<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>TechAgility &#187; XenServer</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.techagility.info/category/xenserver/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.techagility.info</link>
	<description>using Technology to become more Agile at work and play - and more thoughts on VDI, Thin Clients, VMware, Citrix, etc...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 28 Jul 2010 06:46:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Some recent comments around Client Virtualization, View, XenDesktop, Remote Protocols,etc&#8230; now that VMworld 2009 has been and gone</title>
		<link>http://www.techagility.info/2009/09/some-recent-comments-around-client-virtualization-view-xendesktop-remote-protocolsetc-now-that-vmworld-2009-has-been-and-gone/</link>
		<comments>http://www.techagility.info/2009/09/some-recent-comments-around-client-virtualization-view-xendesktop-remote-protocolsetc-now-that-vmworld-2009-has-been-and-gone/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Sep 2009 01:54:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>dcaddick</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blades]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Citrix]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hardware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Remote Protocols]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Thin Clients]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VDI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VMware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Virtualization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[XenApp]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[XenServer]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techagility.info/2009/09/some-recent-comments-around-client-virtualization-view-xendesktop-remote-protocolsetc-now-that-vmworld-2009-has-been-and-gone/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The best piece I have read from the IT Industry in the last two weeks or so is: Why desktop virtualization projects fail Desktop virtualization is one of the hottest topics of interest and a major initiative of many companies. Touted benefits include lower operating costs, simpler management and desktop mobility. Below we’ll explore what [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.techagility.info/2009/09/some-recent-comments-around-client-virtualization-view-xendesktop-remote-protocolsetc-now-that-vmworld-2009-has-been-and-gone/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>10</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>New Whitepapers from HP about how to Automate Citrix XenApp on XenServer with Powershell scripts, etc.</title>
		<link>http://www.techagility.info/2009/06/new-whitepapers-from-hp-about-how-to-automate-citrix-xenapp-on-xenserver-with-powershell-scripts-etc/</link>
		<comments>http://www.techagility.info/2009/06/new-whitepapers-from-hp-about-how-to-automate-citrix-xenapp-on-xenserver-with-powershell-scripts-etc/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Jun 2009 22:46:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>dcaddick</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blades]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Citrix]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HP/Neoware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Performance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Virtualization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[XenApp]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[XenServer]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techagility.info/2009/06/new-whitepapers-from-hp-about-how-to-automate-citrix-xenapp-on-xenserver-with-powershell-scripts-etc/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[**UPDATE** I have received the following comment: has anyone had any luck with the Automating Citrix Xenapp whitepaper, as i have issues when trying to import the deploy XenServer Altiris job as both .bin files seem to contain the same jobs, which are for deploying clients. And yes this is the case – I have [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.techagility.info/2009/06/new-whitepapers-from-hp-about-how-to-automate-citrix-xenapp-on-xenserver-with-powershell-scripts-etc/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Updated performance testing for BL685c G6 in x64 Terminal Server/XenApp shows minimal overhead for Virtualization</title>
		<link>http://www.techagility.info/2009/06/updated-performance-testing-for-bl685c-g6-in-x64-terminal-serverxenapp-shows-minimal-overhead-for-virtualization/</link>
		<comments>http://www.techagility.info/2009/06/updated-performance-testing-for-bl685c-g6-in-x64-terminal-serverxenapp-shows-minimal-overhead-for-virtualization/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Jun 2009 21:58:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>dcaddick</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Citrix]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Performance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Virtualization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[XenApp]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[XenServer]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techagility.info/2009/06/updated-performance-testing-for-bl685c-g6-in-x64-terminal-serverxenapp-shows-minimal-overhead-for-virtualization/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I just wanted folks to know that there’s some new testing results out that would appear to indicate that with XenApp being virtualized on XenServer there is minimal overhead so long as you are not pushing the XenApp servers above 80% CPU &#60;snip&#62; A 4P/24C3 HP ProLiant BL685c G6 server blade equipped with the Six-Core [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.techagility.info/2009/06/updated-performance-testing-for-bl685c-g6-in-x64-terminal-serverxenapp-shows-minimal-overhead-for-virtualization/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>13</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
