<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>TechAgility &#187; VDI</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.techagility.info/category/vdi/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.techagility.info</link>
	<description>using Technology to become more Agile at work and play - and more thoughts on VDI, Thin Clients, VMware, Citrix, etc...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 28 Jul 2010 06:46:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Errors when trying to add vCenter to vWorkspace 7.x after the original install</title>
		<link>http://www.techagility.info/2010/06/errors-when-trying-to-add-vcenter-to-vworkspace-7-x-after-the-original-install/</link>
		<comments>http://www.techagility.info/2010/06/errors-when-trying-to-add-vcenter-to-vworkspace-7-x-after-the-original-install/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jun 2010 12:18:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>dcaddick</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[VDI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VMware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Virtualization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vWorkspace]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techagility.info/2010/06/errors-when-trying-to-add-vcenter-to-vworkspace-7-x-after-the-original-install/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The communications to and from the VMware vCenter are encrypted via port 443 and as such use certificates to ensure their security. There is the ability to add the keystore from a VMware vCenter during the initial install of vWorkspace 7.x – however it is not possible (at the moment ) to go back and [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.techagility.info/2010/06/errors-when-trying-to-add-vcenter-to-vworkspace-7-x-after-the-original-install/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>TechEd 2010 Session online &#8211; available in WMV, MP4 and PPT</title>
		<link>http://www.techagility.info/2010/06/teched-2010-session-online-available-in-wmv-mp4-and-ppt/</link>
		<comments>http://www.techagility.info/2010/06/teched-2010-session-online-available-in-wmv-mp4-and-ppt/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jun 2010 06:18:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>dcaddick</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Remote Protocols]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Server 2008]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Thin Clients]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VDI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Virtualization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows 7]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techagility.info/2010/06/teched-2010-session-online-available-in-wmv-mp4-and-ppt/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[After doing some serious digging it appears that there was well over 400 sessions at MS TechEd 2010 – to be honest I ended up giving up as I figured I’d found way more material than I will be able to get through in quite a long time. MS are to be commended for being [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.techagility.info/2010/06/teched-2010-session-online-available-in-wmv-mp4-and-ppt/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Justifying VDI &#8211; Part One &#171; EMC IT&#8217;s Journey to the Private Cloud</title>
		<link>http://www.techagility.info/2010/04/justifying-vdi-part-one-emc-its-journey-to-the-private-cloud/</link>
		<comments>http://www.techagility.info/2010/04/justifying-vdi-part-one-emc-its-journey-to-the-private-cloud/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Apr 2010 13:21:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>dcaddick</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Remote Protocols]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Thin Clients]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VDI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VMware]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techagility.info/2010/04/justifying-vdi-part-one-emc-its-journey-to-the-private-cloud/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I came across this very interesting post today as something that both validates the “Client Virtualization” approach (I think VDI is a bit too narrow as a definition?) and yet at the same time tells a cautionary tale about how it’s not as easy as it’s sometimes made out to be? and it is way [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.techagility.info/2010/04/justifying-vdi-part-one-emc-its-journey-to-the-private-cloud/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Installing WES 2011 CTP2 on a VM &#8211; it&#8217;s likely that 2Gb Flash will be sufficient? If you want Windows 7, and only 1.5Gb &#8211; will this be *THE* VDI base OS of choice?</title>
		<link>http://www.techagility.info/2010/01/installing-wes-2011-ctp2-on-a-vm-its-likely-that-2gb-flash-will-be-sufficient-but-will-mss-licensing-allow-upgrades/</link>
		<comments>http://www.techagility.info/2010/01/installing-wes-2011-ctp2-on-a-vm-its-likely-that-2gb-flash-will-be-sufficient-but-will-mss-licensing-allow-upgrades/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jan 2010 05:48:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>dcaddick</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Fun and Cool Stuff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hardware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Remote Protocols]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Thin Clients]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VDI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VMware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Virtualization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows 7]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[XPe]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techagility.info/2010/01/installing-wes-2011-ctp2-on-a-vm-its-likely-that-2gb-flash-will-be-sufficient-but-will-mss-licensing-allow-upgrades/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Just a brief update as to some of the changes that I have discovered in WES 2011 CTP2 (as opposed to the original CTP) – this was simply built on a default VM Template based on Windows 7. Also some useful reference links: Windows Embedded Standard 2011 CTP2 New Features and Changes Discovering Windows Embedded [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.techagility.info/2010/01/installing-wes-2011-ctp2-on-a-vm-its-likely-that-2gb-flash-will-be-sufficient-but-will-mss-licensing-allow-upgrades/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Top 10 business technology trends for 2010 from SMH.com.au &#8211; with additional 2 cents :-)</title>
		<link>http://www.techagility.info/2009/12/top-10-business-technology-trends-for-2010-from-smh-com-au-with-additional-2-cents/</link>
		<comments>http://www.techagility.info/2009/12/top-10-business-technology-trends-for-2010-from-smh-com-au-with-additional-2-cents/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Dec 2009 11:44:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>dcaddick</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blogging]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hardware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Performance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VDI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Virtualization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows 7]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techagility.info/2009/12/top-10-business-technology-trends-for-2010-from-smh-com-au-with-additional-2-cents/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Now I don’t always figure that the local Newspaper is going to be a good place to pick up this sort of info, but in this case I think Simon from the Sydney Morning Herald has done more than just a decent job – so for what it’s worth I&#8217;m reposting but add my 2 [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.techagility.info/2009/12/top-10-business-technology-trends-for-2010-from-smh-com-au-with-additional-2-cents/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Musings on VDI performance</title>
		<link>http://www.techagility.info/2009/12/musings-on-vdi-performance/</link>
		<comments>http://www.techagility.info/2009/12/musings-on-vdi-performance/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Dec 2009 05:58:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>dcaddick</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[App Streaming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Citrix]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Finance and Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Networks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Performance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Remote Protocols]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Thin Clients]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VDI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VMware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Virtualization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows 7]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techagility.info/?p=447</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So as things slowdown in the lead up to the break I have had some time to get back and review some twitter posts and other blog articles that I have been meaning to catch up on. I must admit that I tend not to use Twitter that much but do find it quite useful [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.techagility.info/2009/12/musings-on-vdi-performance/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Looking deeper in to the T5545 ThinPro Linux Thin Client from HP &#8211; and how to tweak it and make deployments a breeze?</title>
		<link>http://www.techagility.info/2009/10/looking-deeper-in-to-the-t5545-thinpro-linux-thin-client-from-hp-and-how-to-tweak-it-and-make-deployments-a-breeze/</link>
		<comments>http://www.techagility.info/2009/10/looking-deeper-in-to-the-t5545-thinpro-linux-thin-client-from-hp-and-how-to-tweak-it-and-make-deployments-a-breeze/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Oct 2009 13:26:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>dcaddick</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Citrix]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HP/Neoware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Linux]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Thin Clients]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VDI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[XenApp]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techagility.info/2009/10/looking-deeper-in-to-the-t5545-thinpro-linux-thin-client-from-hp-and-how-to-tweak-it-and-make-deployments-a-breeze/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The T5545 Thin Client from HP is quite a neat mid-range device that has some nice features that can make your life quite easy, but so far it seems that it’s not all that easy to find out how to go about tweaking it to your environment and users? I’ll update this later with some [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.techagility.info/2009/10/looking-deeper-in-to-the-t5545-thinpro-linux-thin-client-from-hp-and-how-to-tweak-it-and-make-deployments-a-breeze/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Some recent comments around Client Virtualization, View, XenDesktop, Remote Protocols,etc&#8230; now that VMworld 2009 has been and gone</title>
		<link>http://www.techagility.info/2009/09/some-recent-comments-around-client-virtualization-view-xendesktop-remote-protocolsetc-now-that-vmworld-2009-has-been-and-gone/</link>
		<comments>http://www.techagility.info/2009/09/some-recent-comments-around-client-virtualization-view-xendesktop-remote-protocolsetc-now-that-vmworld-2009-has-been-and-gone/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Sep 2009 01:54:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>dcaddick</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blades]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Citrix]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hardware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Remote Protocols]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Thin Clients]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VDI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VMware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Virtualization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[XenApp]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[XenServer]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techagility.info/2009/09/some-recent-comments-around-client-virtualization-view-xendesktop-remote-protocolsetc-now-that-vmworld-2009-has-been-and-gone/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The best piece I have read from the IT Industry in the last two weeks or so is: Why desktop virtualization projects fail Desktop virtualization is one of the hottest topics of interest and a major initiative of many companies. Touted benefits include lower operating costs, simpler management and desktop mobility. Below we’ll explore what [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.techagility.info/2009/09/some-recent-comments-around-client-virtualization-view-xendesktop-remote-protocolsetc-now-that-vmworld-2009-has-been-and-gone/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>10</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Server 2008 R2 &#8211; Trying to deliver &quot;Pooled Virtual Desktops&quot;??? Is there something I&#8217;ve missed? ;-)</title>
		<link>http://www.techagility.info/2009/09/server-2008-r2-trying-to-deliver-pooled-virtual-desktops-is-there-something-ive-missed/</link>
		<comments>http://www.techagility.info/2009/09/server-2008-r2-trying-to-deliver-pooled-virtual-desktops-is-there-something-ive-missed/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Sep 2009 08:57:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>dcaddick</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Remote Protocols]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Thin Clients]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VDI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Virtualization]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techagility.info/2009/09/server-2008-r2-trying-to-deliver-pooled-virtual-desktops-is-there-something-ive-missed/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hi All, I have created a number of HyperV Servers that all have at least 1 instance of a Windows 7 VM running – and yet it seems that the Admin Tool from MS is *very* restricted in that there is no way to *pick* the VM’s up? They have to be auto-recognised somehow? With [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.techagility.info/2009/09/server-2008-r2-trying-to-deliver-pooled-virtual-desktops-is-there-something-ive-missed/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Citrix &#8220;announces&#8221; HDX-3D on ahead of VMworld, but no sign of a download or trial yet?</title>
		<link>http://www.techagility.info/2009/09/citrix-announces-hdx-3d-on-ahead-of-vmworld-but-no-sign-of-a-download-or-trial-yet/</link>
		<comments>http://www.techagility.info/2009/09/citrix-announces-hdx-3d-on-ahead-of-vmworld-but-no-sign-of-a-download-or-trial-yet/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Aug 2009 13:08:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>dcaddick</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Citrix]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Networks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Performance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Remote Protocols]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Thin Clients]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VDI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VMware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows 7]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[XPe]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techagility.info/2009/09/citrix-announces-hdx-3d-on-ahead-of-vmworld-but-no-sign-of-a-download-or-trial-yet/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So it’s hardly a surprise that Citrix have decided to “Announce” the long awaited HDX-3D “high quality user experience” protocol enhancement in the early hours prior to the start of the VMworld conference? Pardon me for being something of a sceptic, but it seems that this might have more to do with the fact that [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.techagility.info/2009/09/citrix-announces-hdx-3d-on-ahead-of-vmworld-but-no-sign-of-a-download-or-trial-yet/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>HP&#8217;s range of Linux Thin Clients getting a refresh?</title>
		<link>http://www.techagility.info/2009/08/hps-range-of-linux-thin-clients-getting-a-refresh/</link>
		<comments>http://www.techagility.info/2009/08/hps-range-of-linux-thin-clients-getting-a-refresh/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Aug 2009 11:52:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>dcaddick</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Citrix]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HP/Neoware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hardware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Linux]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Thin Clients]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VDI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[XenApp]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techagility.info/2009/08/hps-range-of-linux-thin-clients-getting-a-refresh/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So some of you may be aware that the new T5545 was released some while back with a new O/S designated ThinPro – this has recently been updated with a new release of Build 31 and now looks a little like this in Admin mode: To switch to Admin mode there is a simple menu [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.techagility.info/2009/08/hps-range-of-linux-thin-clients-getting-a-refresh/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How to install Remote Desktop Services in Win 2008 R2 with Screenshots</title>
		<link>http://www.techagility.info/2009/07/how-to-install-remote-desktop-services-in-win-2008-r2-with-screenshots/</link>
		<comments>http://www.techagility.info/2009/07/how-to-install-remote-desktop-services-in-win-2008-r2-with-screenshots/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2009 12:29:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>dcaddick</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blades]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hacking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Remote Protocols]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VDI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Virtualization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows 7]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techagility.info/2009/07/how-to-install-remote-desktop-services-in-win-2008-r2-with-screenshots/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So I noticed some good info coming out of the MSDN Terminal Server blog, like:Introducing Remote Desktop Connection Manager&#160;and I was reasonably curious if the RDS Brokering would allow you to attach or add Physical devices like BladePC’s or BladeWS’s to the Virtual Pooling of resources available for users to RDP in to. So I [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.techagility.info/2009/07/how-to-install-remote-desktop-services-in-win-2008-r2-with-screenshots/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Planning a Desktop Virtualization project? &#8211; it might be worth making sure you investigate if the Business needs a Remote Protocol that can deliver a &#8220;High Quality User Experience&#8221;? Is RDP7 up to it?</title>
		<link>http://www.techagility.info/2009/06/planning-a-desktop-virtualization-project-it-might-be-worth-making-sure-you-investigate-if-the-business-needs-a-remote-protocol-that-can-deliver-a-high-quality-user-experience/</link>
		<comments>http://www.techagility.info/2009/06/planning-a-desktop-virtualization-project-it-might-be-worth-making-sure-you-investigate-if-the-business-needs-a-remote-protocol-that-can-deliver-a-high-quality-user-experience/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Jun 2009 11:08:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>dcaddick</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Citrix]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HP/Neoware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Networks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Performance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Remote Protocols]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Thin Clients]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VDI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Virtualization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows 7]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techagility.info/?p=370</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[***UPDATE*** Please check the comments below – but it appears I’m incorrect on the statement regarding Teradici PCoIP needing a PCI card, there is a SW/SW version in development and I’d be guessing this might be coming out sometime around VMworld as Beta? Just a guess on my part? So just as we headed in [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.techagility.info/2009/06/planning-a-desktop-virtualization-project-it-might-be-worth-making-sure-you-investigate-if-the-business-needs-a-remote-protocol-that-can-deliver-a-high-quality-user-experience/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Getting Citrix XenDesktop Receiver working on Windows XPe Thin Clients</title>
		<link>http://www.techagility.info/2009/06/getting-citrix-xendesktop-receiver-working-on-windows-xpe-thin-clients/</link>
		<comments>http://www.techagility.info/2009/06/getting-citrix-xendesktop-receiver-working-on-windows-xpe-thin-clients/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Jun 2009 04:19:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>dcaddick</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Citrix]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HP/Neoware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hardware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Thin Clients]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VDI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[XPe]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techagility.info/2009/06/getting-citrix-xendesktop-receiver-working-on-windows-xpe-thin-clients/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If installing Citrix XenDesktop Receiver on any HP Thin Client with Windows XPe *prior* to the most recent release (Build 710) you may get an error, even after removing the original Citrix Client, that it is unable to install because of a previous Citrix Client install still exists&#8230;  I didn’t really waste any time on [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.techagility.info/2009/06/getting-citrix-xendesktop-receiver-working-on-windows-xpe-thin-clients/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>TCO/ROI calculations for Thin Clients</title>
		<link>http://www.techagility.info/2009/05/tcoroi-calculations-for-thin-clients/</link>
		<comments>http://www.techagility.info/2009/05/tcoroi-calculations-for-thin-clients/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 May 2009 05:09:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>dcaddick</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Hardware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Thin Clients]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VDI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Virtualization]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techagility.info/2009/05/tcoroi-calculations-for-thin-clients/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I was asked an interesting question at Tech@Work last week here in Sydney – I was asked by someone from Local Govt. where they could find TCO or ROI Calculators for justifying the purchase of Thin Clients. This chap also wanted know where the break-even cost was for implementing Thin Clients? So after chatting to [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.techagility.info/2009/05/tcoroi-calculations-for-thin-clients/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>17</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Can VDI be delivered via a cheap OS Virtualization mechanism that might beat the mature Hypervisors on both price AND graphics performance?</title>
		<link>http://www.techagility.info/2008/12/can-vdi-be-delivered-via-a-cheap-os-virtualization-mechanism-that-might-beat-the-mature-hypervisors-on-both-price-and-graphics-performance/</link>
		<comments>http://www.techagility.info/2008/12/can-vdi-be-delivered-via-a-cheap-os-virtualization-mechanism-that-might-beat-the-mature-hypervisors-on-both-price-and-graphics-performance/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 2008 02:57:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>dcaddick</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blades]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Citrix]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hardware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Performance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Remote Protocols]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Thin Clients]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VDI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VMware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Virtualization]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techagility.info/2008/12/can-vdi-be-delivered-via-a-cheap-os-virtualization-mechanism-that-might-beat-the-mature-hypervisors-on-both-price-and-graphics-performance/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Well thanks to an article by Alessandro at virtualization.info I have become aware of a company called iCore Software that appear to be heading down the virtualization path similar to Parallels in that it is OS based Virtualization. iCore brings OS virtualization to the clients, selling its containers, called Virtual Accounts, as different user personalities [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.techagility.info/2008/12/can-vdi-be-delivered-via-a-cheap-os-virtualization-mechanism-that-might-beat-the-mature-hypervisors-on-both-price-and-graphics-performance/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Download Server 2008 and get your first look at Viridian?</title>
		<link>http://www.techagility.info/2007/09/download-server-2008-and-get-your-first-look-at-viridian/</link>
		<comments>http://www.techagility.info/2007/09/download-server-2008-and-get-your-first-look-at-viridian/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Sep 2007 09:14:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>dcaddick</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blades]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Blogging]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Networks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Remote Protocols]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VDI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VMware]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techagility.info/2007/09/25/download-server-2008-and-get-your-first-look-at-viridian/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[After a wet and wild weekend camping Dugie pulls out all the stops again&#8230; Thanks Dugie, I wasn&#8217;t aware I needed to install the 64bit version to make it work? URLs for Windows 2008 RC0 and WSv WSS, Virtualization September 25th, 2007 If you want to download Windows 2008 RC0 with the Windows Server virtualization [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.techagility.info/2007/09/download-server-2008-and-get-your-first-look-at-viridian/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Daylight Saving Time Again?</title>
		<link>http://www.techagility.info/2007/09/daylight-saving-time-again/</link>
		<comments>http://www.techagility.info/2007/09/daylight-saving-time-again/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Sep 2007 08:39:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>dcaddick</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blogging]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Citrix]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Remote Protocols]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VDI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VMware]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techagility.info/2007/09/25/daylight-saving-time-again/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[From the Windows XP Embedded Team, It seems like we just went through Daylight Saving Time (see this blog post), but that time of year is coming up again.&#xA0; To help customers prepare for the upcoming changes Microsoft is hosting a Technical Review webcast today at 2:00PM Pacific time: Technical Review for Daylight Saving Time [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.techagility.info/2007/09/daylight-saving-time-again/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Deciding which Thin Client is the best for your organization? Is there a new paradigm starting to play out?</title>
		<link>http://www.techagility.info/2007/07/deciding-which-thin-client-is-the-best-for-your-organization-is-there-a-new-paradigm-starting-to-play-out/</link>
		<comments>http://www.techagility.info/2007/07/deciding-which-thin-client-is-the-best-for-your-organization-is-there-a-new-paradigm-starting-to-play-out/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Jul 2007 10:35:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>dcaddick</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Citrix]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HP/Neoware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hardware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Linux]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Remote Protocols]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Thin Clients]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VDI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[XPe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[XenApp]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techagility.info/2007/07/deciding-which-thin-client-is-the-best-for-your-organization-is-there-a-new-paradigm-starting-to-play-out/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Deciding which Thin Client is good for you? So you are considering a Desktop Refresh in your organization? Are you aware of the impending &#34;Tipping Point&#34; where the difference between PC&#8217;s and Thin Clients is about to become blurred? Traditional Thinking: Traditional thinking around Thin Clients focus&#8217;s on the matrix between a choice of Hardware [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.techagility.info/2007/07/deciding-which-thin-client-is-the-best-for-your-organization-is-there-a-new-paradigm-starting-to-play-out/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
