<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>TechAgility &#187; VMware</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.techagility.info/category/vmware/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.techagility.info</link>
	<description>using Technology to become more Agile at work and play - and more thoughts on VDI, Thin Clients, VMware, Citrix, etc...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 28 Jul 2010 06:46:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Errors when trying to add vCenter to vWorkspace 7.x after the original install</title>
		<link>http://www.techagility.info/2010/06/errors-when-trying-to-add-vcenter-to-vworkspace-7-x-after-the-original-install/</link>
		<comments>http://www.techagility.info/2010/06/errors-when-trying-to-add-vcenter-to-vworkspace-7-x-after-the-original-install/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jun 2010 12:18:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>dcaddick</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[VDI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VMware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Virtualization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vWorkspace]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techagility.info/2010/06/errors-when-trying-to-add-vcenter-to-vworkspace-7-x-after-the-original-install/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The communications to and from the VMware vCenter are encrypted via port 443 and as such use certificates to ensure their security. There is the ability to add the keystore from a VMware vCenter during the initial install of vWorkspace 7.x – however it is not possible (at the moment ) to go back and [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.techagility.info/2010/06/errors-when-trying-to-add-vcenter-to-vworkspace-7-x-after-the-original-install/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Justifying VDI &#8211; Part One &#171; EMC IT&#8217;s Journey to the Private Cloud</title>
		<link>http://www.techagility.info/2010/04/justifying-vdi-part-one-emc-its-journey-to-the-private-cloud/</link>
		<comments>http://www.techagility.info/2010/04/justifying-vdi-part-one-emc-its-journey-to-the-private-cloud/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Apr 2010 13:21:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>dcaddick</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Remote Protocols]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Thin Clients]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VDI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VMware]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techagility.info/2010/04/justifying-vdi-part-one-emc-its-journey-to-the-private-cloud/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I came across this very interesting post today as something that both validates the “Client Virtualization” approach (I think VDI is a bit too narrow as a definition?) and yet at the same time tells a cautionary tale about how it’s not as easy as it’s sometimes made out to be? and it is way [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.techagility.info/2010/04/justifying-vdi-part-one-emc-its-journey-to-the-private-cloud/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Great tip how-to boot from USB stick inside of VMware Workstation</title>
		<link>http://www.techagility.info/2010/04/great-tip-how-to-boot-from-usb-stick-inside-of-vmware-workstation/</link>
		<comments>http://www.techagility.info/2010/04/great-tip-how-to-boot-from-usb-stick-inside-of-vmware-workstation/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Apr 2010 05:48:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>dcaddick</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Hacking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Linux]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Troubleshooting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VMware]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techagility.info/2010/04/great-tip-how-to-boot-from-usb-stick-inside-of-vmware-workstation/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Some while back I was really wishing it was possible to boot to a USB Stick from within a VM – and now it is possible – great news because it just adds that little bit extra in the way of functionality Great tip how-to boot from USB stick inside of VMware Workstation A tip [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.techagility.info/2010/04/great-tip-how-to-boot-from-usb-stick-inside-of-vmware-workstation/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Installing WES 2011 CTP2 on a VM &#8211; it&#8217;s likely that 2Gb Flash will be sufficient? If you want Windows 7, and only 1.5Gb &#8211; will this be *THE* VDI base OS of choice?</title>
		<link>http://www.techagility.info/2010/01/installing-wes-2011-ctp2-on-a-vm-its-likely-that-2gb-flash-will-be-sufficient-but-will-mss-licensing-allow-upgrades/</link>
		<comments>http://www.techagility.info/2010/01/installing-wes-2011-ctp2-on-a-vm-its-likely-that-2gb-flash-will-be-sufficient-but-will-mss-licensing-allow-upgrades/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jan 2010 05:48:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>dcaddick</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Fun and Cool Stuff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hardware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Remote Protocols]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Thin Clients]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VDI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VMware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Virtualization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows 7]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[XPe]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techagility.info/2010/01/installing-wes-2011-ctp2-on-a-vm-its-likely-that-2gb-flash-will-be-sufficient-but-will-mss-licensing-allow-upgrades/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Just a brief update as to some of the changes that I have discovered in WES 2011 CTP2 (as opposed to the original CTP) – this was simply built on a default VM Template based on Windows 7. Also some useful reference links: Windows Embedded Standard 2011 CTP2 New Features and Changes Discovering Windows Embedded [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.techagility.info/2010/01/installing-wes-2011-ctp2-on-a-vm-its-likely-that-2gb-flash-will-be-sufficient-but-will-mss-licensing-allow-upgrades/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Musings on VDI performance</title>
		<link>http://www.techagility.info/2009/12/musings-on-vdi-performance/</link>
		<comments>http://www.techagility.info/2009/12/musings-on-vdi-performance/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Dec 2009 05:58:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>dcaddick</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[App Streaming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Citrix]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Finance and Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Networks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Performance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Remote Protocols]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Thin Clients]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VDI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VMware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Virtualization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows 7]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techagility.info/?p=447</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So as things slowdown in the lead up to the break I have had some time to get back and review some twitter posts and other blog articles that I have been meaning to catch up on. I must admit that I tend not to use Twitter that much but do find it quite useful [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.techagility.info/2009/12/musings-on-vdi-performance/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Some recent comments around Client Virtualization, View, XenDesktop, Remote Protocols,etc&#8230; now that VMworld 2009 has been and gone</title>
		<link>http://www.techagility.info/2009/09/some-recent-comments-around-client-virtualization-view-xendesktop-remote-protocolsetc-now-that-vmworld-2009-has-been-and-gone/</link>
		<comments>http://www.techagility.info/2009/09/some-recent-comments-around-client-virtualization-view-xendesktop-remote-protocolsetc-now-that-vmworld-2009-has-been-and-gone/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Sep 2009 01:54:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>dcaddick</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blades]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Citrix]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hardware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Remote Protocols]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Thin Clients]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VDI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VMware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Virtualization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[XenApp]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[XenServer]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techagility.info/2009/09/some-recent-comments-around-client-virtualization-view-xendesktop-remote-protocolsetc-now-that-vmworld-2009-has-been-and-gone/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The best piece I have read from the IT Industry in the last two weeks or so is: Why desktop virtualization projects fail Desktop virtualization is one of the hottest topics of interest and a major initiative of many companies. Touted benefits include lower operating costs, simpler management and desktop mobility. Below we’ll explore what [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.techagility.info/2009/09/some-recent-comments-around-client-virtualization-view-xendesktop-remote-protocolsetc-now-that-vmworld-2009-has-been-and-gone/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>10</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Citrix &#8220;announces&#8221; HDX-3D on ahead of VMworld, but no sign of a download or trial yet?</title>
		<link>http://www.techagility.info/2009/09/citrix-announces-hdx-3d-on-ahead-of-vmworld-but-no-sign-of-a-download-or-trial-yet/</link>
		<comments>http://www.techagility.info/2009/09/citrix-announces-hdx-3d-on-ahead-of-vmworld-but-no-sign-of-a-download-or-trial-yet/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Aug 2009 13:08:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>dcaddick</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Citrix]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Networks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Performance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Remote Protocols]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Thin Clients]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VDI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VMware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows 7]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[XPe]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techagility.info/2009/09/citrix-announces-hdx-3d-on-ahead-of-vmworld-but-no-sign-of-a-download-or-trial-yet/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So it’s hardly a surprise that Citrix have decided to “Announce” the long awaited HDX-3D “high quality user experience” protocol enhancement in the early hours prior to the start of the VMworld conference? Pardon me for being something of a sceptic, but it seems that this might have more to do with the fact that [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.techagility.info/2009/09/citrix-announces-hdx-3d-on-ahead-of-vmworld-but-no-sign-of-a-download-or-trial-yet/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Windows 7 beta now available for download?</title>
		<link>http://www.techagility.info/2008/12/windows-7-beta-now-available-for-download/</link>
		<comments>http://www.techagility.info/2008/12/windows-7-beta-now-available-for-download/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 2008 03:36:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>dcaddick</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Performance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VMware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Virtualization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows 7]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techagility.info/2008/12/windows-7-beta-now-available-for-download/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So I am taking a keen interest in Windows 7 as it comes out and I noticed this post today regarding the leak of the latest build and it very much looks like it’s as close as you can get to a Beta for now? The Windows 7 build 7000 leak and Microsoft&#8217;s reaction By [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.techagility.info/2008/12/windows-7-beta-now-available-for-download/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Can VDI be delivered via a cheap OS Virtualization mechanism that might beat the mature Hypervisors on both price AND graphics performance?</title>
		<link>http://www.techagility.info/2008/12/can-vdi-be-delivered-via-a-cheap-os-virtualization-mechanism-that-might-beat-the-mature-hypervisors-on-both-price-and-graphics-performance/</link>
		<comments>http://www.techagility.info/2008/12/can-vdi-be-delivered-via-a-cheap-os-virtualization-mechanism-that-might-beat-the-mature-hypervisors-on-both-price-and-graphics-performance/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 2008 02:57:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>dcaddick</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blades]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Citrix]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hardware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Performance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Remote Protocols]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Thin Clients]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VDI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VMware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Virtualization]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techagility.info/2008/12/can-vdi-be-delivered-via-a-cheap-os-virtualization-mechanism-that-might-beat-the-mature-hypervisors-on-both-price-and-graphics-performance/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Well thanks to an article by Alessandro at virtualization.info I have become aware of a company called iCore Software that appear to be heading down the virtualization path similar to Parallels in that it is OS based Virtualization. iCore brings OS virtualization to the clients, selling its containers, called Virtual Accounts, as different user personalities [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.techagility.info/2008/12/can-vdi-be-delivered-via-a-cheap-os-virtualization-mechanism-that-might-beat-the-mature-hypervisors-on-both-price-and-graphics-performance/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Released: Microsoft Hyper-V 1.0 now RTM and available for download</title>
		<link>http://www.techagility.info/2008/06/released-microsoft-hyper-v-10-now-rtm-and-available-for-download/</link>
		<comments>http://www.techagility.info/2008/06/released-microsoft-hyper-v-10-now-rtm-and-available-for-download/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jun 2008 21:04:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>dcaddick</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blogging]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VMware]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techagility.info/2008/06/27/released-microsoft-hyper-v-10-now-rtm-and-available-for-download/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So this mornings news from Alessandro is the release of Hyper-V &#8211; Download a trial here. I have also included at the bottom of this post a number of links that Justin Zarb helped collate regarding where to find all kinds of info relating to Hyper-V Release: Microsoft Hyper-V 1.0 Thursday, June 26, 2008&#160;&#160; &#124;&#160;&#160; [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.techagility.info/2008/06/released-microsoft-hyper-v-10-now-rtm-and-available-for-download/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Login Consultants benchmarking tool to compare VDI vs. SBC?</title>
		<link>http://www.techagility.info/2008/05/login-consultants-benchmarking-tool-to-compare-vdi-vs-sbc/</link>
		<comments>http://www.techagility.info/2008/05/login-consultants-benchmarking-tool-to-compare-vdi-vs-sbc/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 May 2008 12:30:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>dcaddick</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blogging]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Performance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Thin Clients]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VMware]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techagility.info/2008/05/12/login-consultants-benchmarking-tool-to-compare-vdi-vs-sbc/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[My only disappointment is that we are currently in the middle of moving our current Solutions Centre from one Office location to the other so it&#8217;ll be some while before I get a chance to test this. It certainly looks quite impressive and it does have some lofty aims, but from a brief look through [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.techagility.info/2008/05/login-consultants-benchmarking-tool-to-compare-vdi-vs-sbc/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Thinstall to be reborn as ThinApp under VMware&#8217;s new management?</title>
		<link>http://www.techagility.info/2008/05/thinstall-to-be-reborn-as-thinapp-under-vmwares-new-management/</link>
		<comments>http://www.techagility.info/2008/05/thinstall-to-be-reborn-as-thinapp-under-vmwares-new-management/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 May 2008 07:44:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>dcaddick</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[App Streaming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Blogging]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Thin Clients]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VMware]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techagility.info/2008/05/12/thinstall-to-be-reborn-as-thinapp-under-vmwares-new-management/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So along with Alessandro I&#8217;m curious as to why the name ThinApp has been chosen as it does have more than a passing resemblance to Citrix&#8217;s new XenApp? I wonder if this is any indication of the coming marketing campaigns in the push for customers attention in the Desktop Virtualization market? VMware ThinApp is the [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.techagility.info/2008/05/thinstall-to-be-reborn-as-thinapp-under-vmwares-new-management/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Login Consultants announce Beta release scheduled for May 7th of Login Virtual Session Indexer (Login VSI)</title>
		<link>http://www.techagility.info/2008/04/login-consultants-announce-beta-release-scheduled-for-may-7th-of-login-virtual-session-indexer-login-vsi/</link>
		<comments>http://www.techagility.info/2008/04/login-consultants-announce-beta-release-scheduled-for-may-7th-of-login-virtual-session-indexer-login-vsi/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Apr 2008 20:48:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>dcaddick</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blogging]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Performance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Troubleshooting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VMware]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techagility.info/2008/04/17/login-consultants-announce-beta-release-scheduled-for-may-7th-of-login-virtual-session-indexer-login-vsi/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So this turned up in my email this morning courtesy of Login Consultants and I must admit that I am intrigued as to what it&#8217;s full capabilities will be, but judging by their previous efforts with tools like Flex Profiles I&#8217;m sure it will be a very useful tool indeed. May 7: 1st Beta Release [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.techagility.info/2008/04/login-consultants-announce-beta-release-scheduled-for-may-7th-of-login-virtual-session-indexer-login-vsi/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Windows is &#8216;collapsing,&#8217; Gartner analysts warn</title>
		<link>http://www.techagility.info/2008/04/windows-is-collapsing-gartner-analysts-warn/</link>
		<comments>http://www.techagility.info/2008/04/windows-is-collapsing-gartner-analysts-warn/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Apr 2008 05:19:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>dcaddick</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blogging]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Performance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VMware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vista]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techagility.info/2008/04/13/windows-is-collapsing-gartner-analysts-warn/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Well tell us something we don&#8217;t know? Seriously, I have recently started using a new HP 2710p laptop and I&#8217;m shocked to find that my normal RAM load is something around 1 &#8211; 1.1Gb just doing routine tasks&#8230;&#160; how crazy is that? When I get time I do want to rebuild it with the XP [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.techagility.info/2008/04/windows-is-collapsing-gartner-analysts-warn/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>VMware Workstation 6.5 beta1 doesn&#8217;t allow ESX as guest anymore??</title>
		<link>http://www.techagility.info/2008/04/vmware-workstation-65-beta1-doesnt-allow-esx-as-guest-anymore/</link>
		<comments>http://www.techagility.info/2008/04/vmware-workstation-65-beta1-doesnt-allow-esx-as-guest-anymore/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Apr 2008 04:07:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>dcaddick</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blogging]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VMware]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techagility.info/2008/04/13/vmware-workstation-65-beta1-doesnt-allow-esx-as-guest-anymore/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So news is in courtesy of Alessandro that it looks like it&#8217;s quite possible that folks will no longer be able to run ESX as a guest OS inside VMware Workstation. We all know it&#8217;s not a good idea &#8211; but sometimes it&#8217;s the easiest way of being able to demonstrate or troubleshoot issues when [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.techagility.info/2008/04/vmware-workstation-65-beta1-doesnt-allow-esx-as-guest-anymore/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Dell to give VMware ESX Server 3i for free?</title>
		<link>http://www.techagility.info/2008/03/dell-to-give-vmware-esx-server-3i-for-free/</link>
		<comments>http://www.techagility.info/2008/03/dell-to-give-vmware-esx-server-3i-for-free/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Mar 2008 03:30:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>dcaddick</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blogging]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Linux]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VMware]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techagility.info/2008/03/17/dell-to-give-vmware-esx-server-3i-for-free/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Talk about the cat among the pigeons? I was certainly aware that MS&#8217;s 2008 was to have Hyper-V included at a minimal cost of USD$28 but that is not due for another 5 months or so, and it was always expected that the pricepoint would come down to meet MS but this is quite early [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.techagility.info/2008/03/dell-to-give-vmware-esx-server-3i-for-free/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Thinstall quick out of the blocks?</title>
		<link>http://www.techagility.info/2008/03/thinstall-quick-out-of-the-blocks/</link>
		<comments>http://www.techagility.info/2008/03/thinstall-quick-out-of-the-blocks/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Mar 2008 04:03:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>dcaddick</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[App Streaming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Blogging]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Thin Clients]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VMware]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techagility.info/2008/03/08/thinstall-quick-out-of-the-blocks/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It&#8217;s good to see quality products don&#8217;t always have to languish in no-man&#8217;s land following an acquisition? Hopefully they haven&#8217;t lost too much steam and can maintain their enthusiasm? It now just remains to see how VMware integrates this component in to the bigger picture? VMware Project North Star Beta (Thinstall) (for Windows Systems) Latest [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.techagility.info/2008/03/thinstall-quick-out-of-the-blocks/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Live Demos of VDM2 from VMware and XenDesktop from Citrix</title>
		<link>http://www.techagility.info/2008/02/live-demos-of-vdm2-from-vmware-and-xendesktop-from-citrix/</link>
		<comments>http://www.techagility.info/2008/02/live-demos-of-vdm2-from-vmware-and-xendesktop-from-citrix/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Feb 2008 03:41:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>dcaddick</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blogging]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Thin Clients]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VMware]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techagility.info/2008/02/09/live-demos-of-vdm2-from-vmware-and-xendesktop-from-citrix/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In some cases the regular methods of &#34;Going to Market&#34; with a new product is fraught with pitfalls as it is conceived by Marketing and/or Product managers who then seem to loose sight of what the Customer is actually after &#8211; I&#8217;ve always thought it better to get the product and solution in front of [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.techagility.info/2008/02/live-demos-of-vdm2-from-vmware-and-xendesktop-from-citrix/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>So VMware goes for an acquisition of Thinstall, not FastScale!!</title>
		<link>http://www.techagility.info/2008/01/so-vmware-goes-for-an-acquisition-of-thinstall-not-fastscale/</link>
		<comments>http://www.techagility.info/2008/01/so-vmware-goes-for-an-acquisition-of-thinstall-not-fastscale/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jan 2008 21:06:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>dcaddick</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[App Streaming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Blogging]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VMware]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techagility.info/2008/01/16/so-vmware-goes-for-an-acquisition-of-thinstall-not-fastscale/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So this certainly adds some ammunition for VMware&#8217;s coming stoush with Microsoft in the Battle of the Hypervisors? It makes you wonder who&#8217;s next on VMware&#8217;s radar? VMware acquires Thinstall Just yesterday virtualization.info published the news about a possible acqusition of VMware in the application virtualization market, speculating that the acquired firm could be FastScale. [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.techagility.info/2008/01/so-vmware-goes-for-an-acquisition-of-thinstall-not-fastscale/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Production Servers now at 95% Virtualization</title>
		<link>http://www.techagility.info/2007/12/production-servers-now-at-95-virtualization/</link>
		<comments>http://www.techagility.info/2007/12/production-servers-now-at-95-virtualization/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Dec 2007 00:16:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>dcaddick</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blogging]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Performance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VMware]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techagility.info/2007/12/17/production-servers-now-at-95-virtualization/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I found this article today at CIO via an Article at Doug Browns site www.dabcc.com and thought it too good to just post the quote. This is exactly why Virtualization is shaking up the IT market so much &#8211; it has the capacity to drastically change the way you think about &#34;Flexibility&#34; and &#34;Agility&#34;. Being [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.techagility.info/2007/12/production-servers-now-at-95-virtualization/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
