i-have-been-chasing-network-issues-lately-and-have-come-across-these-very-useful-free-tools-that-both-work-under-windows-7/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Aug 2009 01:45:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>dcaddick</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Hardware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Networks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Performance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Remote Protocols]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Thin Clients]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Troubleshooting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vista]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WiFi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows 7]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[XPe]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techagility.info/2009/08/i-have-been-chasing-network-issues-lately-and-have-come-across-these-very-useful-free-tools-that-both-work-under-windows-7/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Some while back one of my US based colleagues passed on some advice about checking out some details on how to get the best out of Wireshark For anyone interested in getting their feet wet using Wireshark the network protocol analyzer.&#160; This knowledge can be useful to have when dealing with network anomalies. www.chappellseminars.com/s-wireshark101.html Download [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.techagility.info/2009/08/i-have-been-chasing-network-issues-lately-and-have-come-across-these-very-useful-free-tools-that-both-work-under-windows-7/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>22</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>HP&#8217;s range of Linux Thin Clients getting a refresh?</title>
		<link>http://www.techagility.info/2009/08/hps-range-of-linux-thin-clients-getting-a-refresh/</link>
		<comments>http://www.techagility.info/2009/08/hps-range-of-linux-thin-clients-getting-a-refresh/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Aug 2009 11:52:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>dcaddick</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Citrix]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HP/Neoware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hardware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Linux]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Thin Clients]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VDI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[XenApp]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techagility.info/2009/08/hps-range-of-linux-thin-clients-getting-a-refresh/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So some of you may be aware that the new T5545 was released some while back with a new O/S designated ThinPro – this has recently been updated with a new release of Build 31 and now looks a little like this in Admin mode: To switch to Admin mode there is a simple menu [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.techagility.info/2009/08/hps-range-of-linux-thin-clients-getting-a-refresh/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Planning a Desktop Virtualization project? &#8211; it might be worth making sure you investigate if the Business needs a Remote Protocol that can deliver a &#8220;High Quality User Experience&#8221;? Is RDP7 up to it?</title>
		<link>http://www.techagility.info/2009/06/planning-a-desktop-virtualization-project-it-might-be-worth-making-sure-you-investigate-if-the-business-needs-a-remote-protocol-that-can-deliver-a-high-quality-user-experience/</link>
		<comments>http://www.techagility.info/2009/06/planning-a-desktop-virtualization-project-it-might-be-worth-making-sure-you-investigate-if-the-business-needs-a-remote-protocol-that-can-deliver-a-high-quality-user-experience/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Jun 2009 11:08:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>dcaddick</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Citrix]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HP/Neoware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Networks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Performance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Remote Protocols]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Thin Clients]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VDI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Virtualization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows 7]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techagility.info/?p=370</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[***UPDATE*** Please check the comments below – but it appears I’m incorrect on the statement regarding Teradici PCoIP needing a PCI card, there is a SW/SW version in development and I’d be guessing this might be coming out sometime around VMworld as Beta? Just a guess on my part? So just as we headed in [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.techagility.info/2009/06/planning-a-desktop-virtualization-project-it-might-be-worth-making-sure-you-investigate-if-the-business-needs-a-remote-protocol-that-can-deliver-a-high-quality-user-experience/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Getting Citrix XenDesktop Receiver working on Windows XPe Thin Clients</title>
		<link>http://www.techagility.info/2009/06/getting-citrix-xendesktop-receiver-working-on-windows-xpe-thin-clients/</link>
		<comments>http://www.techagility.info/2009/06/getting-citrix-xendesktop-receiver-working-on-windows-xpe-thin-clients/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Jun 2009 04:19:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>dcaddick</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Citrix]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HP/Neoware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hardware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Thin Clients]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VDI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[XPe]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techagility.info/2009/06/getting-citrix-xendesktop-receiver-working-on-windows-xpe-thin-clients/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If installing Citrix XenDesktop Receiver on any HP Thin Client with Windows XPe *prior* to the most recent release (Build 710) you may get an error, even after removing the original Citrix Client, that it is unable to install because of a previous Citrix Client install still exists&#8230;  I didn’t really waste any time on [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.techagility.info/2009/06/getting-citrix-xendesktop-receiver-working-on-windows-xpe-thin-clients/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Getting Citrix Printing working with the T5735 Thin Client</title>
		<link>http://www.techagility.info/2009/06/getting-citrix-printing-working-with-the-t5735-thin-client/</link>
		<comments>http://www.techagility.info/2009/06/getting-citrix-printing-working-with-the-t5735-thin-client/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2009 04:30:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>dcaddick</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[HP/Neoware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Linux]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Thin Clients]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techagility.info/2009/06/getting-citrix-printing-working-with-the-t5735-thin-client/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Essentially, the printer needs to be configured locally first, pretty much the same way you have it now. There’s additional information, with screen shots on how to configure this for ICA starting page 22 of the attached guide: http://bizsupport2.austin.hp.com/bc/docs/support/SupportManual/c01367435/c01367435.pdf I’ve also reference a guide to supported HP printers with Citrix, just in case: http://h20195.www2.hp.com/v2/GetPDF.aspx/4AA0-8465ENW.pdf]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.techagility.info/2009/06/getting-citrix-printing-working-with-the-t5735-thin-client/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Want to update your HP XPe Thin Client to SP3?</title>
		<link>http://www.techagility.info/2009/06/want-to-update-your-hp-xpe-thin-client-to-sp3/</link>
		<comments>http://www.techagility.info/2009/06/want-to-update-your-hp-xpe-thin-client-to-sp3/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2009 04:01:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>dcaddick</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Thin Clients]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techagility.info/2009/06/want-to-update-your-hp-xpe-thin-client-to-sp3/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[For those who want to update their existing XP embedded Thin Client to SP3 – here are the links depending on which model you have? 5730 &#38; 5630 (also supports 5720): http://h20000.www2.hp.com/bizsupport/TechSupport/SoftwareDescription.jsp?lang=en&#38;cc=us&#38;prodTypeId=12454&#38;prodSeriesId=3634720&#38;swItem=vc-71017-1&#38;prodNameId=3634724&#38;swEnvOID=1058&#38;swLang=13&#38;taskId=135&#38;mode=3 2533: http://h20000.www2.hp.com/bizsupport/TechSupport/SoftwareDescription.jsp?lang=en&#38;cc=us&#38;prodTypeId=321957&#38;prodSeriesId=3691093&#38;swItem=ob-70258-1&#38;prodNameId=3691094&#38;swEnvOID=1058&#38;swLang=13&#38;taskId=135&#38;mode=3 6720: http://h20000.www2.hp.com/bizsupport/TechSupport/SoftwareDescription.jsp?lang=en&#38;cc=us&#38;prodTypeId=321957&#38;prodSeriesId=3660785&#38;prodNameId=3660787&#38;swEnvOID=1058&#38;swLang=13&#38;mode=2&#38;taskId=135&#38;swItem=ob-70196-1]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.techagility.info/2009/06/want-to-update-your-hp-xpe-thin-client-to-sp3/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>TCO/ROI calculations for Thin Clients</title>
		<link>http://www.techagility.info/2009/05/tcoroi-calculations-for-thin-clients/</link>
		<comments>http://www.techagility.info/2009/05/tcoroi-calculations-for-thin-clients/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 May 2009 05:09:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>dcaddick</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Hardware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Thin Clients]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VDI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Virtualization]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techagility.info/2009/05/tcoroi-calculations-for-thin-clients/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I was asked an interesting question at Tech@Work last week here in Sydney – I was asked by someone from Local Govt. where they could find TCO or ROI Calculators for justifying the purchase of Thin Clients. This chap also wanted know where the break-even cost was for implementing Thin Clients? So after chatting to [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.techagility.info/2009/05/tcoroi-calculations-for-thin-clients/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>17</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Can VDI be delivered via a cheap OS Virtualization mechanism that might beat the mature Hypervisors on both price AND graphics performance?</title>
		<link>http://www.techagility.info/2008/12/can-vdi-be-delivered-via-a-cheap-os-virtualization-mechanism-that-might-beat-the-mature-hypervisors-on-both-price-and-graphics-performance/</link>
		<comments>http://www.techagility.info/2008/12/can-vdi-be-delivered-via-a-cheap-os-virtualization-mechanism-that-might-beat-the-mature-hypervisors-on-both-price-and-graphics-performance/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 2008 02:57:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>dcaddick</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blades]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Citrix]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hardware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Performance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Remote Protocols]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Thin Clients]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VDI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VMware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Virtualization]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techagility.info/2008/12/can-vdi-be-delivered-via-a-cheap-os-virtualization-mechanism-that-might-beat-the-mature-hypervisors-on-both-price-and-graphics-performance/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Well thanks to an article by Alessandro at virtualization.info I have become aware of a company called iCore Software that appear to be heading down the virtualization path similar to Parallels in that it is OS based Virtualization. iCore brings OS virtualization to the clients, selling its containers, called Virtual Accounts, as different user personalities [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.techagility.info/2008/12/can-vdi-be-delivered-via-a-cheap-os-virtualization-mechanism-that-might-beat-the-mature-hypervisors-on-both-price-and-graphics-performance/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
